Suppr超能文献

透明质酸钠滴眼液治疗干眼症疗效的Meta分析

A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid Eye Drops for the Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome.

作者信息

Yang Yun-Jung, Lee Won-Young, Kim Young-Jin, Hong Yeon-Pyo

机构信息

Institute of Biomedical Science, Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon 22711, Korea.

Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;18(5):2383. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052383.

Abstract

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is commonly used for treating dry eye syndrome (DES). This meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacies of HA- and non-HA-based eye drops, including saline and conventional artificial tears (ATs), for the treatment of dry eye disease. Eight databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, DBpia, KoreaMed, KMBASE, RISS, KISS) were searched for studies comparing the efficacies of HA- and non-HA-based ATs in patients with DES published up to September 2020. Two independent reviewers assessed the quality and extracted the relevant data. The mean differences of Schirmer's (SH) test scores, tear breakup times (TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining scores (Oxford scale, 0-4), and ocular surface disease indexes were calculated. The standard mean difference and 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random effect model. Nineteen studies, including 2078 cases, were included. HA eye drops significantly improved tear production compared with non-HA-based eye drops (standard mean difference (SMD) 0.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03, 0.33). In a subgroup analysis, the SH test scores and TBUT values after using HA significantly increased compared to those measured after using saline (SMD 0.27; 95% CI 0.05, 0.49 and SMD 0.28; 95% CI 0.03, 0.52, respectively). Based on these results, HA eye drops may be superior to non-HA eye drops including normal saline and ATs. Further research is needed to assess the efficacies stratified by age, treatment duration, the severity of dry eye, and optimal dosages.

摘要

透明质酸(HA)常用于治疗干眼症(DES)。本荟萃分析旨在比较基于HA的眼药水与非HA眼药水(包括生理盐水和传统人工泪液(ATs))治疗干眼症的疗效。检索了八个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、DBpia、KoreaMed、KMBASE、RISS、KISS),以查找截至2020年9月发表的比较基于HA和非HA的ATs对DES患者疗效的研究。两名独立评审员评估了质量并提取了相关数据。计算了施密特(SH)试验评分、泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)、角膜荧光素染色评分(牛津量表,0 - 4)和眼表疾病指数的平均差异。使用随机效应模型计算标准平均差异和95%置信区间。纳入了19项研究,共2078例病例。与非HA眼药水相比,HA眼药水显著改善了泪液分泌(标准平均差异(SMD)0.18;95%置信区间(CI)0.03,0.33)。在亚组分析中,使用HA后的SH试验评分和TBUT值与使用生理盐水后测量的值相比显著增加(分别为SMD 0.27;95% CI 0.05,0.49和SMD 0.28;95% CI 0.03,0.52)。基于这些结果,HA眼药水可能优于包括生理盐水和ATs在内的非HA眼药水。需要进一步研究以评估按年龄、治疗持续时间、干眼症严重程度和最佳剂量分层的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f18/7967738/1a1de6bd1725/ijerph-18-02383-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验