Suppr超能文献

内稳态突触可塑性建立了联想记忆的特异性。

Homeostatic synaptic scaling establishes the specificity of an associative memory.

机构信息

Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.

Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.

出版信息

Curr Biol. 2021 Jun 7;31(11):2274-2285.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

Abstract

Correlation-based (Hebbian) forms of synaptic plasticity are crucial for the initial encoding of associative memories but likely insufficient to enable the stable storage of multiple specific memories within neural circuits. Theoretical studies have suggested that homeostatic synaptic normalization rules provide an essential countervailing force that can stabilize and expand memory storage capacity. Although such homeostatic mechanisms have been identified and studied for decades, experimental evidence that they play an important role in associative memory is lacking. Here, we show that synaptic scaling, a widely studied form of homeostatic synaptic plasticity that globally renormalizes synaptic strengths, is dispensable for initial associative memory formation but crucial for the establishment of memory specificity. We used conditioned taste aversion (CTA) learning, a form of associative learning that relies on Hebbian mechanisms within gustatory cortex (GC), to show that animals conditioned to avoid saccharin initially generalized this aversion to other novel tastants. Specificity of the aversion to saccharin emerged slowly over a time course of many hours and was associated with synaptic scaling down of excitatory synapses onto conditioning-active neuronal ensembles within gustatory cortex. Blocking synaptic scaling down in the gustatory cortex enhanced the persistence of synaptic strength increases induced by conditioning and prolonged the duration of memory generalization. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that synaptic scaling is crucial for sculpting the specificity of an associative memory and suggest that the relative strengths of Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity can modulate the balance between stable memory formation and memory generalization.

摘要

基于关联(海伯)的突触可塑性对于联想记忆的初始编码至关重要,但不足以使神经回路中稳定存储多个特定记忆。理论研究表明,自我平衡的突触归一化规则提供了一种必要的抗衡力量,可以稳定和扩展记忆存储容量。尽管已经识别和研究了这种自我平衡机制数十年,但缺乏它们在联想记忆中起重要作用的实验证据。在这里,我们表明,突触缩放是一种广泛研究的自我平衡突触可塑性形式,它可以全局重新归一化突触强度,对于初始联想记忆形成是可有可无的,但对于建立记忆特异性却是至关重要的。我们使用条件味觉厌恶(CTA)学习,这是一种依赖于味觉皮层(GC)中海伯机制的联想学习形式,表明对蔗糖产生厌恶条件反射的动物最初会将这种厌恶泛化到其他新的味觉上。对蔗糖的厌恶特异性是在数小时的时间过程中缓慢出现的,与味觉皮层中兴奋性突触对 Conditioning-active 神经元集合的突触缩放有关。阻断味觉皮层中的突触缩放会增强 Conditioning 诱导的突触强度增加的持久性,并延长记忆泛化的持续时间。总之,这些发现表明,突触缩放对于塑造联想记忆的特异性至关重要,并表明海伯和自我平衡可塑性的相对强度可以调节稳定记忆形成和记忆泛化之间的平衡。

相似文献

1
Homeostatic synaptic scaling establishes the specificity of an associative memory.
Curr Biol. 2021 Jun 7;31(11):2274-2285.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
3
Strong Aversive Conditioning Triggers a Long-Lasting Generalized Aversion.
Front Cell Neurosci. 2022 Feb 28;16:854315. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.854315. eCollection 2022.
4
Glucocorticoids enhance taste aversion memory via actions in the insular cortex and basolateral amygdala.
Learn Mem. 2008 Jul 7;15(7):468-76. doi: 10.1101/lm.964708. Print 2008 Jul.
5
Myosin II regulates actin rearrangement-related structural synaptic plasticity during conditioned taste aversion memory extinction.
Brain Struct Funct. 2015 Mar;220(2):813-25. doi: 10.1007/s00429-013-0685-5. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
6
Taste memory: the role of protein synthesis in gustatory cortex.
Behav Neural Biol. 1993 Jan;59(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/0163-1047(93)91145-d.
7
Control of Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity by AKAP-Anchored Kinase and Phosphatase Regulation of Ca-Permeable AMPA Receptors.
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 14;38(11):2863-2876. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2362-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
8
Homeostatic Plasticity Achieved by Incorporation of Random Fluctuations and Soft-Bounded Hebbian Plasticity in Excitatory Synapses.
Front Neural Circuits. 2016 Jun 1;10:42. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2016.00042. eCollection 2016.
10
Dynamic DNA methylation controls glutamate receptor trafficking and synaptic scaling.
J Neurochem. 2016 May;137(3):312-30. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13564. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning-Associated Flexibility of Cortical Taste Coding Is Impaired in Shank3 Knockout Mice.
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 21:2025.08.21.671527. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.21.671527.
2
Early-life adversities compromise behavioral development in male and female mice heterozygous for CNTNAP2.
Neurobiol Stress. 2025 Apr 22;36:100726. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2025.100726. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Homeostatic regulation of a motor circuit through temperature sensing rather than activity sensing.
Curr Biol. 2025 May 19;35(10):2256-2265.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.03.054. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
4
A neural mechanism for learning from delayed postingestive feedback.
Nature. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08828-z.
5
Prey capture learning drives critical period-specific plasticity in mouse binocular visual cortex.
bioRxiv. 2025 Jan 28:2025.01.28.635373. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.28.635373.
6
Homeostatic regulation of a motor circuit through temperature sensing rather than activity sensing.
bioRxiv. 2025 Jan 11:2025.01.10.632419. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.10.632419.
8
Offline ensemble co-reactivation links memories across days.
Nature. 2025 Jan;637(8044):145-155. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08168-4. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
10
Clinical parameters affect the structure and function of superficial pyramidal neurons in the adult human neocortex.
Brain Commun. 2024 Oct 7;6(5):fcae351. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae351. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

2
Sleep Promotes Downward Firing Rate Homeostasis.
Neuron. 2021 Feb 3;109(3):530-544.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
3
LTD at amygdalocortical synapses as a novel mechanism for hedonic learning.
Elife. 2020 Nov 10;9:e55175. doi: 10.7554/eLife.55175.
4
The Interplay of Synaptic Plasticity and Scaling Enables Self-Organized Formation and Allocation of Multiple Memory Representations.
Front Neural Circuits. 2020 Oct 7;14:541728. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2020.541728. eCollection 2020.
5
Functionally Distinct Neuronal Ensembles within the Memory Engram.
Cell. 2020 Apr 16;181(2):410-423.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.055. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
6
Memory engrams: Recalling the past and imagining the future.
Science. 2020 Jan 3;367(6473). doi: 10.1126/science.aaw4325.
7
Generalization of fear in post-traumatic stress disorder.
Psychophysiology. 2020 Jan;57(1):e13422. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13422. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
8
Synaptotagmin-3 drives AMPA receptor endocytosis, depression of synapse strength, and forgetting.
Science. 2019 Jan 4;363(6422). doi: 10.1126/science.aav1483. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
9
Neuronal competition: microcircuit mechanisms define the sparsity of the engram.
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019 Feb;54:163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Nov 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验