Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2021 Jul;81(4):332-338. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2021.1908590. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
Transition to new analytical systems and methods requires end-user verification to ensure acceptability for routine use. Our aim was to verify precision of MAGLUMI 800 immunoassay analyzer for 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP), 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D), aldosterone, androstenedione, growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) and renin, as well as to assess their comparability with the routinely used assays. Precision was evaluated at two levels following the CLSI EP15-A2 protocol. Method comparison included parallel analysis of 40 routine samples for each assay on MAGLUMI 800 and the routinely used automated or manual immunoassays. Within-run coefficients of variation (CV) ranged from 0.8% (androstenedione) to 14.5% (aldosterone), between-run CVs from 1.0% (IGFBP-3) to 12.8% (renin), while within-laboratory (total) precision CVs were from 2.1% (IGFBP-3) to 14.9% (renin). All assays with the exception of IGF-1 and 25(OH)D at the low concentration control level, satisfied biological variation criteria for imprecision. Passing-Bablok regression showed proportional difference for 17-OHP and aldosterone, constant for androstenedione, while both constant and proportional difference was revealed for 25(OH)D, GH and IGF-1. Statistically significant relative biases higher than the desirable biological variation acceptance criteria were observed for 17-OHP, 25(OH)D, aldosterone, androstenedione and IGF-1. The evaluated assays need further assessment as well as verification of reference intervals in order to be suitable for introduction into routine practice in our laboratory. Our study clearly demonstrates that we are still far from achieving immunoassay standardization and comparability of results.
过渡到新的分析系统和方法需要终端用户验证,以确保其可用于常规使用。我们的目的是验证 MAGLUMI 800 免疫分析仪用于 17-羟孕酮(17-OHP)、25-羟维生素 D(25(OH)D)、醛固酮、雄烯二酮、生长激素(GH)、胰岛素样生长因子 1(IGF-1)、胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白 3(IGFBP-3)和肾素的精密度,并评估其与常规使用的检测方法的可比性。精密度按照 CLSI EP15-A2 方案在两个水平进行评估。方法比较包括在 MAGLUMI 800 和常规使用的自动化或手动免疫分析中对每个检测的 40 个常规样本进行平行分析。批内变异系数(CV)范围为 0.8%(雄烯二酮)至 14.5%(醛固酮),批间 CV 范围为 1.0%(IGFBP-3)至 12.8%(肾素),而实验室内部(总)精密度 CV 范围为 2.1%(IGFBP-3)至 14.9%(肾素)。除 IGF-1 和低浓度对照水平的 25(OH)D 外,所有检测均满足不精密度的生物学变异标准。Passing-Bablok 回归显示 17-OHP 和醛固酮存在比例差异,雄烯二酮存在常数,而 25(OH)D、GH 和 IGF-1 则存在常数和比例差异。17-OHP、25(OH)D、醛固酮、雄烯二酮和 IGF-1 的相对偏差显著高于理想的生物学变异可接受标准。需要进一步评估评估的检测,并验证参考区间,以便适合在我们实验室的常规实践中使用。我们的研究清楚地表明,我们离实现免疫分析标准化和结果可比性还有很长的路要走。