• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性的纵向事件层面的性风险和物质使用。

Longitudinal Event-Level Sexual Risk and Substance Use among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men.

机构信息

British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada.

School of Psychology, University of Southhampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 19;18(6):3183. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063183.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18063183
PMID:33808675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8003364/
Abstract

(1) Background: Condomless anal sex and substance use are associated with STI risk among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM). Our first study objective was to describe event-level sexual risk and substance use trends among gbMSM. Our second study objective was to describe substances associated with event-level sexual risk. (2) Methods: Data come from the Momentum Health Study in Vancouver, British Columbia and participants were recruited from 2012-2015, with follow-up until 2018. Stratified by self-reported HIV status, we used generalized estimating equations to assess trends of sexual event-level substance use and assessed interactions between substance use and time period on event-level higher risk sex defined as condomless anal sex with an HIV serodifferent or unknown status partner. (3) Results: Event-level higher risk anal sex increased across the study period among HIV-negative/unknown (baseline prevalence: 13% vs. study end prevalence: 29%) and HIV-positive gbMSM (baseline prevalence: 16% vs. study end prevalence: 38%). Among HIV-negative/unknown gbMSM, event-level erectile drug use increased, while alcohol use decreased over the study period. Overall, interactions between substance use and time on higher risk anal sex were not statistically significant, regardless of serostatus. However, we found a number of time-specific significant interactions for erectile drugs, poppers, Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), crystal methamphetamine and ecstasy/MDMA use among HIV-negative/unknown gbMSM. (4) Conclusion: Significant differences in substance use trends and associated risks exist and are varied among gbMSM by serostatus. These findings provide a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of event-level substance use on sexual risk through longitudinal follow-up of nearly six years.

摘要

(1) 背景:无保护肛交和药物使用与男同性恋者、双性恋者和其他与男性发生性关系的男性(gbMSM)中的性传播感染(STI)风险相关。我们的第一个研究目标是描述 gbMSM 中的性行为风险和药物使用趋势。我们的第二个研究目标是描述与性行为风险相关的物质。(2) 方法:数据来自不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华的动力健康研究,参与者是在 2012-2015 年招募的,并随访至 2018 年。按自我报告的 HIV 状况分层,我们使用广义估计方程评估性行为风险的趋势和评估药物使用与时间之间的相互作用对性行为风险更高的定义为与 HIV 血清学不同或未知状态的伴侣进行无保护的肛交。(3) 结果:在研究期间,HIV 阴性/未知(基线患病率:13%与研究结束时的患病率:29%)和 HIV 阳性 gbMSM(基线患病率:16%与研究结束时的患病率:38%)中,性行为风险更高的肛交事件增加。在 HIV 阴性/未知的 gbMSM 中,药物使用增加,而在研究期间,酒精使用减少。总体而言,无论血清学状况如何,药物使用与时间之间的相互作用对性行为风险没有统计学意义。然而,我们发现了一些与 HIV 阴性/未知的 gbMSM 中的勃起药物、啪啪剂、γ-羟基丁酸(GHB)、冰毒和摇头丸/ MDMA 使用相关的时间特异性显著相互作用。(4) 结论:在不同的血清学状态下,gbMSM 中存在不同的药物使用趋势和相关风险。这些发现通过近六年的纵向随访,提供了对事件层面的药物使用对性行为风险的影响的更全面的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd6d/8003364/1a0f0d59af79/ijerph-18-03183-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd6d/8003364/0c2734f695cc/ijerph-18-03183-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd6d/8003364/1a0f0d59af79/ijerph-18-03183-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd6d/8003364/0c2734f695cc/ijerph-18-03183-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd6d/8003364/1a0f0d59af79/ijerph-18-03183-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Longitudinal Event-Level Sexual Risk and Substance Use among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men.男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性的纵向事件层面的性风险和物质使用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 19;18(6):3183. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063183.
2
Variations in Sexual Behaviors by Use of Specific Substances Among Vancouver Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men: An Event-Level Analysis.特定物质使用与温哥华男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者性行为变化的关联:基于事件水平的分析。
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Oct;50(7):2875-2886. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02068-8. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
3
Undetectable or Unknown? A Longitudinal Event-Level Analysis of Disclosure of HIV Serostatus and Undetectability Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who have Sex with Men (gbMSM) in Metro Vancouver.无法检测或未知?温哥华都会区男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(gbMSM)HIV 血清学状态和无法检测的纵向事件水平分析。
AIDS Behav. 2021 Aug;25(8):2630-2643. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03224-w. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
4
Patterns of Event-Level Concurrent Substance Use During Sex Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men in Metro Vancouver.在温哥华都会区,男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性在性行为中同时使用物质的事件水平的模式。
AIDS Behav. 2023 Sep;27(9):3157-3170. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04036-w. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
5
Event-Level Analysis of Anal Sex Roles and Sex Drug Use Among Gay and Bisexual Men in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华市男同性恋者和双性恋男性肛交角色与性药使用的事件层面分析
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Aug;45(6):1443-51. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0607-0. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
6
Does age matter? Sexual event-level analysis of age-disparate sexual partners among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBM) in Vancouver, Canada.年龄重要吗?对加拿大温哥华男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性关系的男性(GBM)中年龄不同的性伴侣进行性事件层面的分析。
Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Aug;93(5):332-341. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052721. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
7
Sexual behavior and drug use impact in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.性行为和吸毒对男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性关系的男性的影响。
Med Clin (Barc). 2022 Dec 23;159(12):563-568. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2022.02.023. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
8
Substance use, sexual behaviour and prevention strategies of Vancouver gay and bisexual men who recently attended group sex events.近期参加过群交活动的温哥华男同性恋者和双性恋者的物质使用、性行为及预防策略。
Cult Health Sex. 2016;18(4):361-76. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2015.1084649. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
9
Crystal Methamphetamine Use and Initiation among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men Living with HIV in a Treatment as Prevention Environment.在治疗即预防环境中,感染 HIV 的男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性中,冰毒使用和初次使用情况。
Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(14):2428-2437. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1833925. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
10
Substance Use Patterns of Gay and Bisexual Men in the Momentum Health Study.“动力健康研究”中男同性恋者和双性恋男性的物质使用模式
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Sep;12(5):1759-1773. doi: 10.1177/1557988318786872. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating drug use, cessation, and recovery: a retrospective case notes review among sexual minority men at a community-based service in Singapore.探索药物使用、戒除和康复:新加坡社区服务机构中男同性恋者的回顾性病历审查。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2024 Apr 16;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13011-024-00605-x.
2
Impact of screening and doxycycline prevention on the syphilis epidemic among men who have sex with men in British Columbia: a mathematical modelling study.筛查和多西环素预防对不列颠哥伦比亚省男男性行为者梅毒流行的影响:一项数学建模研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 4;33:100725. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100725. eCollection 2024 May.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Generational differences in sexual behaviour and partnering among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性行为的男性在性行为和伴侣关系方面的代际差异。
Can J Hum Sex. 2019 Aug;28(2):215-225. doi: 10.3138/cjhs.2019-0014. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
2
Psychological and Interpersonal Factors Associated with Sexualized Drug Use Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.与男男性行为者性化药物使用相关的心理和人际因素:混合方法系统综述。
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Feb;50(2):427-460. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01741-8. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
3
HIV in Canada-Surveillance Report, 2018.
Patterns of Event-Level Concurrent Substance Use During Sex Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men in Metro Vancouver.
在温哥华都会区,男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性在性行为中同时使用物质的事件水平的模式。
AIDS Behav. 2023 Sep;27(9):3157-3170. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04036-w. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
4
Sexualized drug use among men who have sex with men in Madrid and Barcelona: The gateway to new drug use?马德里和巴塞罗那男男性行为者中的性化药物使用:新药物使用的门户?
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 15;10:997730. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.997730. eCollection 2022.
《2018年加拿大艾滋病病毒监测报告》
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2019 Dec 5;45(12):304-312. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v45i12a01.
4
Substance Use, HIV Serostatus Disclosure, and Sexual Risk Behavior in People Living with HIV: An Event-Level Analysis.物质使用、艾滋病毒血清学检测结果披露与艾滋病毒感染者的性行为风险:基于事件水平的分析。
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Aug;49(6):2005-2018. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01531-x. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
5
Harmless? A hierarchical analysis of poppers use correlates among young gay and bisexual men.无害?对年轻男同性恋和双性恋者使用啪啪剂相关因素的层次分析。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019 Jul;38(5):465-472. doi: 10.1111/dar.12958. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
6
Agreement between gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men's period prevalence and event-level recall of sexual behaviour: an observational respondent-driven sampling study.男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性行为的男性在性传播感染期间患病率与性行为事件层面回忆之间的一致性:一项观察性应答者驱动抽样研究
Sex Health. 2019 Feb;16(1):84-87. doi: 10.1071/SH17223.
7
National Trends in Sexual Behavior, Substance Use and HIV Testing Among United States Men Who have Sex with Men Recruited Online, 2013 Through 2017.2013 年至 2017 年美国在线招募的男男性行为者性行为、物质使用和 HIV 检测的全国趋势。
AIDS Behav. 2018 Aug;22(8):2413-2425. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2168-4.
8
Assessing the longitudinal stability of latent classes of substance use among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.评估男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性中物质使用潜在类别纵向稳定性。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Jul 1;188:348-355. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.04.019. Epub 2018 May 22.
9
HIV Risk and Protective Factors in the Context of Alcohol and Substance Use During Pride.在骄傲月期间,与酒精和物质使用有关的艾滋病毒风险和保护因素。
AIDS Behav. 2018 Sep;22(9):2797-2806. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2117-2.
10
Sexualized Drug Use (Chemsex) Is Associated with High-Risk Sexual Behaviors and Sexually Transmitted Infections in HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex with Men: Data from the U-SEX GESIDA 9416 Study.性化药物使用(Chemsex)与 HIV 阳性男男性行为者中的高风险性行为和性传播感染相关:来自 U-SEX GESIDA 9416 研究的数据。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018 Mar;32(3):112-118. doi: 10.1089/apc.2017.0263.