• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在临床实践中使用标准化和非标准化工具测量跌倒风险和独立性。

Use of Standardized and Non-Standardized Tools for Measuring the Risk of Falls and Independence in Clinical Practice.

机构信息

Institute of Nursing Midwifery and Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, 370 11 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 20;18(6):3226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063226.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18063226
PMID:33804715
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8004039/
Abstract

(1) Background: The use of standardized tools is regarded as the basis for an evidence-based assessment. The tools enable monitoring of complex events and the effectiveness of adopted interventions. Some healthcare facilities use standardized tools such as the Morse Fall Scale, but many use non-standardized tools created based on patient needs. Our study question was, why are non-standardized tools used when standardized tools are more beneficial and can be statistically evaluated and compared to other results; (2) Methods: We used a quantitative, non-standardized questionnaire to survey 1200 nurses, which was representative sample for the entire Czech Republic. All questionnaires were assessed in two phases (a) the frequency evaluation and descriptive analysis, and (b) hypotheses testing and correlation analyses; (3) Results: We found that the Conley Scale, Barthel test, and IADL test were preferred by many nurses. Furthermore, we found that nurses using standardized assessment scales noticed risk factors significantly more frequently but regarded the increased complexity of care to be psychologically demanding. (4) Conclusions: In patients with physical disabilities, both types of tools (internal non-standardized and standardized) are used to assess the risk of falls and independence; nurses generally welcomed the increase use of standardized tools in their facilities.

摘要

(1) 背景:标准化工具的使用被视为循证评估的基础。这些工具能够监测复杂事件和已采取干预措施的效果。一些医疗机构使用标准化工具,如 Morse 跌倒量表,但许多机构使用根据患者需求创建的非标准化工具。我们的研究问题是,为什么在标准化工具更有益且可以进行统计评估并与其他结果进行比较的情况下,使用非标准化工具;(2) 方法:我们使用定量、非标准化问卷对整个捷克共和国的 1200 名护士进行了代表性抽样调查。所有问卷都分两个阶段进行评估(a) 频率评估和描述性分析,以及(b) 假设检验和相关分析;(3) 结果:我们发现许多护士更喜欢 Conley 量表、Barthel 测试和 IADL 测试。此外,我们发现使用标准化评估量表的护士更频繁地注意到风险因素,但认为增加护理的复杂性在心理上具有挑战性。(4) 结论:在身体残疾患者中,两种类型的工具(内部非标准化和标准化)都用于评估跌倒和独立性的风险;护士普遍欢迎在其机构中增加使用标准化工具。

相似文献

1
Use of Standardized and Non-Standardized Tools for Measuring the Risk of Falls and Independence in Clinical Practice.在临床实践中使用标准化和非标准化工具测量跌倒风险和独立性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 20;18(6):3226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063226.
2
Prevention of patient falls in hospitals in the Czech Republic.捷克共和国医院中患者跌倒的预防
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2015;36 Suppl 2:23-8.
3
Relationship between occurrence of falls and fall-risk scores in an acute care setting using the Hendrich II fall risk model.在急性护理环境中使用亨德里希二世跌倒风险模型时跌倒发生率与跌倒风险评分之间的关系。
Medsurg Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;22(3):180-7.
4
Frequencies of falls in Swiss hospitals: concordance between nurses' estimates and fall incident reports.瑞士医院跌倒频率:护士估计与跌倒事件报告的一致性。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Feb;46(2):164-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Nov 4.
5
[Evaluation of 2 tools for measuring the risk of falls among patients].[两种用于评估患者跌倒风险工具的评价]
Assist Inferm Ric. 2002 Jul-Sep;21(3):117-24.
6
Current approaches to postfall assessment in nursing homes.养老院跌倒后评估的当前方法。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2004 Nov-Dec;5(6):387-94. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000144552.87638.66.
7
[Scale Mosaic: definition and testing of a tool for assessing the risk of falling and the care planning during hospitalization].[量表式综合评估:一种用于评估住院期间跌倒风险及护理计划的工具的定义与测试]
Prof Inferm. 2014 Apr-Jun;67(2):95-105. doi: 10.7429/pi.2014.672095.
8
Effectiveness of patient-centered interventions on falls in the acute care setting compared to usual care: a systematic review.与常规护理相比,以患者为中心的干预措施对急性护理环境中跌倒的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Dec;15(12):3006-3048. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003331.
9
Opinions regarding the effectiveness of non-pharmacological measures in prevention of cardiovascular disease in the Czech Republic.关于捷克共和国非药物措施在预防心血管疾病方面有效性的观点。
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2016 Dec;37(suppl 2):32-38.
10
Using a Medical Intranet of Things System to Prevent Bed Falls in an Acute Care Hospital: A Pilot Study.使用医疗物联网系统预防急症医院的跌倒:一项试点研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 4;19(5):e150. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7131.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of psychometric properties of instruments for measuring health system literacy: A systematic review study protocol using COSMIN guidelines.测量卫生系统素养工具的心理测量特性评估:一项使用COSMIN指南的系统评价研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 14;15(9):e102788. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102788.
2
Semantic Evaluation of Nursing Assessment Scales Translations by ChatGPT 4.0: A Lexicometric Analysis.ChatGPT 4.0对护理评估量表翻译的语义评估:词汇计量分析
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 11;15(6):211. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15060211.
3
Assessing Perceptions and Behaviors Related to Vaping Nicotine: The Nicotine Addiction Perceptions Scale.评估与吸电子烟尼古丁相关的认知和行为:尼古丁成瘾认知量表。
Tob Use Insights. 2025 Apr 26;18:1179173X251336468. doi: 10.1177/1179173X251336468. eCollection 2025.
4
Utilizing Balance Assessment Tools by Physical Therapists for Patients with Balance Disorders.物理治疗师使用平衡评估工具评估平衡障碍患者。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;13(8):928. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080928.
5
The effect of nurse health literacy interventions on patient health literacy scores in specialty consultations: a quasi-experimental study.专科会诊中护士健康素养干预对患者健康素养得分的影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 25;23(1):786. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02447-1.
6
Novel Approach to Personalized Physician Recommendations Using Semantic Features and Response Metrics: Model Evaluation Study.使用语义特征和响应指标的个性化医生推荐新方法:模型评估研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 15;11:e57670. doi: 10.2196/57670.
7
The Importance of Standardized Assessment.标准化评估的重要性。
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2024 Dec;11 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S15-S20. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.14085. Epub 2024 May 26.
8
Influence of severity of illnesses on risk of death in intensive care unit patients with severity of pressure injuries as mediating variable.重症监护病房患者严重压疮严重程度对病死率的影响,压疮严重程度为中介变量。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14623. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14623. Epub 2023 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment tools to evaluate Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) in older adults: A systematic review.评估老年人日常生活活动(ADL)和工具性日常生活活动(IADL)的评估工具:一项系统综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Apr 13;34:33. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.33. eCollection 2020.
2
Is Barthel Index Suitable for Assessing Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Dementia?巴氏指数是否适用于评估痴呆患者的日常生活活动能力?
Front Psychiatry. 2020 May 8;11:282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00282. eCollection 2020.
3
The implementation of the nursing process in lower-income countries: An integrative review.低收入国家护理程序的实施:一项综合综述。
Nurs Open. 2019 Nov 1;7(1):42-57. doi: 10.1002/nop2.410. eCollection 2020 Jan.
4
Nursing assessment and management of incontinence among medical and surgical adult patients in a tertiary hospital: a best practice implementation project.三级医院成年内科和外科患者失禁的护理评估与管理:最佳实践实施项目
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Dec;17(12):2578-2590. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00110.
5
Resilience of auxiliary nurses providing nursing care to patients with intellectual disabilities at a public mental healthcare institution.在一家公立精神卫生保健机构为智障患者提供护理服务的助理护士的适应能力。
Curationis. 2019 Aug 20;42(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v42i1.1954.
6
Risk Factors for Falls in Hospital In-Patients: A Prospective Nested Case Control Study.住院患者跌倒的危险因素:一项前瞻性巢式病例对照研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 May 1;8(5):300-306. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.11.
7
Relationships between occupational therapy students' understandings of disability and disability attitudes.职业治疗专业学生对残疾的理解与残疾态度之间的关系。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2020 Feb;27(2):122-132. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2019.1596310. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
8
Assessment of patient information needs: A systematic review of measures.患者信息需求评估:测量方法的系统评价
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 31;14(1):e0209165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209165. eCollection 2019.
9
Nurses' experiences of caring for patients with intellectual developmental disorders: a systematic review using a meta-ethnographic approach.护士照顾智力发育障碍患者的经历:一项采用元民族志方法的系统综述。
BMC Nurs. 2018 Dec 3;17:51. doi: 10.1186/s12912-018-0316-9. eCollection 2018.
10
Disabled people's experiences of accessing reasonable adjustments in hospitals: a qualitative study.残疾人在医院获得合理调整的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):931. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3757-7.