Suppr超能文献

青少年家庭、同伴和外化行为维度评估:综合工具(FPEB)的提出。

Assessment of Family, Peers, and Externalising Behaviour Dimensions in Adolescence: The Proposal of a Comprehensive Instrument (FPEB).

机构信息

Department of Human Sciences, Lumsa University of Rome, Piazza delle Vaschette, 101, 00193 Roma, Italy.

Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Piazzale S. Agostino, 2, 24129 Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 8;18(5):2724. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052724.

Abstract

In the context of externalising behaviour problems, risk factor research (RFR) focuses on risk and protective factors of juvenile delinquency, which can pertain to individual, system, and societal levels. Several instruments aiming at measuring these factors have been developed, but a comprehensive research tool is missing. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a questionnaire, the "Family, Peers, and Externalising Behaviour in adolescence" (FPEB) as a tool for assessing adolescents' tendency of externalising behaviour, the quality of relation with their parents, and peer-relations. FPEB was administered to 835 Italian students (36.8% males, age = 13.81, = 1.54) together with the Moral Disengagement questionnaire to test concurrent validity. Data about socio-demographics and school performance were also collected. An EFA (Promax rotation, subsample A, = 444) resulted in a four-factor structure that was corroborated by a CFA (subsample B, = 388). The factors were "externalising behaviour" (var 13.16%), "peer relations difficulties" (var 11.10%), "Family conflict" (var 8.32%), and "lack of family negotiation" (var 7.11%) and showed good internal consistency (all α ≥ 0.65). There were differences between males and females in the correlational patterns of the four factors. The FPEB factors also showed good concurrent validity: two of the four factors ("lack of family negotiation" and "externalising behaviour") and the total score of the scale correlated with the "Moral disengagement scale", whereas peer relation difficulties did not. Further analyses also showed gender differences (except for "peer relations difficulties") and an association between students' school performance and "externalising behaviour", "family conflict", and the total FPEB scores. We concluded that the FPEB is a tool that is potentially useful to assess risk and protective factors and to plan targeted interventions (focusing on the specific area). Limitations and suggestions for further improvements are also discussed.

摘要

在外化行为问题的背景下,风险因素研究(RFR)侧重于青少年犯罪的风险和保护因素,这些因素可能涉及个人、系统和社会层面。已经开发出了几种旨在测量这些因素的工具,但缺乏一种全面的研究工具。本研究的目的是开发和验证一种问卷,即“家庭、同伴和青少年外化行为”(FPEB),作为评估青少年外化行为倾向、与父母关系质量和同伴关系的工具。FPEB 被用于 835 名意大利学生(36.8%为男性,年龄为 13.81 岁, = 1.54),同时还使用了道德脱离问卷来测试其同时效度。还收集了有关社会人口统计学和学校表现的数据。EFA(Promax 旋转,子样本 A,n=444)得出了一个四因素结构,这一结构得到了 CFA(子样本 B,n=388)的证实。这四个因素分别是“外化行为”(变量 13.16%)、“同伴关系困难”(变量 11.10%)、“家庭冲突”(变量 8.32%)和“缺乏家庭协商”(变量 7.11%),且具有良好的内部一致性(所有α≥0.65)。在四个因素的相关模式上,男性和女性存在差异。FPEB 各因素也具有良好的同时效度:四个因素中的两个(“缺乏家庭协商”和“外化行为”)和量表的总分与“道德脱离量表”相关,而同伴关系困难则不相关。进一步的分析还显示了性别差异(除了“同伴关系困难”)以及学生的学校表现与“外化行为”、“家庭冲突”和 FPEB 总分之间的关联。我们得出结论,FPEB 是一种有用的工具,可以评估风险和保护因素,并计划有针对性的干预措施(侧重于特定领域)。还讨论了限制和进一步改进的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b84c/7967447/8958bd50b8cd/ijerph-18-02724-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验