Brown Ted, Isbel Stephen, Bourke-Taylor Helen, Gustafsson Louise, McKinstry Carol, Logan Alexandra
Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University - Peninsula Campus, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
Faculty of Health and Health Research Institute, The University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Aug;65(4):285-294. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12472. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
Academic integrity is the moral code of academia. Students who demonstrate trustworthiness in an academic setting are more likely to be dependable in a clinical setting. It is, therefore, important for occupational therapy academic and fieldwork educators to know the academic integrity profile of their students and to address any areas of academic dishonesty in curriculum design and delivery. To date, there has been no baseline description of the academic honesty profile of Australian occupational therapy students.
To establish a baseline of academic integrity and academic dishonesty among occupational therapy undergraduate and graduate-entry masters students in a cohort of Australian students.
Seven hundred and one students from five Australian universities completed a self-report questionnaire comprising demographic questions and six standardised scales measuring academic integrity.
Overall, occupational therapy students reported high levels of academic and fieldwork integrity; however, some areas of concerns exist. Students report copying material without citations at least once during their studies (55%), obtaining test questions at least once during their studies (42.6%) or padding out a bibliography (39.5%).
Occupational therapy education needs to continue to emphasise the importance of academic and fieldwork integrity. Students need to be explicitly taught what academic honesty and dishonesty is and be provided with the resources and time to complete academic work to reduce the risk of academic dishonesty.
学术诚信是学术界的道德准则。在学术环境中表现出诚信的学生在临床环境中更有可能值得信赖。因此,职业治疗学术和实习教育工作者了解学生的学术诚信情况,并在课程设计和授课过程中处理任何学术不诚实问题非常重要。迄今为止,尚未有对澳大利亚职业治疗专业学生学术诚信情况的基线描述。
在一组澳大利亚学生中,建立职业治疗本科学生和研究生入学硕士学生学术诚信和学术不诚实的基线。
来自澳大利亚五所大学的701名学生完成了一份自我报告问卷,其中包括人口统计学问题和六个衡量学术诚信的标准化量表。
总体而言,职业治疗专业学生报告的学术和实习诚信水平较高;然而,仍存在一些令人担忧的领域。学生报告在学习期间至少有一次抄袭材料未注明出处(55%)、在学习期间至少有一次获取考试题目(42.6%)或在参考文献中注水(39.5%)。
职业治疗教育需要继续强调学术和实习诚信的重要性。需要明确教导学生什么是学术诚实和不诚实,并为他们提供完成学术作业所需的资源和时间,以降低学术不诚实的风险。