• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估激光雷达在杂草检测中的能力和潜力。

Assessing the Capability and Potential of LiDAR for Weed Detection.

机构信息

UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Stirling Highway, WA 6009, Australia.

Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Stirling Highway, WA 6009, Australia.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 26;21(7):2328. doi: 10.3390/s21072328.

DOI:10.3390/s21072328
PMID:33810604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8038051/
Abstract

Conventional methods of uniformly spraying fields to combat weeds, requires large herbicide inputs at significant cost with impacts on the environment. More focused weed control methods such as site-specific weed management (SSWM) have become popular but require methods to identify weed locations. Advances in technology allows the potential for automated methods such as drone, but also ground-based sensors for detecting and mapping weeds. In this study, the capability of Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensors were assessed to detect and locate weeds. For this purpose, two trials were performed using artificial targets (representing weeds) at different heights and diameter to understand the detection limits of a LiDAR. The results showed the detectability of the target at different scanning distances from the LiDAR was directly influenced by the size of the target and its orientation toward the LiDAR. A third trial was performed in a wheat plot where the LiDAR was used to scan different weed species at various heights above the crop canopy, to verify the capacity of the stationary LiDAR to detect weeds in a field situation. The results showed that 100% of weeds in the wheat plot were detected by the LiDAR, based on their height differences with the crop canopy.

摘要

传统的大田均匀喷洒除草方法需要大量的除草剂投入,成本高昂,对环境也有影响。因此,一些更为集中的杂草控制方法,如精准杂草管理(SSWM),变得越来越受欢迎,但这些方法需要识别杂草位置的方法。技术的进步为自动化方法(如无人机)提供了可能性,但也需要地面传感器来检测和绘制杂草地图。在本研究中,评估了激光雷达(LiDAR)传感器检测和定位杂草的能力。为此,进行了两次试验,使用不同高度和直径的人工目标(代表杂草)来了解 LiDAR 的检测极限。结果表明,LiDAR 不同扫描距离处目标的可检测性直接受到目标大小及其相对于 LiDAR 的方向的影响。第三次试验是在麦田中进行的,LiDAR 用于扫描作物冠层上方不同高度的不同杂草物种,以验证固定 LiDAR 在田间情况下检测杂草的能力。结果表明,基于与作物冠层的高度差异,LiDAR 检测到麦田中 100%的杂草。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/7f0ed197f583/sensors-21-02328-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/7850fad5ec8b/sensors-21-02328-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/bfaf6becbcaf/sensors-21-02328-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/2d04dc9ff081/sensors-21-02328-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/6b9d3e1ca5fa/sensors-21-02328-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/3e814a3b218e/sensors-21-02328-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/b5eb7212fa82/sensors-21-02328-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/7f0ed197f583/sensors-21-02328-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/7850fad5ec8b/sensors-21-02328-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/bfaf6becbcaf/sensors-21-02328-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/2d04dc9ff081/sensors-21-02328-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/6b9d3e1ca5fa/sensors-21-02328-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/3e814a3b218e/sensors-21-02328-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/b5eb7212fa82/sensors-21-02328-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81b7/8038051/7f0ed197f583/sensors-21-02328-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the Capability and Potential of LiDAR for Weed Detection.评估激光雷达在杂草检测中的能力和潜力。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 26;21(7):2328. doi: 10.3390/s21072328.
2
Discriminating crop, weeds and soil surface with a terrestrial LIDAR sensor.利用地面激光雷达传感器区分作物、杂草和土壤表面。
Sensors (Basel). 2013 Oct 29;13(11):14662-75. doi: 10.3390/s131114662.
3
An ultrasonic system for weed detection in cereal crops.一种用于检测谷物作物中杂草的超声波系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2012 Dec 13;12(12):17343-57. doi: 10.3390/s121217343.
4
A LiDAR Sensor-Based Spray Boom Height Detection Method and the Corresponding Experimental Validation.基于激光雷达传感器的喷雾机高度检测方法及其实验验证。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 17;21(6):2107. doi: 10.3390/s21062107.
5
Harnessing UAVs and deep learning for accurate grass weed detection in wheat fields: a study on biomass and yield implications.利用无人机和深度学习进行麦田杂草精准检测:对生物量和产量影响的研究
Plant Methods. 2024 Sep 19;20(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13007-024-01272-6.
6
Pre-planting weed detection based on ground field spectral data.基于地面田间光谱数据的播种前杂草检测。
Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Mar;76(3):1173-1182. doi: 10.1002/ps.5630. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
7
Towards practical object detection for weed spraying in precision agriculture.面向精准农业中杂草喷洒的实用目标检测
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Nov 3;14:1183277. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1183277. eCollection 2023.
8
The effects of sampling and instrument orientation on LiDAR data from crop plots.采样和仪器方向对作物地块激光雷达数据的影响。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Mar 14;14:1087239. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1087239. eCollection 2023.
9
Weed detection and recognition in complex wheat fields based on an improved YOLOv7.基于改进YOLOv7的复杂麦田杂草检测与识别
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jun 24;15:1372237. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1372237. eCollection 2024.
10
On-Ground Vineyard Reconstruction Using a LiDAR-Based Automated System.基于激光雷达的自动化系统进行地面葡萄园重建。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 18;20(4):1102. doi: 10.3390/s20041102.

引用本文的文献

1
Design and performance evaluation of a spiral bar precision weeding mechanism for corn fields.玉米田螺旋杆式精密除草机构的设计与性能评价
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 15;14(1):28186. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76311-2.
2
Sensing and Perception in Robotic Weeding: Innovations and Limitations for Digital Agriculture.机器人除草中的传感与感知:数字农业的创新与局限
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 20;24(20):6743. doi: 10.3390/s24206743.

本文引用的文献

1
On-Ground Vineyard Reconstruction Using a LiDAR-Based Automated System.基于激光雷达的自动化系统进行地面葡萄园重建。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 18;20(4):1102. doi: 10.3390/s20041102.
2
Herbicide Resistance Management: Recent Developments and Trends.除草剂抗性管理:最新进展与趋势
Plants (Basel). 2019 Jun 8;8(6):161. doi: 10.3390/plants8060161.
3
Perspectives for Remote Sensing with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Precision Agriculture.在精准农业中使用无人机进行遥感的展望。
Trends Plant Sci. 2019 Feb;24(2):152-164. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
4
Weed mapping in cotton using ground-based sensors and GIS.利用地面传感器和 GIS 进行棉花杂草制图。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Sep 30;190(10):622. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6991-x.
5
High Throughput Determination of Plant Height, Ground Cover, and Above-Ground Biomass in Wheat with LiDAR.利用激光雷达高通量测定小麦株高、地面覆盖度和地上生物量
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Feb 27;9:237. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00237. eCollection 2018.
6
Terrestrial 3D laser scanning to track the increase in canopy height of both monocot and dicot crop species under field conditions.地面三维激光扫描技术用于跟踪田间条件下单子叶和双子叶作物冠层高度的增加情况。
Plant Methods. 2016 Jan 29;12:9. doi: 10.1186/s13007-016-0109-7. eCollection 2016.
7
A Review of LIDAR Radiometric Processing: From Ad Hoc Intensity Correction to Rigorous Radiometric Calibration.激光雷达辐射处理综述:从临时强度校正到严格的辐射校准
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Nov 6;15(11):28099-128. doi: 10.3390/s151128099.
8
Discriminating crop, weeds and soil surface with a terrestrial LIDAR sensor.利用地面激光雷达传感器区分作物、杂草和土壤表面。
Sensors (Basel). 2013 Oct 29;13(11):14662-75. doi: 10.3390/s131114662.
9
The properties of terrestrial laser system intensity for measuring leaf geometries: a case study with Conference Pear trees (Pyrus communis).地面激光系统强度测量叶片几何形状的特性:以西洋梨(Pyrus communis)为例的研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2011;11(2):1657-81. doi: 10.3390/s110201657. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
10
Accuracy and feasibility of optoelectronic sensors for weed mapping in wide row crops.用于宽行作物杂草制图的光电传感器的准确性和可行性。
Sensors (Basel). 2011;11(3):2304-18. doi: 10.3390/s110302304. Epub 2011 Feb 24.