Department of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Education, Psychology and Sports Science, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
Department of Social, Evolutionary and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Education, Psychology and Sports Science, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
J Relig Health. 2021 Aug;60(4):2830-2848. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01247-0. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
The present study evaluates the influence of spirituality/religiosity (S/R) on the coping strategies used by people with cancer (breast and prostate) compared with those without cancer, in a sample of 445 Spanish participants (160 with cancer and 285 without). Significant interactions between the presence of cancer and S/R are observed in the use of coping strategies such as religion, humor and disconnection. Spirituality as a predictor variable through the use of religion as a strategy, increased the explanatory capacity of age by 58.9% (β = .794) while praying/talking to God predicts the use of this strategy with a β = .383. In people with cancer, active coping was predicted by spirituality (β = .327). However, spirituality was a negative predictor of maladaptive coping, with a beta coefficient equal to .383. The data suggest that patients' beliefs need to be considered by health care professionals when designing interventions.
本研究评估了灵性/宗教信仰(S/R)对患有癌症(乳腺癌和前列腺癌)的人与没有癌症的人所使用的应对策略的影响,该研究样本包括 445 名西班牙参与者(160 名癌症患者和 285 名非癌症患者)。在使用应对策略(如宗教、幽默和脱节)方面,观察到癌症的存在与 S/R 之间存在显著的相互作用。作为预测变量的灵性,通过将宗教作为一种策略,将年龄的解释能力提高了 58.9%(β=0.794),而祈祷/与上帝交谈则预测了这种策略的使用,β=0.383。在癌症患者中,积极的应对方式受灵性(β=0.327)的影响。然而,灵性是适应不良应对的负预测因子,β系数等于 0.383。这些数据表明,在设计干预措施时,医疗保健专业人员需要考虑患者的信仰。