Doshi Jalpa A, Takeshita Junko, Pinto Lionel, Li Penxiang, Yu Xinyan, Rao Preethi, Viswanathan Hema N, Gelfand Joel M
Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Jun;74(6):1057-1065.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.01.048. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
Studies indicate adherence to biologics among patients with psoriasis is low, yet little is known about their use in the Medicare population.
We sought to investigate real-world utilization patterns in a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries with psoriasis initiating infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, or ustekinumab.
We conducted a retrospective claims analysis using 2009 through 2012 100% Medicare Chronic Condition Data Warehouse Part A, B, and D files, with 12-month follow-up after index prescription. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were used to examine rates of and factors associated with biologic adherence, discontinuation, switching, and restarting.
We examined 2707 patients initiating adalimumab (40.0%), etanercept (37.9%), infliximab (11.7%), and ustekinumab (10.3%); during 12-month follow-up, 38% were adherent and 46% discontinued treatment, with 8% switching to another biologic and 9% later restarting biologic treatment. Being female and being ineligible for low-income subsidies were associated with increased odds of decreased adherence. Outcomes varied by index biologic.
Patient-reported reasons for nonadherence or gaps in treatment are unavailable in claims data.
Medicare patients initiating biologics for psoriasis had low adherence and high discontinuation rates. Further investigation into reasons for inconsistent utilization, including exploration of patient and provider decision-making and barriers to more consistent treatment, is needed.
研究表明,银屑病患者对生物制剂的依从性较低,但对于它们在医疗保险人群中的使用情况却知之甚少。
我们试图调查全国范围内开始使用英夫利昔单抗、依那西普、阿达木单抗或乌司奴单抗的银屑病医疗保险受益人的实际使用模式。
我们使用2009年至2012年医疗保险慢性病数据仓库100%的A、B和D部分文件进行了回顾性索赔分析,并在索引处方后进行了12个月的随访。采用描述性和多变量分析来检查生物制剂依从性、停药、换药和重新开始治疗的发生率及相关因素。
我们研究了2707例开始使用阿达木单抗(40.0%)、依那西普(37.9%)、英夫利昔单抗(11.7%)和乌司奴单抗(10.3%)的患者;在12个月的随访中,38%的患者依从治疗,46%的患者停药,8%的患者换用了另一种生物制剂,9%的患者后来重新开始生物制剂治疗。女性和无资格获得低收入补贴与依从性降低的几率增加有关。不同的索引生物制剂的结果有所不同。
索赔数据中没有患者报告的不依从或治疗中断原因。
开始使用生物制剂治疗银屑病的医疗保险患者依从性低,停药率高。需要进一步调查使用不一致的原因,包括探索患者和提供者的决策过程以及更持续治疗的障碍。