• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究驾驶员头部位置与视线落点之间的对应关系。

Investigating the correspondence between driver head position and glance location.

作者信息

Lee Joonbum, Muñoz Mauricio, Fridman Lex, Victor Trent, Reimer Bryan, Mehler Bruce

机构信息

AgeLab and New England University Transportation Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.

Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

PeerJ Comput Sci. 2018 Feb 19;4:e146. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.146. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.146
PMID:33816802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7924698/
Abstract

The relationship between a driver's glance orientation and corresponding head rotation is highly complex due to its nonlinear dependence on the individual, task, and driving context. This paper presents expanded analytic detail and findings from an effort that explored the ability of head pose to serve as an estimator for driver gaze by connecting head rotation data with manually coded gaze region data using both a statistical analysis approach and a predictive (i.e., machine learning) approach. For the latter, classification accuracy increased as visual angles between two glance locations increased. In other words, the greater the shift in gaze, the higher the accuracy of classification. This is an intuitive but important concept that we make explicit through our analysis. The highest accuracy achieved was 83% using the method of Hidden Markov Models (HMM) for the binary gaze classification problem of (a) glances to the forward roadway versus (b) glances to the center stack. Results suggest that although there are individual differences in head-glance correspondence while driving, classifier models based on head-rotation data may be robust to these differences and therefore can serve as reasonable estimators for glance location. The results suggest that driver head pose can be used as a surrogate for eye gaze in several key conditions including the identification of high-eccentricity glances. Inexpensive driver head pose tracking may be a key element in detection systems developed to mitigate driver distraction and inattention.

摘要

由于驾驶员的视线方向与相应头部转动之间的关系对个体、任务和驾驶环境存在非线性依赖,所以这种关系极为复杂。本文详细介绍了一项分析研究及其结果,该研究通过运用统计分析方法和预测(即机器学习)方法,将头部转动数据与人工编码的注视区域数据相联系,探讨了头部姿态作为驾驶员注视估计器的能力。对于后者,随着两个视线位置之间视角的增加,分类准确率也随之提高。换句话说,注视的偏移越大,分类的准确率就越高。这是一个直观但重要的概念,我们通过分析将其明确呈现出来。对于(a)向前方道路的注视与(b)向中控台的注视这一二元注视分类问题,使用隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)方法所达到的最高准确率为83%。结果表明,尽管驾驶时头部与视线的对应存在个体差异,但基于头部转动数据的分类器模型可能对这些差异具有鲁棒性,因此可以作为视线位置的合理估计器。结果表明,在包括识别高偏心率注视在内的几个关键条件下,驾驶员头部姿态可以用作眼睛注视的替代指标。廉价的驾驶员头部姿态跟踪可能是为减轻驾驶员分心和注意力不集中而开发的检测系统中的一个关键要素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/7fb749fa8377/peerj-cs-04-146-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/61215c236799/peerj-cs-04-146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/b46f3187a6f3/peerj-cs-04-146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/3680e3634b25/peerj-cs-04-146-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/5f2a4585a71b/peerj-cs-04-146-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/64bb4fcab84c/peerj-cs-04-146-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/ada14bf76c1e/peerj-cs-04-146-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/7fb749fa8377/peerj-cs-04-146-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/61215c236799/peerj-cs-04-146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/b46f3187a6f3/peerj-cs-04-146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/3680e3634b25/peerj-cs-04-146-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/5f2a4585a71b/peerj-cs-04-146-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/64bb4fcab84c/peerj-cs-04-146-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/ada14bf76c1e/peerj-cs-04-146-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a16b/7924698/7fb749fa8377/peerj-cs-04-146-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating the correspondence between driver head position and glance location.研究驾驶员头部位置与视线落点之间的对应关系。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2018 Feb 19;4:e146. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.146. eCollection 2018.
2
Detection and response to critical lead vehicle deceleration events with peripheral vision: Glance response times are independent of visual eccentricity.利用周边视觉检测和响应关键前车减速事件:扫视响应时间与视觉偏心率无关。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Feb;150:105853. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105853. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
3
Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.乐观的看法:在“百车”数据中,行车时的扫视指标能区分撞车事故和险些撞车事故。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Oct;107:48-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
4
A Driver Gaze Estimation Method Based on Deep Learning.基于深度学习的驾驶员注视估计方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 23;22(10):3959. doi: 10.3390/s22103959.
5
The impact of billboards on driver visual behavior: a systematic literature review.广告牌对驾驶员视觉行为的影响:系统文献回顾。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16:234-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.936407.
6
Eye Tracking in Driver Attention Research-How Gaze Data Interpretations Influence What We Learn.驾驶员注意力研究中的眼动追踪——注视数据解读如何影响我们所学内容。
Front Neuroergon. 2021 Dec 8;2:778043. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2021.778043. eCollection 2021.
7
European NCAP Driver State Monitoring Protocols: Prevalence of Distraction in Naturalistic Driving.欧洲新车安全评鉴协会驾驶员状态监测协议:自然驾驶中的分心现象发生率。
Hum Factors. 2024 Sep;66(9):2205-2217. doi: 10.1177/00187208231194543. Epub 2023 Aug 20.
8
The effects of momentary visual disruption on hazard anticipation and awareness in driving.瞬间视觉干扰对驾驶中危险预判和察觉的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(2):133-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.909593. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
9
On the Difference Between Necessary and Unnecessary Glances Away From the Forward Roadway: An Occlusion Study on the Motorway.在离开前方车道路面的必要与不必要扫视之间的差异:高速公路上的一项封闭视野研究。
Hum Factors. 2020 Nov;62(7):1117-1131. doi: 10.1177/0018720819866946. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
10
Driver's Head Pose and Gaze Zone Estimation Based on Multi-Zone Templates Registration and Multi-Frame Point Cloud Fusion.基于多区域模板配准和多帧点云融合的驾驶员头部姿势和注视区域估计。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 20;22(9):3154. doi: 10.3390/s22093154.

引用本文的文献

1
Driving With Hemianopia VII: Predicting Hazard Detection With Gaze and Head Scan Magnitude.单侧忽略驾驶 VII:基于注视和头部扫描幅度预测危险察觉。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Jan 11;10(1):20. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.1.20. eCollection 2021 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
How dangerous is looking away from the road? Algorithms predict crash risk from glance patterns in naturalistic driving.开车时不看路有多危险?算法通过自然驾驶中的注视模式预测事故风险。
Hum Factors. 2012 Dec;54(6):1104-16. doi: 10.1177/0018720812446965.
2
Head pose estimation in computer vision: a survey.计算机视觉中的头部姿态估计:一项综述。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2009 Apr;31(4):607-26. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2008.106.
3
Glance analysis of driver eye movements to evaluate distraction.通过扫视分析驾驶员眼睛运动来评估分心情况。
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Nov;34(4):529-38. doi: 10.3758/bf03195482.
4
Steering with the head. the visual strategy of a racing driver.用头部转向:赛车手的视觉策略。
Curr Biol. 2001 Aug 7;11(15):1215-20. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00351-7.