• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predictors of academic integrity in undergraduate and graduate-entry masters occupational therapy students.本科及研究生入学硕士职业治疗专业学生学术诚信的预测因素。
Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2020 Dec;33(2):42-54. doi: 10.1177/1569186120968035. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
2
Exploring similarities and differences among the self-reported academic integrity of Australian occupational therapy domestic and international students.探索澳大利亚职业治疗国内外学生自我报告的学术诚信之间的异同。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Nov;70:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
3
Descriptive profile of the academic integrity of Australian occupational therapy students.澳大利亚职业治疗专业学生学术诚信的描述性概况。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Aug;65(4):285-294. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12472. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
4
Registered nurses understanding of academic honesty and the perceived relationship to professional conduct: Findings from a cross-sectional survey conducted in Southeast Asia.注册护士对学术诚信的理解及其与职业行为的感知关系:在东南亚进行的横断面调查的结果。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 May;100:104794. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104794. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
5
The impact of gender and academic achievement on the violation of academic integrity for medical faculty students, a descriptive cross-sectional survey study.性别和学业成绩对医学生学术诚信违规行为的影响:一项描述性横断面调查研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Nov 20;19(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1865-7.
6
Croatian medical students see academic dishonesty as an acceptable behaviour: a cross-sectional multicampus study.克罗地亚医学生视学术不端为可接受行为:一项跨校区横断面研究。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Jun;38(6):376-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100015. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
7
Nursing Students' Perspectives on Academic Dishonesty During Examinations and Assignments: A Cross-Sectional Study.护理专业学生对考试和作业中学术不诚实行为的看法:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 17;16(1):e52418. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52418. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Exploring the relationship between resilience and practice education placement success in occupational therapy students.探索职业治疗专业学生的心理韧性与实习教育安置成功之间的关系。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2020 Feb;67(1):49-61. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12622. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
9
Academic integrity in online examinations in a graduate nurse practitioner program: Student perceptions and lessons for nurse educators.研究生护士从业者项目中在线考试的学术诚信:学生的看法及对护士教育者的启示。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Dec;107:105099. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105099. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
10
An honest cheater: perception of self-concept, academic and clinical dishonesty among nursing students.诚实的骗子:护理专业学生的自我认知、学术和临床不诚实感知。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jul;114:105406. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105406. Epub 2022 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The hidden influence: Medical students' knowledge and attitude of conflict of interest-A cross-sectional study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.潜在影响:医学生对利益冲突的认知与态度——沙特阿拉伯吉达的一项横断面研究
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 1;20(8):e0328884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328884. eCollection 2025.
2
Status of scientific research integrity knowledge in dental undergraduates from 34 universities in China.中国34所大学牙科本科生的科研诚信知识状况。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Feb 22;26(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01183-8.
3
Artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, and dental education: Implications for reflective assignments and qualitative research.人工智能、ChatGPT与牙科教育:对反思性作业和定性研究的影响
J Dent Educ. 2024 Dec;88(12):1671-1680. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13663. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
4
Predictors of Academic and Fieldwork Performance in Occupational Therapy Students: A Systematic Review.职业治疗学生学业和实地工作表现的预测因素:系统评价。
Occup Ther Int. 2023 Nov 25;2023:7281505. doi: 10.1155/2023/7281505. eCollection 2023.
5
Exploration of Students' Perception of Academic Misconduct: Do Individual Factors, Moral Philosophy, Behavioral Intention, and Judgment Matter?探索学生对学术不端行为的认知:个人因素、道德哲学、行为意图和判断是否重要?
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 5;13:857943. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.857943. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Approaches to studying predict academic performance in undergraduate occupational therapy students: a cross-cultural study.研究方法对本科职业治疗专业学生学业成绩的预测作用:一项跨文化研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 May 2;17(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0914-3.
2
Examining perceptions of academic stress and its sources among university students: The Perception of Academic Stress Scale.考察大学生对学业压力及其来源的认知:学业压力感知量表
Health Psychol Open. 2015 Jul 30;2(2):2055102915596714. doi: 10.1177/2055102915596714. eCollection 2015 Jul.
3
Motivations and Predictors of Cheating in Pharmacy School.药学院作弊行为的动机与预测因素。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Oct 25;80(8):133. doi: 10.5688/ajpe808133.
4
The relationship between approaches to study and academic performance among Australian undergraduate occupational therapy students.澳大利亚本科职业治疗专业学生的学习方法与学业成绩之间的关系。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2017 Jun;64(3):218-225. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12340. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
5
The Profile of Academic Offenders: Features of Students Who Admit to Academic Dishonesty.学术违规者的概况:承认学术不诚实行为的学生特征。
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Aug 29;22:3043-55. doi: 10.12659/msm.898810.
6
Longitudinal Study of Occupational Therapy Students' Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing.职业治疗专业学生关于知识与认知信念的纵向研究
Am J Occup Ther. 2015 Mar-Apr;69(2):6902230010. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2015.015008.
7
Academic dishonesty among health science school students.健康科学专业学生中的学术不诚实行为。
Nurs Ethics. 2016 Dec;23(8):919-931. doi: 10.1177/0969733015583929. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
Academic dishonesty in schools of nursing: a literature review.学校护理专业的学术不端行为:文献综述。
J Nurs Educ. 2014 Mar;53(3):121-5. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140205-01. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
9
Academic dishonesty among nursing students.护理学生中的学术不诚实行为。
J Nurs Educ. 2014 Feb;53(2):77-87. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140122-06. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
10
Academic dishonesty and ethical reasoning: pharmacy and medical school students in New Zealand.学术不端与伦理推理:新西兰的药学与医学院学生
Med Teach. 2013 Jun;35(6):e1211-7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.737962. Epub 2012 Nov 12.

本科及研究生入学硕士职业治疗专业学生学术诚信的预测因素。

Predictors of academic integrity in undergraduate and graduate-entry masters occupational therapy students.

作者信息

Brown Ted, Isbel Stephen, Logan Alexandra, Etherington Jamie

机构信息

Monash University - Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.

The University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

出版信息

Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2020 Dec;33(2):42-54. doi: 10.1177/1569186120968035. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1177/1569186120968035
PMID:33815023
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8008377/
Abstract

Academic integrity is viewed as honest and responsible scholarship and the moral code of academia. Reported incidences of academic dishonesty among health professional students are widespread and may be an indicator of future unprofessional behaviour in the workplace. This study investigated the potential predictors of academic integrity in undergraduate and graduate-entry masters occupational therapy students. Occupational therapy students from five universities ( = 701 participants; 609 undergraduates; 92 graduate-entry masters) were recruited. Data were collected via a two-part self-report questionnaire that included six standardised scales: and Data analysis involved multi-linear regression analyses with bootstrapping. Significant predictors of academic integrity in occupational therapy students included age, gender, grade point average, public meaning, moral practice, general tendency towards cheating, tendency towards dishonesty in the conduct and reporting of research findings, tendency towards not providing appropriate references and acknowledgements and pressures to perform well academically. These findings will assist educators in identifying vulnerable students potentially prone to academic integrity infringements and implementing proactive strategies with them. Further studies are recommended to explore further predictors of students' academic integrity.

摘要

学术诚信被视为诚实且负责的学术行为以及学术界的道德准则。据报道,健康专业学生中存在学术不诚实行为的情况很普遍,这可能是未来工作场所中不专业行为的一个指标。本研究调查了本科和研究生入学的职业治疗专业学生学术诚信的潜在预测因素。招募了来自五所大学的职业治疗专业学生(共701名参与者;609名本科生;92名研究生入学硕士)。通过一份分为两部分的自我报告问卷收集数据,该问卷包括六个标准化量表: 以及 数据分析采用了带有自抽样法的多元线性回归分析。职业治疗专业学生学术诚信的显著预测因素包括年龄、性别、平均绩点、公众意义、道德实践、作弊的总体倾向、在研究结果的行为和报告中不诚实的倾向、不提供适当参考文献和致谢的倾向以及学业上取得优异成绩的压力。这些发现将有助于教育工作者识别可能容易违反学术诚信的脆弱学生,并与他们实施积极主动的策略。建议进一步开展研究,以探索学生学术诚信的更多预测因素。