Waterland Jamie L, McCourt Orla, Edbrooke Lara, Granger Catherine L, Ismail Hilmy, Riedel Bernhard, Denehy Linda
Department of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Front Surg. 2021 Mar 19;8:628848. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.628848. eCollection 2021.
This systematic review set out to identify, evaluate and synthesise the evidence examining the effect of prehabilitation including exercise on postoperative outcomes following abdominal cancer surgery. Five electronic databases (MEDLINE 1946-2020, EMBASE 1947-2020, CINAHL 1937-2020, PEDro 1999-2020, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials 1991-2020) were systematically searched (until August 2020) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effects of prehabilitation interventions in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery. This review included any form of prehabilitation either unimodal or multimodal that included whole body and/or respiratory exercises as a stand-alone intervention or in addition to other prehabilitation interventions (such as nutrition and psychology) compared to standard care. Twenty-two studies were included in the systematic review and 21 studies in the meta-analysis. There was moderate quality of evidence that multimodal prehabilitation improves pre-operative functional capacity as measured by 6 min walk distance (Mean difference [MD] 33.09 metres, 95% CI 17.69-48.50; = <0.01) but improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness such as preoperative oxygen consumption at peak exercise (VO peak; MD 1.74 mL/kg/min, 95% CI -0.03-3.50; = 0.05) and anaerobic threshold (AT; MD 1.21 mL/kg/min, 95% CI -0.34-2.76; = 0.13) were not significant. A reduction in hospital length of stay (MD 3.68 days, 95% CI 0.92-6.44; = 0.009) was observed but no effect was observed for postoperative complications (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.55-1.18; = 0.27), pulmonary complications (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28-1.01; = 0.05), hospital re-admission (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.61-1.90; = 0.81) or postoperative mortality (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.43-2.09, = 0.90). Multimodal prehabilitation improves preoperative functional capacity with reduction in hospital length of stay. This supports the need for ongoing research on innovative cost-effective prehabilitation approaches, research within large multicentre studies to verify this effect and to explore implementation strategies within clinical practise.
本系统评价旨在识别、评估和综合有关术前康复(包括运动)对腹部癌症手术后结局影响的证据。我们系统检索了五个电子数据库(MEDLINE 1946 - 2020、EMBASE 1947 - 2020、CINAHL 1937 - 2020、PEDro 1999 - 2020以及Cochrane对照试验中央注册库1991 - 2020)(截至2020年8月),以查找调查术前康复干预对接受腹部癌症手术患者影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。本评价纳入任何形式的术前康复,无论是单模式还是多模式,包括全身和/或呼吸运动作为独立干预措施,或除其他术前康复干预措施(如营养和心理干预)之外的干预措施,并与标准护理进行比较。系统评价纳入了22项研究,荟萃分析纳入了21项研究。有中等质量的证据表明,多模式术前康复可改善术前功能能力,以6分钟步行距离衡量(平均差[MD] 33.09米,95%置信区间17.69 - 48.50;P = <0.01),但心肺适能的改善,如术前运动峰值时的耗氧量(VO₂峰值;MD 1.74 mL/kg/min,95%置信区间 - 0.03 - 3.50;P = 0.05)和无氧阈值(AT;MD 1.21 mL/kg/min,95%置信区间 - 0.34 - 2.76;P = 0.13)并不显著。观察到住院时间缩短(MD 3.68天,95%置信区间0.92 - 6.44;P = 0.009),但术后并发症(优势比[OR] 0.81,95%置信区间0.55 - 1.18;P = 0.27)、肺部并发症(OR 0.53,95%置信区间0.28 - 1.01;P = 0.05)、再次住院(OR 1.07,95%置信区间0.61 - 1.90;P = 0.81)或术后死亡率(OR 0.95,95%置信区间0.43 - 2.09;P = 0.90)均无影响。多模式术前康复可改善术前功能能力并缩短住院时间。这支持了对创新的具有成本效益的术前康复方法进行持续研究的必要性,在大型多中心研究中开展研究以验证这种效果,并探索临床实践中的实施策略。