• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较慢性缺血性心肌病小鼠模型中单次和多次给予 C-kit 阳性心脏细胞的效果。

Comparison of Repeated Doses of C-kit-Positive Cardiac Cells versus a Single Equivalent Combined Dose in a Murine Model of Chronic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Institute of Molecular Cardiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 19;22(6):3145. doi: 10.3390/ijms22063145.

DOI:10.3390/ijms22063145
PMID:33808720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8003463/
Abstract

Using a murine model of chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy caused by an old myocardial infarction (MI), we have previously found that three doses of 1 × 10 c-kit positive cardiac cells (CPCs) are more effective than a single dose of 1 × 10 cells. The goal of this study was to determine whether the beneficial effects of three doses of CPCs (1 × 10 cells each) can be fully replicated by a single combined dose of 3 × 10 CPCs. Mice underwent a 60-min coronary occlusion; after 90 days of reperfusion, they received three echo-guided intraventricular infusions at 5-week intervals: (1) vehicle × 3; (2) one combined dose of CPCs (3 × 10) and vehicle × 2; or (3) three doses of CPCs (1 × 10 each). In the combined-dose group, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved after the 1st CPC infusion, but not after the 2nd and 3rd (vehicle) infusions. In contrast, in the multiple-dose group, LVEF increased after each CPC infusion; at the final echo, LVEF averaged 35.2 ± 0.6% ( < 0.001 vs. the vehicle group, 27.3 ± 0.2%). At the end of the study, the total cumulative change in EF from pretreatment values was numerically greater in the multiple-dose group (6.6 ± 0.6%) than in the combined-dose group (4.8 ± 0.8%), although the difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.08). Hemodynamic studies showed that several parameters of LV function in the multiple-dose group were numerically greater than in the combined-dose group ( = 0.08 for the difference in LVEF). Compared with vehicle, cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area was reduced only in the multiple-dose group (-32.7%, 182.6 ± 15.1 µm vs. 271.5 ± 27.2 µm, < 0.05, in the risk region and -28.5%, 148.5 ± 12.1 µm vs. 207.6 ± 20.5 µm, < 0.05, in the noninfarcted region). LV weight/body weight ratio and LV weight/tibia length ratios were significantly reduced in both cell treated groups vs. the vehicle group, indicating the attenuation of LV hypertrophy; however, the lung weight/body weight ratio was significantly reduced only in the multiple-dose group, suggesting decreased pulmonary congestion. Taken together, these results indicate that in mice with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy, the beneficial effects of three doses of CPCs on LV function and hypertrophy cannot be fully replicated with a single dose, notwithstanding the fact that the total number of cells delivered with one or three doses is the same. Thus, it is the multiplicity of doses, and not the total number of cells, that accounts for the superiority of the repeated-dose paradigm. This study supports the idea that the efficacy of cell therapy in heart failure can be augmented by repeated administrations.

摘要

利用陈旧性心肌梗死导致的慢性缺血性心肌病的小鼠模型,我们之前发现,3 次给予 1×10 的 c-kit 阳性心肌细胞(CPC)比单次给予 1×10 的细胞更有效。本研究的目的是确定 3 次给予 CPC(每次 1×10 个细胞)的有益作用是否可以通过单次给予 3×10 的 CPC 完全复制。小鼠接受 60 分钟的冠状动脉闭塞;再灌注 90 天后,它们接受 3 次间隔 5 周的超声引导心室内输注:(1)载体×3;(2)一个 CPC 联合剂量(3×10)和载体×2;或(3)3 次 CPC 剂量(每次 1×10)。在联合剂量组中,左心室射血分数(LVEF)在第一次 CPC 输注后改善,但在第二次和第三次(载体)输注后没有改善。相比之下,在多次剂量组中,每次 CPC 输注后 LVEF 均增加;在最后的超声心动图中,LVEF 平均为 35.2±0.6%(<0.001 与载体组相比,27.3±0.2%)。在研究结束时,从预处理值开始,多次剂量组的 EF 总累积变化数值大于联合剂量组(6.6±0.6%比 4.8±0.8%),尽管差异无统计学意义(=0.08)。血流动力学研究表明,多次剂量组的几个 LV 功能参数数值大于联合剂量组(=0.08 表示 LVEF 的差异)。与载体相比,仅在多次剂量组中,心肌细胞横截面积减少(-32.7%,182.6±15.1 µm 与 271.5±27.2 µm,<0.05,在风险区域和-28.5%,148.5±12.1 µm 与 207.6±20.5 µm,<0.05,在非梗死区域)。在接受细胞治疗的两组中,LV 重量/体重比和 LV 重量/胫骨长度比均显著降低,表明 LV 肥大得到抑制;然而,仅在多次剂量组中,肺重量/体重比显著降低,提示肺充血减少。综上所述,这些结果表明,在患有慢性缺血性心肌病的小鼠中,单次给予 1 次剂量的 CPC 对 LV 功能和肥大的有益作用不能完全复制,尽管单次或 3 次给予的细胞总数相同。因此,是剂量的多次性,而不是细胞总数,决定了重复剂量方案的优越性。这项研究支持这样一种观点,即心力衰竭细胞治疗的疗效可以通过重复给药来增强。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/8bb7bb3f270b/ijms-22-03145-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/d8360bad97b0/ijms-22-03145-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/79924c8501bd/ijms-22-03145-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/f8105cbb1e12/ijms-22-03145-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/d484d84c874b/ijms-22-03145-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/f5d28f35da87/ijms-22-03145-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/191993501cab/ijms-22-03145-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/f4aff2ebf710/ijms-22-03145-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/8bb7bb3f270b/ijms-22-03145-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/d8360bad97b0/ijms-22-03145-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/79924c8501bd/ijms-22-03145-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/f8105cbb1e12/ijms-22-03145-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/d484d84c874b/ijms-22-03145-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/f5d28f35da87/ijms-22-03145-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/191993501cab/ijms-22-03145-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/f4aff2ebf710/ijms-22-03145-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b30/8003463/8bb7bb3f270b/ijms-22-03145-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Repeated Doses of C-kit-Positive Cardiac Cells versus a Single Equivalent Combined Dose in a Murine Model of Chronic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.比较慢性缺血性心肌病小鼠模型中单次和多次给予 C-kit 阳性心脏细胞的效果。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 19;22(6):3145. doi: 10.3390/ijms22063145.
2
Comparison of One and Three Intraventricular Injections of Cardiac Progenitor Cells in a Murine Model of Chronic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.比较在慢性缺血性心肌病的小鼠模型中单次和三次脑室注射心脏祖细胞的效果。
Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2021 Apr;17(2):604-615. doi: 10.1007/s12015-020-10063-0. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
3
Repeated Administrations of Cardiac Progenitor Cells Are Superior to a Single Administration of an Equivalent Cumulative Dose.重复给予心脏祖细胞优于单次给予等效累积剂量。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 13;7(4):e007400. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007400.
4
Repeated doses of cardiac mesenchymal cells are therapeutically superior to a single dose in mice with old myocardial infarction.在患有陈旧性心肌梗死的小鼠中,重复剂量的心脏间充质细胞在治疗上优于单次剂量。
Basic Res Cardiol. 2017 Mar;112(2):18. doi: 10.1007/s00395-017-0606-5. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
5
Repeated Administrations of Cardiac Progenitor Cells Are Markedly More Effective Than a Single Administration: A New Paradigm in Cell Therapy.重复给予心脏祖细胞比单次给予明显更有效:细胞治疗的新范例。
Circ Res. 2016 Aug 19;119(5):635-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308937. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
6
Effects of Intracoronary Infusion of Escalating Doses of Cardiac Stem Cells in Rats With Acute Myocardial Infarction.冠状动脉内输注递增剂量心脏干细胞对急性心肌梗死大鼠的影响。
Circ Heart Fail. 2015 Jul;8(4):757-65. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002210. Epub 2015 May 20.
7
Long-Term Outcome of Administration of c-kit(POS) Cardiac Progenitor Cells After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Transplanted Cells Do not Become Cardiomyocytes, but Structural and Functional Improvement and Proliferation of Endogenous Cells Persist for at Least One Year.急性心肌梗死后给予c-kit(阳性)心脏祖细胞的长期结果:移植细胞不会变成心肌细胞,但内源性细胞的结构和功能改善以及增殖至少持续一年。
Circ Res. 2016 Apr 1;118(7):1091-105. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307647. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
8
Intracoronary delivery of autologous cardiac stem cells improves cardiac function in a porcine model of chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy.自体心脏干细胞冠状动脉内递送改善慢性缺血性心肌病猪模型的心脏功能。
Circulation. 2013 Jul 9;128(2):122-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001075. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
9
Transplantation of Epigenetically Modified Adult Cardiac c-Kit+ Cells Retards Remodeling and Improves Cardiac Function in Ischemic Heart Failure Model.表观遗传修饰的成年心脏c-Kit+细胞移植延缓缺血性心力衰竭模型中的心脏重塑并改善心脏功能
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2015 Sep;4(9):1086-96. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2014-0290. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
10
Apoptosis-Resistant Cardiac Progenitor Cells Modified With Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease/Redox Factor 1 Gene Overexpression Regulate Cardiac Repair After Myocardial Infarction.通过过表达脱嘌呤/脱嘧啶内切酶/氧化还原因子1基因修饰的抗凋亡心脏祖细胞调节心肌梗死后的心脏修复。
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016 Aug;5(8):1067-78. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0281. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Intravenous infusions of mesenchymal stromal cells have cumulative beneficial effects in a porcine model of chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy.在慢性缺血性心肌病猪模型中,静脉输注间充质基质细胞具有累积有益效应。
Cardiovasc Res. 2024 Dec 4;120(15):1939-1952. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvae173.
2
PU.1 inhibition does not attenuate cardiac function deterioration or fibrosis in a murine model of myocardial infarction.PU.1 抑制并不能减轻心肌梗死后小鼠心脏功能恶化或纤维化。
Mol Cell Biochem. 2023 Apr;478(4):927-937. doi: 10.1007/s11010-022-04561-7. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
3
Effects of Heme Oxygenase-1 on c-Kit-Positive Cardiac Cells.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of One and Three Intraventricular Injections of Cardiac Progenitor Cells in a Murine Model of Chronic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.比较在慢性缺血性心肌病的小鼠模型中单次和三次脑室注射心脏祖细胞的效果。
Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2021 Apr;17(2):604-615. doi: 10.1007/s12015-020-10063-0. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
Time to end the war on cell therapy.是时候结束细胞疗法之战了。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 May;22(5):893-897. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1767. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
3
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.
血红素加氧酶-1 对 c-Kit 阳性心脏细胞的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Dec 15;22(24):13448. doi: 10.3390/ijms222413448.
《2019年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
4
New Paradigms in Cell Therapy: Repeated Dosing, Intravenous Delivery, Immunomodulatory Actions, and New Cell Types.细胞治疗的新范式:重复给药、静脉给药、免疫调节作用和新型细胞类型。
Circ Res. 2018 Jul 6;123(2):138-158. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313251.
5
Repeated Administrations of Cardiac Progenitor Cells Are Superior to a Single Administration of an Equivalent Cumulative Dose.重复给予心脏祖细胞优于单次给予等效累积剂量。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 13;7(4):e007400. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007400.
6
Myocardial Reparative Properties of Cardiac Mesenchymal Cells Isolated on the Basis of Adherence.基于贴壁法分离的心脏间充质细胞的心肌修复特性
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 11;69(14):1824-1838. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.048.
7
Stem cells: Cell therapy for cardiac repair: what is needed to move forward?干细胞:用于心脏修复的细胞疗法:向前发展需要什么?
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 May;14(5):257-258. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.38. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
8
Repeated doses of cardiac mesenchymal cells are therapeutically superior to a single dose in mice with old myocardial infarction.在患有陈旧性心肌梗死的小鼠中,重复剂量的心脏间充质细胞在治疗上优于单次剂量。
Basic Res Cardiol. 2017 Mar;112(2):18. doi: 10.1007/s00395-017-0606-5. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
Repeated Cell Therapy: A Paradigm Shift Whose Time Has Come.重复细胞治疗:时机已到的范式转变。
Circ Res. 2017 Mar 31;120(7):1072-1074. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.310710. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
10
Repeated Administrations of Cardiac Progenitor Cells Are Markedly More Effective Than a Single Administration: A New Paradigm in Cell Therapy.重复给予心脏祖细胞比单次给予明显更有效:细胞治疗的新范例。
Circ Res. 2016 Aug 19;119(5):635-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308937. Epub 2016 Jun 30.