Albalwi Abdulaziz A, Alharbi Ahmad A, Al Amer Hamad S, Alamrani Samia A, Albalawi Hani F, Alatawi Maryam K, Albalawi Wahaj A, Albalawi Basmah A, Qari Amani M, Alatawi Waad A, Javid Jamsheed
Department of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;13(8):928. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080928.
Physical therapists' use of various balance assessment tools is essential for accurately identifying deficits and guiding rehabilitation plans. This study aimed to investigate clinical balance assessment practices in Saudi Arabia, examine physical therapists' preferences for different balance assessment tools, and analyze how participant characteristics-such as age, experience, and practice setting-affect these preferences. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between April and July 2024 in Saudi Arabia. A total of 194 physical therapists (62.9% male; 45.9% with 1-5 years of experience) who actively manage individuals with balance disorders were recruited using a convenience sampling technique. Data were collected through a self-structured questionnaire. Participants reported their use of balance assessment tools on a six-point Likert scale, incorporating both numeric and descriptive anchors. The Single-Leg Stance was the most regularly used tool (54.6%), followed by the Berg Balance Scale and Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) (both 43.8%). Conversely, tools such as the Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (68.1%), Mini Balance Evaluation System (65.4%), and Fall Efficacy Scale International (56.2%) were the most underutilized. Significant associations were observed between tool preferences and participant characteristics, including area of practice, academic qualification, experience level, and work environment ( < 0.05). However, several validated assessment tools remain underutilized, highlighting gaps in awareness and training. The findings of this study highlight the need for greater standardization in balance assessment practices. Improving training programs, establishing clear clinical guidelines, and standardizing assessment protocols across healthcare settings can help make balance evaluations more consistent and effective.
物理治疗师使用各种平衡评估工具对于准确识别缺陷和指导康复计划至关重要。本研究旨在调查沙特阿拉伯的临床平衡评估实践,检查物理治疗师对不同平衡评估工具的偏好,并分析参与者特征(如年龄、经验和执业环境)如何影响这些偏好。2024年4月至7月在沙特阿拉伯进行了一项描述性横断面研究。采用便利抽样技术招募了194名积极管理平衡障碍患者的物理治疗师(62.9%为男性;45.9%有1 - 5年经验)。通过自行编制的问卷收集数据。参与者用六点李克特量表报告他们对平衡评估工具的使用情况,量表包含数字和描述性锚点。单腿站立是最常用的工具(54.6%),其次是伯格平衡量表和功能性步态评估(FGA)(均为43.8%)。相反,诸如性能导向移动性评估(68.1%)、迷你平衡评估系统(65.4%)和国际跌倒效能量表(56.2%)等工具使用最少。在工具偏好与参与者特征之间观察到显著关联,包括执业领域、学历、经验水平和工作环境(<0.05)。然而,一些经过验证的评估工具仍未得到充分利用,凸显了认识和培训方面的差距。本研究结果强调了平衡评估实践中需要更大程度的标准化。改进培训项目、制定明确的临床指南以及在各医疗机构规范评估方案有助于使平衡评估更加一致和有效。