Brown Ted, Isbel Stephen, Logan Alexandra, Etherington Jamie
Monash University - Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2020 Dec;33(2):42-54. doi: 10.1177/1569186120968035. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
Academic integrity is viewed as honest and responsible scholarship and the moral code of academia. Reported incidences of academic dishonesty among health professional students are widespread and may be an indicator of future unprofessional behaviour in the workplace. This study investigated the potential predictors of academic integrity in undergraduate and graduate-entry masters occupational therapy students. Occupational therapy students from five universities ( = 701 participants; 609 undergraduates; 92 graduate-entry masters) were recruited. Data were collected via a two-part self-report questionnaire that included six standardised scales: and Data analysis involved multi-linear regression analyses with bootstrapping. Significant predictors of academic integrity in occupational therapy students included age, gender, grade point average, public meaning, moral practice, general tendency towards cheating, tendency towards dishonesty in the conduct and reporting of research findings, tendency towards not providing appropriate references and acknowledgements and pressures to perform well academically. These findings will assist educators in identifying vulnerable students potentially prone to academic integrity infringements and implementing proactive strategies with them. Further studies are recommended to explore further predictors of students' academic integrity.
学术诚信被视为诚实且负责的学术行为以及学术界的道德准则。据报道,健康专业学生中存在学术不诚实行为的情况很普遍,这可能是未来工作场所中不专业行为的一个指标。本研究调查了本科和研究生入学的职业治疗专业学生学术诚信的潜在预测因素。招募了来自五所大学的职业治疗专业学生(共701名参与者;609名本科生;92名研究生入学硕士)。通过一份分为两部分的自我报告问卷收集数据,该问卷包括六个标准化量表: 以及 数据分析采用了带有自抽样法的多元线性回归分析。职业治疗专业学生学术诚信的显著预测因素包括年龄、性别、平均绩点、公众意义、道德实践、作弊的总体倾向、在研究结果的行为和报告中不诚实的倾向、不提供适当参考文献和致谢的倾向以及学业上取得优异成绩的压力。这些发现将有助于教育工作者识别可能容易违反学术诚信的脆弱学生,并与他们实施积极主动的策略。建议进一步开展研究,以探索学生学术诚信的更多预测因素。