Shende Shraddha A, Nguyen Lydia T, Lydon Elizabeth A, Husain Fatima T, Mudar Raksha A
Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Geriatrics (Basel). 2021 Mar 5;6(1):22. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics6010022.
Growing evidence suggests alterations in cognitive control processes in individuals with varying degrees of age-related hearing loss (ARHL); however, alterations in those with unaided mild ARHL are understudied. The current study examined two cognitive control processes, cognitive flexibility, and inhibition, in 21 older adults with unaided mild ARHL and 18 age- and education-matched normal hearing (NH) controls. All participants underwent comprehensive audiological and cognitive evaluations including Trail Making Test-B, Verbal Fluency, Stroop, and two Go/NoGo tasks. Group differences in cognitive flexibility and inhibition as well as associations between peripheral and central hearing ability and measures of cognitive flexibility and inhibition were investigated. Findings revealed that the ARHL group took significantly longer to complete the Stroop task and had higher error rates on NoGo trials on both Go/NoGo tasks relative to the NH controls. Additionally, poorer peripheral and central hearing were associated with poorer cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. Our findings suggest slower and more inefficient inhibitory control in the mild ARHL group relative to the NH group and add to decades of research on the association between hearing and cognition.
越来越多的证据表明,不同程度的年龄相关性听力损失(ARHL)个体的认知控制过程存在改变;然而,对未经辅助的轻度ARHL个体的改变研究不足。本研究在21名未经辅助的轻度ARHL老年人和18名年龄及教育程度匹配的听力正常(NH)对照者中,考察了两种认知控制过程,即认知灵活性和抑制能力。所有参与者都接受了全面的听力学和认知评估,包括连线测验B、言语流畅性、斯特鲁普测验以及两项Go/NoGo任务。研究了认知灵活性和抑制能力的组间差异,以及外周和中枢听力能力与认知灵活性和抑制能力测量指标之间的关联。研究结果显示,与NH对照组相比,ARHL组完成斯特鲁普任务的时间显著更长,并且在两项Go/NoGo任务的NoGo试验中错误率更高。此外,外周和中枢听力较差与认知灵活性和抑制控制较差相关。我们的研究结果表明,相对于NH组,轻度ARHL组的抑制控制更缓慢且效率更低,这也为听力与认知之间关联的数十年研究增添了内容。