Suppr超能文献

经乳头胆囊支架置入术用于急性胆囊炎的长期治疗。

Transpapillary gallbladder stent placement for long-term therapy of acute cholecystitis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Division of Vascular Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Oct;94(4):742-748.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.025. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Select patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) are poor candidates for cholecystectomy. ERCP-guided transpapillary gallbladder (GB) drainage (ERGD) is one modality for nonoperative management of AC in these patients. Our primary aim was to evaluate long-term success of destination ERGD. Secondary aims were the rate of technical and clinical success, number of repeat procedures, rate of adverse events, and risk factors for recurrent AC.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with AC who were not candidates for cholecystectomy underwent ERGD with attempted transpapillary GB plastic double-pigtail stent placement at a tertiary hospital from January 2008 to December 2019. Long-term success was defined as no AC after ERGD until 6 months, death, or reintervention. Technical success was defined as placement of at least 1 transpapillary stent into the GB and clinical success as resolution of AC symptoms with discharge from the hospital.

RESULTS

Long-term success was achieved in 95.9% of patients (47/49), technical success in 96% (49/51), and clinical success 100% in those with technical success. Mild adverse events occurred in 5.9% (n = 3). Mean follow-up was 453 days after ERGD (range, 18-1879). A trend toward longer time to recurrence of AC was seen in patients with 2 rather than 1 GB stent placed (P = .13), and more repeat procedures were performed when a single stent was placed (P = .045).

CONCLUSIONS

ERGD with transpapillary GB double-pigtail stent placement is a safe and effective long-term therapy for poor surgical candidates with AC. Risk factors for recurrence include stent removal and single-stent therapy. Double-stent therapy is not always technically feasible but may salvage failed single-stent therapy or recurrence after elective stent removal and may therefore be the preferred treatment modality.

摘要

背景与目的

选择患有急性胆囊炎(AC)的患者是胆囊切除术的不良候选者。内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)引导下经乳头胆囊(GB)引流(ERGD)是这些患者非手术治疗 AC 的一种方式。我们的主要目的是评估目的地 ERGD 的长期成功率。次要目的是技术和临床成功率、重复程序的数量、不良事件的发生率以及 AC 复发的危险因素。

方法

2008 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月,在一家三级医院,对不适合行胆囊切除术的 AC 连续患者进行 ERGD,并尝试经乳头 GB 塑料双猪尾支架置入术。长期成功定义为 ERGD 后 6 个月内无 AC、死亡或再次干预。技术成功定义为至少将 1 根经乳头支架置入 GB,临床成功定义为 AC 症状缓解并出院。

结果

95.9%(47/49)的患者达到长期成功,96%(49/51)的患者达到技术成功,技术成功患者的临床成功率为 100%。5.9%(n=3)的患者发生轻度不良事件。ERGD 后平均随访时间为 453 天(范围,18-1879 天)。与放置 1 根 GB 支架的患者相比,放置 2 根 GB 支架的患者 AC 复发时间更长(P=0.13),放置单根支架的患者重复程序更多(P=0.045)。

结论

经乳头 GB 双猪尾支架置入术 ERGD 是一种安全有效的长期治疗方法,适用于 AC 手术不良候选者。复发的危险因素包括支架取出和单支架治疗。双支架治疗并不总是可行,但可能挽救失败的单支架治疗或择期支架取出后的复发,因此可能是首选的治疗方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验