Mathioudakis Alexander G, Ghrew Murad, Ustianowski Andrew, Ahmad Shazaad, Borrow Ray, Papavasileiou Lida Pieretta, Petrakis Dimitrios, Bakerly Nawar Diar
Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK.
North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M23 9LT, UK.
Life (Basel). 2021 Mar 17;11(3):249. doi: 10.3390/life11030249.
An online survey was conducted to compare the safety, tolerability and reactogenicity of available COVID-19 vaccines in different recipient groups. This survey was launched in February 2021 and ran for 11 days. Recipients of a first COVID-19 vaccine dose ≥7 days prior to survey completion were eligible. The incidence and severity of vaccination side effects were assessed. The survey was completed by 2002 respondents of whom 26.6% had a prior COVID-19 infection. A prior COVID-19 infection was associated with an increased risk of any side effect (risk ratio 1.08, 95% confidence intervals (1.05-1.11)), fever (2.24 (1.86-2.70)), breathlessness (2.05 (1.28-3.29)), flu-like illness (1.78 (1.51-2.10)), fatigue (1.34 (1.20-1.49)) and local reactions (1.10 (1.06-1.15)). It was also associated with an increased risk of severe side effects leading to hospital care (1.56 (1.14-2.12)). While mRNA vaccines were associated with a higher incidence of any side effect (1.06 (1.01-1.11)) compared with viral vector-based vaccines, these were generally milder ( < 0.001), mostly local reactions. Importantly, mRNA vaccine recipients reported a considerably lower incidence of systemic reactions (RR < 0.6) including anaphylaxis, swelling, flu-like illness, breathlessness and fatigue and of side effects requiring hospital care (0.42 (0.31-0.58)). Our study confirms the findings of recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrating that COVID-19 vaccines are generally safe with limited severe side effects. For the first time, our study links prior COVID-19 illness with an increased incidence of vaccination side effects and demonstrates that mRNA vaccines cause milder, less frequent systemic side effects but more local reactions.
开展了一项在线调查,以比较现有新冠疫苗在不同接种人群中的安全性、耐受性和反应原性。该调查于2021年2月启动,持续了11天。在调查完成前至少7天接种第一剂新冠疫苗的接种者符合条件。对接种疫苗副作用的发生率和严重程度进行了评估。共有2002名受访者完成了调查,其中26.6%曾感染过新冠病毒。既往感染新冠病毒与出现任何副作用的风险增加相关(风险比1.08,95%置信区间[1.05 - 1.11]),包括发热(2.24[1.86 - 2.70])、呼吸急促(2.05[1.28 - 3.29])、流感样疾病(1.78[1.51 - 2.10])、疲劳(1.34[1.20 - 1.49])和局部反应(1.10[1.06 - 1.15])。它还与导致住院治疗的严重副作用风险增加相关(1.56[1.14 - 2.12])。与基于病毒载体的疫苗相比,mRNA疫苗出现任何副作用的发生率更高(1.06[1.01 - 1.11]),但这些副作用通常较轻(<0.001),大多为局部反应。重要的是,mRNA疫苗接种者报告的全身反应(风险比<0.6)发生率显著较低,包括过敏反应、肿胀、流感样疾病、呼吸急促和疲劳,以及需要住院治疗的副作用(0.42[0.31 - 0.58])。我们的研究证实了近期随机对照试验(RCT)的结果,表明新冠疫苗总体安全,严重副作用有限。我们的研究首次将既往新冠病毒感染与接种疫苗副作用发生率增加联系起来,并表明mRNA疫苗引起的全身副作用较轻、频率较低,但局部反应较多。