Wang Ziyu, Zhu Rongjuan, You Xuqun
Key Laboratory for Behavior and Cognitive Neuroscience of Shaanxi Province, School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 18;12:630239. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630239. eCollection 2021.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been previously used to investigate the causal relationships between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and task switching but has delivered inconclusive results that may be due to different switching tasks involving different cognitive control processes. In the current study, we manipulated task types and task predictability to investigate the role of DLPFC in task-switching performances. Notably, we distinguished the specific effects of anodal-tDCS on two types of tasks (parity/magnitude and parity/vowel-consonant tasks). Forty-eight participants were randomly assigned to four task groups as follows; Group I who was assigned right anode (RA) parity/magnitude tasks, Group II who were assigned sham parity/magnitude tasks, Group III who were assigned RA parity/vowel-consonant tasks, and Group IV who were assigned sham parity/vowel-consonant tasks. Participants were asked to complete both predictable and unpredictable tasks. In the parity/magnitude task, we demonstrated a lower switch cost for the RA group compared to the sham group for unpredictable tasks. In contrast, in the parity/vowel-consonant task, the switch cost was higher for the RA group compared to the sham group for unpredictable and predictable tasks. These findings confirmed an anodal-tDCS-induced effect over the right DLPFC both in the parity/magnitude and parity/vowel-consonant tasks. Our data indicated that anodal tDCS may have a stronger influence on task-switching performance over the right DLPFC by changing the irrelevant task-set inhibition process. Also, the right DLPFC is unlikely to act by performing exogenous adjustment of predictable task switching.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)此前已被用于研究背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)与任务切换之间的因果关系,但得出的结果尚无定论,这可能是由于不同的切换任务涉及不同的认知控制过程。在本研究中,我们操纵任务类型和任务可预测性,以研究DLPFC在任务切换表现中的作用。值得注意的是,我们区分了阳极tDCS对两种任务类型(奇偶性/大小和奇偶性/元音-辅音任务)的特定影响。48名参与者被随机分配到以下四个任务组:第一组被分配右阳极(RA)奇偶性/大小任务,第二组被分配伪奇偶性/大小任务,第三组被分配RA奇偶性/元音-辅音任务,第四组被分配伪奇偶性/元音-辅音任务。参与者被要求完成可预测和不可预测的任务。在奇偶性/大小任务中,我们发现对于不可预测的任务,RA组的切换成本低于伪刺激组。相比之下,在奇偶性/元音-辅音任务中,对于不可预测和可预测的任务,RA组的切换成本均高于伪刺激组。这些发现证实了阳极tDCS在奇偶性/大小任务和奇偶性/元音-辅音任务中对右侧DLPFC均有诱导作用。我们的数据表明,阳极tDCS可能通过改变无关任务集抑制过程,对右侧DLPFC的任务切换表现产生更强的影响。此外,右侧DLPFC不太可能通过对外源性可预测任务切换进行调整来发挥作用。