• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉左心室静脉导线移除和再植入的技术特点和临床结果。

Technical Features and Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Venous Left Ventricular Lead Removal and Reimplantation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University.

Clinical Research Division for Heart Rhythm Management, Tokyo Women's Medical University.

出版信息

Circ J. 2021 Jul 21;85(8):1349-1355. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-1199. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-20-1199
PMID:33814523
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The number of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy has increased. Consequently, there is increased frequency in the removal and reimplantation of coronary venous (CV) leads due to infection or malfunction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 345 consecutive patients referred for lead(s) extraction were reviewed. Of these, 34 patients who underwent a CV lead removal were investigated. The indications for CV leads removal were device-related infections in 29 patients and lead malfunctions in 5 patients. The average duration of the CV leads was 4.1±3.8 years. All CV leads were successfully removed without any major complications, except for 1 in-hospital death. Successful CV lead removal by simple traction (ST) was achieved in 21 patients (62%), whereas extraction tools were required in 13 patients (38%). Local infection and CV lead dwell time were significantly associated with successful ST (P=0.04 and P=0.014, respectively). CV lead re-implantation was successfully performed in 25 patients; however, a right-side approach was required in 92%, and occlusion/stenosis of the previous CV was observed in 80% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CV lead removal is relatively successful and safe. The presence of local infection and a shorter lead duration may enable successful ST of a CV lead. However, the re-implantation procedure should be well prepared for the complexity related to the right-side approach and occlusion/stenosis of the previous CV.

摘要

背景

接受心脏再同步治疗的患者数量有所增加。因此,由于感染或故障,冠状动脉(CV)导线的移除和重新植入的频率也有所增加。

方法和结果

共回顾了 345 例连续转诊进行导线拔除的患者。其中,对 34 例接受 CV 导线拔除的患者进行了调查。CV 导线拔除的指征为 29 例患者的器械相关感染和 5 例患者的导线故障。CV 导线的平均使用时间为 4.1±3.8 年。所有 CV 导线均成功拔除,无重大并发症,但有 1 例院内死亡。21 例患者(62%)通过简单牵引(ST)成功拔除 CV 导线,13 例患者(38%)需要使用拔除工具。局部感染和 CV 导线留置时间与 ST 的成功显著相关(P=0.04 和 P=0.014)。25 例患者成功进行了 CV 导线重新植入,但 92%的患者需要右侧入路,80%的患者观察到之前 CV 的闭塞/狭窄。

结论

CV 导线的拔除相对较为成功且安全。局部感染和较短的导线留置时间可能有助于 CV 导线的 ST。然而,重新植入程序应充分准备好应对右侧入路和先前 CV 闭塞/狭窄相关的复杂性。

相似文献

1
Technical Features and Clinical Outcomes of Coronary Venous Left Ventricular Lead Removal and Reimplantation.冠状动脉左心室静脉导线移除和再植入的技术特点和临床结果。
Circ J. 2021 Jul 21;85(8):1349-1355. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-1199. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
2
Cardiac venous left ventricular lead removal and reimplantation following device infection: a large single-center experience.心脏静脉左心室导线移除和再植入后设备感染:大型单中心经验。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Nov;23(11):1213-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02392.x. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
3
Complications of permanent cardiac pacing in patients with persistent left superior vena cava.永存左上腔静脉患者永久性心脏起搏的并发症
Cardiol J. 2014;21(2):128-37. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2014.0006. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
4
The use of laser lead extraction sheath in the presence of supra-cardiac occlusion of the central veins for cardiac implantable electronic device lead upgrade or revision.使用激光导丝提取鞘管在中心静脉心腔以上阻断的情况下进行心脏植入式电子装置导线升级或修复。
PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0251829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251829. eCollection 2021.
5
Cardiac resynchronization therapy coronary venous left ventricular lead removal and reimplantation: Experience from a single center in China.心脏再同步治疗冠状动脉静脉左心室导线拔除与重新植入:来自中国单中心的经验
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Sep;18(3):2213-2218. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7818. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
6
Initial experience with the TightRail™ Rotating Mechanical Dilator Sheath for transvenous lead extraction.用于经静脉导线拔除的TightRail™旋转机械扩张器鞘管的初步经验。
Europace. 2016 Jul;18(7):1043-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv245. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
7
Laser lead extraction to facilitate cardiac implantable electronic device upgrade and revision in the presence of central venous obstruction.激光导线取出术在存在中心静脉阻塞的情况下促进心脏植入式电子设备的升级和修订。
Europace. 2014 Jan;16(1):81-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut163. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
8
Outcomes and predictors of difficulty with coronary sinus lead removal.冠状静脉窦导线拔除困难的结局及预测因素
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;35(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s10840-012-9685-2. Epub 2012 May 15.
9
Low lateral thoracic site for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: A viable alternative in patients with limited access options after infected device extraction.低位侧胸部位用于心脏植入式电子设备植入:在感染性设备取出后,对于可选择入路有限的患者,这是一种可行的替代方法。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):1506-1514. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
10
Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia.使用导线锁定装置系统进行心脏植入式电子设备导线拔除:借助机械工具和局部麻醉,使其操作简便、安全且成本低廉。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2017 Oct;18(4):289-295. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7821. Epub 2017 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful coronary sinus left ventricular lead extraction 9 years postimplantation using the wire ThRoUgh Snare Twice (wire TRUST) technique.采用两次钢丝圈套取出术(wire TRUST)在植入9年后成功取出冠状窦左心室导线。
Clin Case Rep. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e9039. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.9039. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Hybrid transvenous and surgical approach for the extraction of coronary sinus leads: A case series.经静脉杂交与手术方法联合取出冠状窦导线:病例系列研究。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Jul;45(7):861-865. doi: 10.1111/pace.14536. Epub 2022 Jun 10.