Huang Tzu-Hao, Cheng Wei, Wang Yeh-Han
Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 5;11(3):448. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030448.
Because immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for treating advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays have been widely used as companion or complementary diagnostic tests for predicting treatment outcomes. Because different clones, scoring algorithms, and cutoffs have been used for interpretation, this study investigated the variation, correlation, and concordance of four validated PD-L1 clones (SP142, SP263, 22C3, and 28-8) and proposed a practical solution for the harmonization of PD-L1 IHC. A tissue microarray, including 46 muscle-invasive UCs, was constructed for PD-L1 testing with the four clones. Tumor cell (TC) and immune cell (IC) expression was analyzed. SP142 had significantly low TC expression, whereas SP263, 22C3, and 28-8 exhibited a moderate correlation (rho ≥ 0.6), with almost perfect concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.8) in TC expression. Fair to moderate correlation and concordance were observed in IC expression in most pairwise comparisons of clones. Substantial concordance (kappa > 0.6) was noted when high PD-L1 expression was defined by applying clone-specific cutoffs to each clone. Our findings imply that a universal cutoff value is not feasible for UC; we propose that PD-L1 IHC assays for UC should be interpreted according to a clone-specific scoring algorithm and cutoff value.
由于免疫检查点抑制剂已被批准用于治疗晚期尿路上皮癌(UC),程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)免疫组化(IHC)检测已被广泛用作预测治疗结果的伴随或补充诊断测试。由于在解释时使用了不同的克隆、评分算法和临界值,本研究调查了四种经过验证的PD-L1克隆(SP142、SP263、22C3和28-8)的差异、相关性和一致性,并提出了一种统一PD-L1 IHC的实用解决方案。构建了一个包含46例肌层浸润性UC的组织芯片,用于用这四种克隆进行PD-L1检测。分析肿瘤细胞(TC)和免疫细胞(IC)的表达。SP142的TC表达显著较低,而SP263、22C3和28-8表现出中等相关性(rho≥0.6),在TC表达方面几乎完全一致(组内相关系数>0.8)。在大多数克隆的两两比较中,IC表达观察到中等至良好的相关性和一致性。当对每个克隆应用克隆特异性临界值来定义高PD-L1表达时,观察到显著的一致性(kappa>0.6)。我们的研究结果表明,对于UC来说,通用的临界值是不可行的;我们建议,UC的PD-L1 IHC检测应根据克隆特异性评分算法和临界值进行解释。