Palco Michelangelo, Fenga Domenico, Basile Giorgio Carmelo, Rizzo Paolo, Cavalieri Bruno, Leonetti Danilo, Alito Angelo, Bruschetta Antongiulio, Traina Francesco
Department of Biomedical, Dental and Morphological and Functional Images, Section of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy.
Department of Biomedical, Dental and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, 98124 Messina, Italy.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Mar 3;57(3):232. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030232.
: Knee osteoarthritis (KO) is one of the most common joint diseases, determining knee pain and reduction of mobility, with a negative effect on quality of life. Intra-articular injections of different formulations of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are an increasingly common non-surgical treatment for KO. Recently, in order to combine the anti-inflammatory effect of platelet rich plasma and the viscosupplementation effect of hyaluronic acid, a formulation of PRP combined with hyaluronic acid (PRP + HA) has been proposed. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively compare the effectiveness of plasma with high concentration of platelets and leukocytes (L-PRP) with PRP + HA in patients with mild to moderate (Kellgren-Lawrence scale II-III grade) KO. : Among the 51 patients included, 28 have been treated with L-PRP, while 23 with PRP + HA. A retrospective evaluation at baseline (T0), after 3 months (T1) and 1 year (T2) has been performed. The outcome analyzed are the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Visuo Analogic Scale (VAS) (at T0, T1, and T2) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) (T0 and T2). We evaluated change in mean scores within and between groups among different time points using repeated measures ANCOVA. : Although the two treatments have been both effective in reducing VAS, the group treated with PRP + HA showed a significantly lower KSS. : Our results show that the use of both treatments may help to reduce pain in patients with mild to moderate KO. PRP + HA showed better results in improving knee mobility and function. These results should be considered only preliminary: Further research is needed to completely describe the clinical effectiveness of these formulations.
膝关节骨关节炎(KO)是最常见的关节疾病之一,会导致膝关节疼痛和活动能力下降,对生活质量产生负面影响。关节腔内注射不同配方的富血小板血浆(PRP)是一种越来越常见的KO非手术治疗方法。最近,为了将富血小板血浆的抗炎作用与透明质酸的粘弹性补充作用相结合,有人提出了一种PRP与透明质酸联合的配方(PRP + HA)。本研究的目的是回顾性比较高浓度血小板和白细胞血浆(L-PRP)与PRP + HA在轻度至中度(Kellgren-Lawrence量表II-III级)KO患者中的有效性。:在纳入的51例患者中,28例接受了L-PRP治疗,而23例接受了PRP + HA治疗。在基线(T0)、3个月后(T1)和1年(T2)进行了回顾性评估。分析的结果指标是膝关节协会评分(KSS)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)(在T0、T1和T2时)以及膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)(T0和T2)。我们使用重复测量协方差分析评估了不同时间点组内和组间平均评分的变化。:尽管两种治疗在降低VAS方面均有效,但接受PRP + HA治疗的组KSS显著更低。:我们的结果表明,两种治疗方法都可能有助于减轻轻度至中度KO患者的疼痛。PRP + HA在改善膝关节活动度和功能方面显示出更好的效果。这些结果应仅被视为初步结果:需要进一步研究来全面描述这些配方的临床有效性。