Center for Defense Acquisition and Requirements Analysis, Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, Seoul 02455, Korea.
Department of Anatomy and Convergence Medical Science, Institute of Health Science, Bio Anti-Aging Medical Research Center, Gyeongsang National University Medical School, Jinju 52727, Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 31;18(7):3650. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073650.
The necessity for the aquatic ecological risk assessment for benzophenone-3 (BP-3) is increasing due to its high toxic potential and high detection frequency in freshwater. The initial step in the ecological risk assessment is to determine predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC). This study derived PNEC of BP-3 in freshwater using a species sensitivity distribution (SSD) approach, whilst existing PNECs are derived using assessment factor (AF) approaches. A total of eight chronic toxicity values, obtained by toxicity testing and a literature survey, covering four taxonomic classes (fish, crustaceans, algae, and cyanobacteria) were used for PNEC derivation. Therefore, the quantity and quality of the toxicity data met the minimum requirements for PNEC derivation using an SSD approach. The PNEC derived in this study (73.3 μg/L) was far higher than the environmental concentration detected in freshwater (up to 10.4 μg/L) as well as existing PNECs (0.67~1.8 μg/L), mainly due to the difference in the PNEC derivation methodology (i.e., AF vs. SSD approach). Since the SSD approach is regarded as more reliable than the AF approach, we recommend applying the PNEC value derived in this study for the aquatic ecological risk assessment of BP-3, as the use of the existing PNEC values seems to unnecessarily overestimate the potential ecological risk of BP-3 in freshwater.
由于苯甲酮-3(BP-3)具有高毒性潜力和在淡水中高检出频率,因此对其进行水生生态风险评估的必要性日益增加。生态风险评估的初始步骤是确定预测无效应浓度(PNEC)。本研究使用物种敏感性分布(SSD)方法,从淡水 BP-3 的 PNEC 推导得出,而现有的 PNEC 则是使用评估因子(AF)方法推导得出的。共有 8 个慢性毒性值,通过毒性测试和文献调查获得,涵盖四个分类群(鱼类、甲壳类动物、藻类和蓝藻),用于 PNEC 推导。因此,毒性数据的数量和质量符合使用 SSD 方法推导 PNEC 的最低要求。本研究推导出的 PNEC(73.3μg/L)远高于淡水环境中的检测浓度(高达 10.4μg/L)以及现有的 PNEC(0.67~1.8μg/L),主要是由于 PNEC 推导方法的差异(即 AF 与 SSD 方法)。由于 SSD 方法被认为比 AF 方法更可靠,因此我们建议在 BP-3 的水生生态风险评估中使用本研究推导出的 PNEC 值,因为使用现有的 PNEC 值似乎不必要地高估了 BP-3 在淡水中的潜在生态风险。