Mourad Ahmed I, Gniadecki Robert
Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 18;7:625755. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.625755. eCollection 2020.
Drug survival studies have been utilized to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of biologics used in psoriasis. However, the increasing volume of drug survival data suffers from large variability due to regional differences in drug availability, patient selection and biologic reimbursement. The objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of biologic drug survival to determine comparative effectiveness of the biologics in a real-world setting. Studies reporting drug survival for biologic therapy in psoriasis were identified by a systematic literature search. Hazard ratio data for drug discontinuation were estimated directly from published Kaplan-Meier estimator curves at year 1, 2, and 5 of treatment and compared pairwise for the following biologics: ustekinumab, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, secukinumab, and ixekizumab. This pooled hazard ratios were used to estimate 2- and 5-year overall drug survival rates. Ustekinumab had the longest persistence at 2 and 5 years among all biologics included in this meta-analysis. Adalimumab was superior to etanercept and infliximab at 5 years. Pooled 5-year drug survival rates for adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab were 46.3, 35.9, and 34.7%, respectively. Two- and five-year data were not available for anti-IL-17 drugs, but at 1-year ustekinumab outperformed secukinumab, the latter being equal to anti-TNFs. In conclusion, ustekinumab is characterized by longer drug survival than TNF inhibitors and IL-17 inhibitors. Estimated pooled 2- and 5-year drug survival rates may serve as a useful tool for patient communication and clinical decision-making.
药物生存研究已被用于评估用于治疗银屑病的生物制剂的真实疗效。然而,由于药物可及性、患者选择和生物制剂报销方面的地区差异,药物生存数据量的不断增加存在很大的变异性。本研究的目的是对生物制剂的药物生存情况进行荟萃分析,以确定这些生物制剂在真实环境中的相对疗效。通过系统的文献检索,确定了报告银屑病生物治疗药物生存情况的研究。直接从已发表的治疗第1、2和5年的Kaplan-Meier估计曲线中估算药物停用的风险比数据,并对以下生物制剂进行两两比较:优特克单抗、阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、司库奇尤单抗和伊克西单抗。这些汇总的风险比用于估计2年和5年的总体药物生存率。在本荟萃分析纳入的所有生物制剂中,优特克单抗在2年和5年时的持续时间最长。阿达木单抗在5年时优于依那西普和英夫利昔单抗。阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗的汇总5年药物生存率分别为46.3%、35.9%和34.7%。抗IL-17药物没有2年和5年的数据,但在1年时优特克单抗优于司库奇尤单抗,后者与抗TNF药物相当。总之,优特克单抗的药物生存时间比TNF抑制剂和IL-17抑制剂更长。估计的汇总2年和5年药物生存率可作为患者沟通和临床决策的有用工具。