• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

立陶宛公众对药物不良反应看法的定性研究

Qualitative Study of General Public Views towards Adverse Drug Reactions in Lithuania.

作者信息

Valinciute-Jankauskiene Agne, Loreta Kubiliene

机构信息

Department of Drug Technology and Social Pharmacy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Sukileliu Ave. 13, LT-50166 Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 9;9(3):303. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030303.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare9030303
PMID:33803215
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8001150/
Abstract

Direct patient reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is available in many countries, as patients are often knowledgeable about their health conditions and medicines. This study aimed to assess whether patients can recognize ADRs and whether they know how to proceed with ADR reporting. The study also assesses ADR information sources and the main barriers to reporting. Through the purposive and snowball sampling techniques, 42 consumers participated in focus group discussions. All discussions were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed for thematic content analysis. The thematic content analysis yielded four major themes: knowledge about medication safety, ADRs, and pharmacovigilance; information sources about medicines and ADRs; knowledge about ADR reporting; attitudes towards ADR reporting; benefits of ADR reporting; barriers to ADR reporting. Participants were able to identify ADRs and used different information sources about medicines and ADRs to confirm their beliefs. However, the poor communication between consumers, pharmacists, and physicians is the main barrier to ADR reporting. This study identified the challenges in relation to pharmacovigilance in Lithuania from patients' perspectives. Our study indicated a lack of clearly set standards and communication guidelines between patients, physicians, and pharmacists. Active pharmacovigilance might help develop consumer habits regarding the reporting of ADRs in the presence of spontaneous pharmacovigilance.

摘要

在许多国家,患者可直接报告药物不良反应(ADR),因为患者通常了解自身健康状况和所服用的药物。本研究旨在评估患者是否能够识别药物不良反应,以及他们是否知道如何进行药物不良反应报告。该研究还评估了药物不良反应的信息来源以及报告的主要障碍。通过目的抽样和滚雪球抽样技术,42名消费者参与了焦点小组讨论。所有讨论均进行了录音,逐字转录,并进行了主题内容分析。主题内容分析产生了四个主要主题:药物安全性、药物不良反应和药物警戒知识;药物和药物不良反应的信息来源;药物不良反应报告知识;对药物不良反应报告的态度;药物不良反应报告的益处;药物不良反应报告的障碍。参与者能够识别药物不良反应,并使用关于药物和药物不良反应的不同信息来源来证实他们的看法。然而,消费者、药剂师和医生之间沟通不畅是药物不良反应报告的主要障碍。本研究从患者角度确定了立陶宛在药物警戒方面的挑战。我们的研究表明,患者、医生和药剂师之间缺乏明确制定的标准和沟通指南。在自发药物警戒的情况下,积极的药物警戒可能有助于培养消费者报告药物不良反应的习惯。

相似文献

1
Qualitative Study of General Public Views towards Adverse Drug Reactions in Lithuania.立陶宛公众对药物不良反应看法的定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 9;9(3):303. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9030303.
2
Knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reaction reporting among physicians and pharmacists in Egypt: a step toward personalized medicine implementation.埃及医生和药剂师在药物警戒和药物不良反应报告方面的知识、态度和实践:迈向个体化医学实施的一步。
Per Med. 2022 Nov;19(6):495-507. doi: 10.2217/pme-2022-0030. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
3
Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.评估患者向英国“黄卡计划”报告药物不良反应的情况:文献回顾、描述性和定性分析以及问卷调查。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15(20):1-234, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15200.
4
Qualitative Study of Community Pharmacists' and General Practitioners' Views toward Pharmacovigilance in Lithuania.立陶宛社区药剂师和全科医生对药物警戒看法的定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 20;9(8):1072. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9081072.
5
Community Pharmacists' Views and Experiences with ADR Reporting for Complementary Medicines: A Qualitative Study in New Zealand.社区药剂师对补充药物不良反应报告的看法和经验:新西兰的一项定性研究。
Drug Saf. 2020 Nov;43(11):1157-1170. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00980-x.
6
A qualitative exploration of knowledge, attitudes and practices of hospital pharmacists towards adverse drug reaction reporting system in Lahore, Pakistan.巴基斯坦拉合尔医院药剂师对药物不良反应报告系统的知识、态度和实践的定性探索
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2018 Jul 19;11:16. doi: 10.1186/s40545-018-0143-0. eCollection 2018.
7
Physicians' Understanding and Practices of Pharmacovigilance: Qualitative Experience from A Lower Middle-Income Country.医生对药物警戒的理解和实践:来自一个中下等收入国家的定性经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 25;17(7):2209. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072209.
8
Are consumers ready to take part in the Pharmacovigilance System?--a Portuguese preliminary study concerning ADR reporting.消费者准备好参与药物警戒系统了吗?——一项关于药品不良反应报告的葡萄牙初步研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;71(7):883-90. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1867-2. Epub 2015 May 26.
9
Reporting, Monitoring, and Handling of Adverse Drug Reactions in Australia: Scoping Review.澳大利亚药物不良反应报告、监测和处理:范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jan 16;9:e40080. doi: 10.2196/40080.
10
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting among the General Public in Lithuania: A Cross-Sectional Study.立陶宛公众中的药物警戒与药品不良反应报告:一项横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 14;11(8):1133. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081133.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness and Attitudes Regarding Adverse Drug Events and Reporting in South Africa.南非对药物不良事件及报告的认知与态度
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00795-x.
2
Assessment of public awareness and perspectives towards adverse drug reaction reporting system in Karachi, Pakistan.巴基斯坦卡拉奇市公众对药品不良反应报告系统的认知及看法评估
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 10;20(2):e0318139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318139. eCollection 2025.
3
Views on Suspected Adverse Drug Events in Older Adults with Chronic Conditions: A Qualitative Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety profile of biologic drugs for psoriasis in clinical practice: An Italian prospective pharmacovigilance study.临床实践中生物药物治疗银屑病的安全性:一项意大利前瞻性药物警戒研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 3;15(11):e0241575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241575. eCollection 2020.
2
Public awareness and perception toward Adverse Drug Reactions reporting in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得市公众对药品不良反应报告的认知与看法。
Saudi Pharm J. 2017 Sep;25(6):868-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
3
Factors affecting patient reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review.
慢性病老年患者疑似药物不良事件的观点:一项定性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Aug 18;17:2051-2061. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S420620. eCollection 2023.
4
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting among the General Public in Lithuania: A Cross-Sectional Study.立陶宛公众中的药物警戒与药品不良反应报告:一项横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 14;11(8):1133. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081133.
影响患者药物不良反应报告的因素:一项系统评价
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr;83(4):875-883. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13159. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
4
Public confidence in ADR identification and their views on ADRreporting: mixed methods study.公众对药品不良反应识别的信心及其对药品不良反应报告的看法:混合方法研究
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;73(2):223-231. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2155-5. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
5
A qualitative study exploring medicines use pattern and practice among general public in Malaysia.一项探索马来西亚普通民众用药模式与实践的定性研究。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2016 Apr-Jun;14(2):740. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2016.02.740. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
6
Are consumers ready to take part in the Pharmacovigilance System?--a Portuguese preliminary study concerning ADR reporting.消费者准备好参与药物警戒系统了吗?——一项关于药品不良反应报告的葡萄牙初步研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;71(7):883-90. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1867-2. Epub 2015 May 26.
7
ADR Reporting by the General Public: Lessons Learnt from the Dutch and Swedish Systems.公众药品不良反应报告:荷兰和瑞典系统的经验教训
Drug Saf. 2015 Apr;38(4):337-47. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0264-1.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
9
Effects of and satisfaction with short message service reminders for patient medication adherence: a randomized controlled study.短信提醒对患者用药依从性的影响和满意度:一项随机对照研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Nov 16;13:127. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-127.
10
Adverse drug reactions reporting : Knowledge and opinion of general public in Penang, Malaysia.药物不良反应报告:马来西亚槟城公众的知识与看法。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013 Jul;5(3):224-8. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.116824.