Alghamdi Saleh, Barakat Bassant, Berrou Ilhem, Alzahrani Abdulhakim, Haseeb Abdul, Hammad Mohamed Anwar, Anwar Sirajudheen, Sindi Abdulmajeed Abdulghani A, Almasmoum Hussain A, Albanghali Mohammad
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Clinical Pharmacy, Albaha University, Albaha 57911, Saudi Arabia.
School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Staple Hill, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Mar 31;10(4):365. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10040365.
The aim of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine-based regimens versus standard treatment in patients with the coronavirus disease admitted in 2019 to a hospital in Saudi Arabia. A comparative observational study, using routine hospital data, was carried out in a large tertiary care hospital in Al Baha, Saudi Arabia, providing care to patients with COVID-19 between April 2019 and August 2019. Patients were categorized into two groups: the Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) group, treated with HCQ in a dose of 400 mg twice daily on the first day, followed by 200 mg twice daily; the non HCQ group, treated with other antiviral or antibacterial treatments according to protocols recommended by the Ministry of Health (MOH) at the time. The primary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, need for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), time in ICU, and need for mechanical ventilation. Overall survival was also assessed. 568 patients who received HCQ (treatment group) were compared with 207 patients who did not receive HCQ (control group). HCQ did not improve mortality in the treated group (7.7% vs. 7.2%). There were no significant differences in terms of duration of hospitalization, need for and time in ICU, and need for mechanical ventilation among the groups. Our study provides further evidence that HCQ treatment does not reduce mortality rates, length of hospital stay, admission and time in ICU, and need for mechanical ventilation in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
本研究旨在评估2019年在沙特阿拉伯一家医院收治的冠状病毒病患者中,基于羟氯喹的治疗方案与标准治疗相比的临床疗效。一项利用常规医院数据的比较性观察研究,在沙特阿拉伯巴哈的一家大型三级医疗医院开展,该医院在2019年4月至2019年8月期间为新冠肺炎患者提供治疗。患者被分为两组:羟氯喹(HCQ)组,第一天给予400毫克剂量的HCQ,每日两次,随后每日两次给予200毫克;非HCQ组,根据当时卫生部(MOH)推荐的方案接受其他抗病毒或抗菌治疗。主要结局指标为住院时间、入住重症监护病房(ICU)的需求、在ICU的时间以及机械通气的需求。还评估了总体生存率。将568例接受HCQ治疗的患者(治疗组)与207例未接受HCQ治疗的患者(对照组)进行比较。HCQ治疗组的死亡率并未改善(7.7%对7.2%)。各组在住院时间、入住ICU的需求和在ICU的时间以及机械通气的需求方面均无显著差异。我们的研究进一步证明,HCQ治疗并不能降低新冠肺炎住院患者的死亡率、住院时间、入住ICU的情况和在ICU的时间以及机械通气的需求。