Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Neurophysiol Clin. 2021 Aug;51(4):339-347. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on pain and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia.
Thirty participants were randomized into two groups of 15 patients, to receive 3 sessions of either high-frequency (10 Hz) rTMS or 2 mA, 20 min anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) over 1 week. Pain was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before treatment, immediately after treatment, 6 and 12 weeks later. Quality of life was evaluated using the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) and psychiatric symptoms were measured using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 Item (DASS-21) before treatment, and 6 and 12 weeks after treatment.
For the VAS there was a significant time-group interaction, showing that the behavior of two groups differed regarding changes of VAS in favor of the RTMS group (df = 1.73, F = 4.80, p = <0.016). Time-group interaction effect on DASS-21 and FIQR was not significant. 66.6% of patients in rTMS group and 26.6% of patients in tDCS group experienced at least a 30% reduction of VAS from baseline to last follow-up (p = 0.028).
With the methodology used in this study, both rTMS and tDCS were safe modalities and three sessions of rTMS over DLPFC had greater and longer lasting analgesic effects compared to tDCS in patients with FM. However, considering the limitations of this study, further studies are needed to explore the most effective modality.
本研究旨在比较重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对纤维肌痛患者疼痛和生活质量的影响。
30 名参与者随机分为两组,每组 15 名患者,分别接受 3 次高频(10Hz)rTMS 或 2mA、20 分钟阳极 tDCS,刺激部位为左侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC),为期 1 周。治疗前、治疗后即刻、6 周和 12 周时使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛。使用修订版纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQR)评估生活质量,使用抑郁焦虑压力量表-21 项(DASS-21)评估治疗前和治疗后 6 周和 12 周的精神症状。
对于 VAS,存在显著的时间-组交互作用,表明两组在 VAS 变化方面的行为不同,rTMS 组更有利于 VAS 的改善(df=1.73,F=4.80,p=0.016)。时间-组交互作用对 DASS-21 和 FIQR 无显著影响。rTMS 组 66.6%的患者和 tDCS 组 26.6%的患者在 VAS 从基线到最后随访时至少减少了 30%(p=0.028)。
在本研究中使用的方法学中,rTMS 和 tDCS 均为安全的治疗方法,与 tDCS 相比,rTMS 刺激 DLPFC 三次可在纤维肌痛患者中产生更强且持续时间更长的镇痛效果。然而,考虑到本研究的局限性,需要进一步研究以探索最有效的治疗方法。