• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成本分担变化对加泰罗尼亚地区处方药和非处方药消费的影响。

The Effect of Changes in Cost Sharing on the Consumption of Prescription and Over-the-Counter Medicines in Catalonia.

作者信息

Martínez-Jiménez Mario, García-Gómez Pilar, Puig-Junoy Jaume

机构信息

Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health & Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4AT, UK.

Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 4;18(5):2562. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052562.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18052562
PMID:33806543
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7967646/
Abstract

Many universal health care systems have increased the share of the price of medicines paid by the patient to reduce the cost pressure faced after the Great Recession. This paper assesses the impact of cost-sharing changes on the propensity to consume prescription and over-the-counter medicines in Catalonia, a Spanish autonomous community, affected by three new cost-sharing policies implemented in 2012. We applied a quasi-experimental difference-in-difference method using data from 2010 to 2014. These reforms were heterogeneous across different groups of individuals, so we define three intervention groups: (i) middle-income working population-co-insurance rate changed from 40% to 50%; (ii) low/middle-income pensioners-from free full coverage to 10% co-insurance rate; (iii) unemployed individuals without benefits-from 40% co-insurance rate to free full coverage. Our control group was the low-income working population whose co-insurance rate remained unchanged. We estimated the effects on the overall population as well as on the group with long-term care needs. We evaluated the effect of these changes on the propensity to consume prescription or over-the-counter medicines, and explored the heterogeneity effects across seven therapeutic groups of prescription medicines. Our findings showed that, on average, these changes did not significantly change the propensity to consume prescription or over-the-counter medicines. Nonetheless, we observed that the propensity to consume prescription medicines for mental disorders significantly increased among unemployed without benefits, while the consumption of prescribed mental disorders medicines for low/middle-income pensioners with long-term care needs decreased after becoming no longer free. We conclude that the propensity to consume medicines was not affected by the new cost-sharing policies, except for mental disorders. However, our results do not preclude potential changes in the quantity of medicines individuals consume.

摘要

许多全民医疗保健系统提高了患者支付药品价格的份额,以减轻大衰退后面临的成本压力。本文评估了成本分担变化对加泰罗尼亚(西班牙的一个自治区)处方药和非处方药消费倾向的影响,该地区在2012年实施了三项新的成本分担政策。我们采用了一种准实验性的差分法,使用了2010年至2014年的数据。这些改革在不同个体群体中存在差异,因此我们定义了三个干预组:(i)中等收入在职人群——共付率从40%变为50%;(ii)中低收入养老金领取者——从免费全额覆盖变为10%的共付率;(iii)无福利的失业人员——从40%的共付率变为免费全额覆盖。我们的对照组是共付率保持不变的低收入在职人群。我们估计了这些变化对总体人群以及有长期护理需求人群的影响。我们评估了这些变化对处方药或非处方药消费倾向的影响,并探讨了七个处方药治疗组之间的异质性影响。我们的研究结果表明,总体而言,这些变化并没有显著改变处方药或非处方药的消费倾向。尽管如此,我们观察到,无福利的失业人员中,精神障碍处方药的消费倾向显著增加,而对于有长期护理需求的中低收入养老金领取者,在不再免费后,精神障碍处方药的消费减少。我们得出结论,除了精神障碍药物外,药品消费倾向不受新成本分担政策的影响。然而,我们的结果并不排除个体药品消费量的潜在变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28eb/7967646/8ea60aad7ed0/ijerph-18-02562-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28eb/7967646/368f0c5705d1/ijerph-18-02562-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28eb/7967646/8ea60aad7ed0/ijerph-18-02562-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28eb/7967646/368f0c5705d1/ijerph-18-02562-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28eb/7967646/8ea60aad7ed0/ijerph-18-02562-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Changes in Cost Sharing on the Consumption of Prescription and Over-the-Counter Medicines in Catalonia.成本分担变化对加泰罗尼亚地区处方药和非处方药消费的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 4;18(5):2562. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052562.
2
Paying for formerly free medicines in Spain after 1 year of co-payment: changes in the number of dispensed prescriptions.西班牙在实行一年的自付费用政策后,为原本免费的药物付费:配药处方数量的变化。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Jun;12(3):279-87. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0097-6.
3
The effect of a change in co-payment on prescription drug demand in a National Health System: The case of 15 drug families by price elasticity of demand.国家卫生系统中共同支付变化对处方药需求的影响:按需求价格弹性划分的 15 种药物家族案例。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 27;14(3):e0213403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213403. eCollection 2019.
4
Physician and Patient Adjustment to Reference Pricing for Drugs.医生和患者对药品参考定价的调整。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920544. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20544.
5
Impact of cost sharing on prescription drugs used by Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的处方药费用分担的影响。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Jun;6(2):100-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 May 7.
6
Cost-Sharing Rates Increase During Deep Recession: Preliminary Data From Greece.费用分担率在深度衰退期间上升:来自希腊的初步数据。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 May 28;5(12):687-692. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.62.
7
Does €1 Per Prescription Make a Difference? Impact of a Capped Low-Intensity Pharmaceutical Co-Payment.每处方收费 1 欧元是否有影响?低强度药品共付额封顶的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Jun;16(3):407-414. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0382-x.
8
The impact of co-payment increases on dispensings of government-subsidised medicines in Australia.澳大利亚自付费用增加对政府补贴药品配药的影响。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Nov;17(11):1091-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.1670.
9
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational drug use.药品政策:封顶支付和共付额对合理用药的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.
10
The impact of prescription drug co-payments for publicly insured families.参保家庭处方药共付额的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Mar;21(2):261-274. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01125-3. Epub 2019 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of a change in co-payment on prescription drug demand in a National Health System: The case of 15 drug families by price elasticity of demand.国家卫生系统中共同支付变化对处方药需求的影响:按需求价格弹性划分的 15 种药物家族案例。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 27;14(3):e0213403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213403. eCollection 2019.
2
Does €1 Per Prescription Make a Difference? Impact of a Capped Low-Intensity Pharmaceutical Co-Payment.每处方收费 1 欧元是否有影响?低强度药品共付额封顶的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Jun;16(3):407-414. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0382-x.
3
Effect of copayment policies on initial medication non-adherence according to income: a population-based study.
按收入划分的共付政策对初始药物治疗不依从性的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Nov;27(11):878-891. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007416. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
4
Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research.设计双重差分研究:公共卫生政策研究的最佳实践。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:453-469. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013507. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
5
[Impact of the Pharmaceutical Copayment Reform on the Use of Antidiabetics, Antithrombotics and for Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease Agents, Spain].[西班牙药品自付费用改革对降糖药、抗血栓药及慢性阻塞性气道疾病用药使用情况的影响]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2016 Apr 29;90:E6.
6
Free Medicines Thanks to Retirement: Impact of Coinsurance Exemption on Pharmaceutical Expenditures and Hospitalization Offsets in a national health service.退休后可享免费药物:在国家医疗服务体系中,共付保险豁免对药品支出和住院费用抵消的影响
Health Econ. 2016 Jun;25(6):750-67. doi: 10.1002/hec.3182. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
7
[Impact of the Royal Decree-Law 16/2012 on the number of prescriptions and pharmaceutical expenditures].[2012年第16号皇家法令对处方数量和药品支出的影响]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2014 Mar-Apr;88(2):233-49. doi: 10.4321/S1135-57272014000200006.
8
Paying for formerly free medicines in Spain after 1 year of co-payment: changes in the number of dispensed prescriptions.西班牙在实行一年的自付费用政策后,为原本免费的药物付费:配药处方数量的变化。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Jun;12(3):279-87. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0097-6.
9
A systematic review of cost-sharing strategies used within publicly-funded drug plans in member countries of the organisation for economic co-operation and development.对经济合作与发展组织成员国公共资助药品计划中使用的费用分担策略的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 11;9(3):e90434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090434. eCollection 2014.
10
Evolutions in both co-payment and generic market share for common medication in the Belgian reference pricing system.比利时参考定价系统中常见药物的共付额和仿制药市场份额的演变。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Oct;11(5):543-52. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0054-9.