Sweatt J David
Department of Neurobiology, Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, Civitan International Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
J Neurochem. 2016 May;137(3):312-30. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13564. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
Hebbian plasticity, including long-term potentiation and long-term depression, has long been regarded as important for local circuit refinement in the context of memory formation and stabilization. However, circuit development and stabilization additionally relies on non-Hebbian, homeostatic, forms of plasticity such as synaptic scaling. Synaptic scaling is induced by chronic increases or decreases in neuronal activity. Synaptic scaling is associated with cell-wide adjustments in postsynaptic receptor density, and can occur in a multiplicative manner resulting in preservation of relative synaptic strengths across the entire neuron's population of synapses. Both active DNA methylation and demethylation have been validated as crucial regulators of gene transcription during learning, and synaptic scaling is known to be transcriptionally dependent. However, it has been unclear whether homeostatic forms of plasticity such as synaptic scaling are regulated via epigenetic mechanisms. This review describes exciting recent work that has demonstrated a role for active changes in neuronal DNA methylation and demethylation as a controller of synaptic scaling and glutamate receptor trafficking. These findings bring together three major categories of memory-associated mechanisms that were previously largely considered separately: DNA methylation, homeostatic plasticity, and glutamate receptor trafficking. This review describes exciting recent work that has demonstrated a role for active changes in neuronal DNA methylation and demethylation as a controller of synaptic scaling and glutamate receptor trafficking. These findings bring together three major categories of memory-associated mechanisms that were previously considered separately: glutamate receptor trafficking, DNA methylation, and homeostatic plasticity.
长期以来,赫布可塑性,包括长时程增强和长时程抑制,在记忆形成和稳定的背景下,一直被认为对局部神经回路的精细化很重要。然而,神经回路的发育和稳定还依赖于非赫布性的、稳态的可塑性形式,如突触缩放。突触缩放由神经元活动的慢性增加或减少所诱导。突触缩放与突触后受体密度的全细胞范围调节相关,并且可以以乘法方式发生,从而在整个神经元的突触群体中保持相对突触强度。在学习过程中,主动DNA甲基化和去甲基化均已被证实是基因转录的关键调节因子,并且已知突触缩放依赖于转录。然而,尚不清楚诸如突触缩放等稳态可塑性形式是否通过表观遗传机制进行调节。本综述描述了最近令人兴奋的研究工作,这些工作表明神经元DNA甲基化和去甲基化的主动变化作为突触缩放和谷氨酸受体转运的控制器发挥作用。这些发现将以前很大程度上被分开考虑的三类主要的记忆相关机制结合在一起:DNA甲基化、稳态可塑性和谷氨酸受体转运。本综述描述了最近令人兴奋的研究工作,这些工作表明神经元DNA甲基化和去甲基化的主动变化作为突触缩放和谷氨酸受体转运的控制器发挥作用。这些发现将以前被分别考虑的三类主要的记忆相关机制结合在一起:谷氨酸受体转运、DNA甲基化和稳态可塑性。