Koh Yoko, Kato Taigo, Yamamichi Gaku, Tomiyama Eisuke, Matsushita Makoto, Hatano Koji, Kawashima Atsunari, Nonomura Norio, Uemura Motohide
Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, 1, Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21253. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05697-4.
Therapeutic strategies for advanced renal cell carcinoma have advanced dramatically since the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors. To date, four PD-L1 assays have been established as companion diagnostic tools for checkpoint inhibitors. However, all PD-L1 assays present several limitations in terms of concordance and compatibility. In this study, we constructed tissue microarrays from 286 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tissue samples and evaluated PD-L1 expression using the 22C3, 28 - 8, SP142, and SP263 PD-L1 assays. Detection of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was very low for all PD-L1 assays tested, although expression of PD-L1 in immune cells in the tumor area was 14.7% for 22C3, 16.1% for 28 - 8, 2.1% for SP142, and 15.0% for SP263. PD-L1 expression on immune cells assessed by 28 - 8 showed a moderate pairwise concordance with other assays (κ statistics: 0.52 with 22C3, 0.16 with SP142, and 0.46 with SP263). Patients with PD-L1 expression in immune cells evaluated using 22C3, 28 - 8, and SP263 showed significantly worse cancer-specific survival. PD-L1 expression on renal cell carcinoma tissues assessed using 22C3, 28 - 8, SP142, and SP263 did not show good concordance. In conclusion, differences between these assays should be considered when evaluating the results of immunohistochemical findings.
自免疫检查点抑制剂获批以来,晚期肾细胞癌的治疗策略取得了显著进展。迄今为止,已有四种PD-L1检测方法被确立为检查点抑制剂的伴随诊断工具。然而,所有PD-L1检测方法在一致性和兼容性方面都存在一些局限性。在本研究中,我们用286份透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)组织样本构建了组织微阵列,并使用22C3、28-8、SP142和SP263这几种PD-L1检测方法评估了PD-L1的表达情况。在所检测的所有PD-L1检测方法中,肿瘤细胞中PD-L1表达的检测率都非常低,不过肿瘤区域免疫细胞中PD-L1的表达率在22C3检测中为14.7%,在28-8检测中为16.1%,在SP142检测中为2.1%,在SP263检测中为15.0%。通过28-8检测评估的免疫细胞上的PD-L1表达与其他检测方法显示出中等程度的成对一致性(κ统计值:与22C3为0.52,与SP142为0.16,与SP263为0.46)。使用22C3、28-8和SP263评估的免疫细胞中PD-L1表达的患者显示出明显更差的癌症特异性生存率。使用22C3、28-8、SP142和SP263评估的肾细胞癌组织上的PD-L1表达并未显示出良好的一致性。总之,在评估免疫组化结果时应考虑这些检测方法之间的差异。