Suppr超能文献

与反肩关节置换术中的外侧化肱骨设计相比, Grammont 假体可早期恢复肩部功能。

Early restoration of shoulder function in patients with the Grammont prosthesis compared to lateralized humeral design in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Nov;30(11):2533-2542. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.03.145. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters of patients after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) between the Grammont prosthesis and lateralized humeral design prosthesis.

METHODS

A total of 114 patients who underwent RSA with a lateralized humeral design (group L; 71 shoulders) and medialized humeral design (group M; 43 shoulders) prosthesis for cuff tear arthropathy or irreparable rotator cuff tear were enrolled. Clinical outcomes including visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and Constant scores and range of motion (ROM) were serially followed up at postoperative 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Radiographic parameters were measured to evaluate preoperative and postoperative status.

RESULTS

Both prostheses demonstrated similar clinical outcomes and shoulder function preoperatively and at postoperative 2 years (P >.05). However, patients in group M had significantly better postoperative active forward flexion (postoperative 3 months, 115° ± 12° vs. 101° ± 14°; P <.001; 6 months, 125° ± 13° vs. 118° ± 13°; P <.013) and abduction (3 months, 105° ± 12° vs. 98° ± 12°; P = .002); VAS (3 months, 3.1 ± 1.2 vs. 3.7 ± 1.4; P = .031; 6 months, 2.3 ± 1.1 vs. 2.8 ± 1.3; P = .038); ASES (3 months, 64.2 ± 7.0 vs. 60.4 ± 9.2; P = .022; 6 months, 70.6 ± 6.0 vs. 66.6 ± 8.1; P = .007); and Constant scores (6 months, 59.6 ± 6.9 vs. 55.7 ± 9.3; P = .020). Group L showed a significantly lower rate of scapular notching than group M (15.5% vs. 41.8%; P < .001). The position of the proximal humerus in group L was more lateralized and less distalized than in group M after RSA.

CONCLUSIONS

RSA with both the Grammont and lateralized humeral design prostheses provided similar shoulder ROM restoration and functional improvements at a minimum of 2 years. However, patients with a humeral lateralized prosthesis showed slower recovery of shoulder function and ROM up to postoperative 6 months despite a lower incidence of scapular notching.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较反向肩关节置换术(RSA)后 Grammont 假体和偏置肱骨设计假体患者的临床结果和影像学参数。

方法

共纳入 114 例因肩袖撕裂性关节炎或不可修复肩袖撕裂而行 RSA 的患者,其中 71 例采用偏置肱骨设计假体(L 组),43 例采用内侧化肱骨设计假体(M 组)。分别在术后 3、6、12 和 24 个月时对视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国肩肘外科医生协会(ASES)标准肩部评估表和Constant 评分以及活动范围(ROM)进行连续随访。测量影像学参数以评估术前和术后情况。

结果

两种假体在术前和术后 2 年均表现出相似的临床结果和肩部功能(P>.05)。然而,M 组患者术后主动前屈(术后 3 个月,115°±12°比 101°±14°;P<.001;6 个月,125°±13°比 118°±13°;P<.013)和外展(3 个月,105°±12°比 98°±12°;P=.002)、VAS(3 个月,3.1±1.2 比 3.7±1.4;P=.031;6 个月,2.3±1.1 比 2.8±1.3;P=.038)、ASES(3 个月,64.2±7.0 比 60.4±9.2;P=.022;6 个月,70.6±6.0 比 66.6±8.1;P=.007)和 Constant 评分(6 个月,59.6±6.9 比 55.7±9.3;P=.020)均明显更好。L 组的肩胛切迹发生率明显低于 M 组(15.5%比 41.8%;P<.001)。RSA 后,L 组肱骨近端位置比 M 组更偏置,更靠近外侧。

结论

至少 2 年的随访发现,Grammont 假体和偏置肱骨设计假体的 RSA 都能提供相似的肩关节 ROM 恢复和功能改善。然而,尽管肩胛切迹发生率较低,采用偏置肱骨假体的患者在术后 6 个月内肩部功能和 ROM 的恢复速度较慢。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验