Department of Ophthalmology, Kutahya Health Sciences University School of Medicine, Kutahya, Turkey.
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan-Mar;65(1):59-63. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2021.11.
To evaluate how capsular tension rings (CTR) affect refractive outcomes following cataract extraction by phacoemulsification complicated by zonular instability. Retrospective. In a retrospective case-control study, the 29 eyes of 29 patients with CTRs were compared with the 29 eyes of patients without zonular instability following routine phacoemulsification, with mean arithmetic refractive prediction error (ArRPE) and mean absolute refractive prediction error (AbRPE) as primary outcome measures. A comparison of eyes with and without CTRs according to the SRK/ T formula revealed no statistically significant difference in ArRPE (0.52 vs. 0.45 D, p = 0.570) or AbRPE (0.52 vs. 0.55 D, p = 0.799). Postoperative hypermetropic shift occurred in most cases in both groups, although the mean difference between eyes with CTR (22/ 29) and without CTR (25/ 29) was not statistically significant (p = 0.315). Implanting CTRs did not consistently affect refractive outcomes versus routine phacoemulsification. Results suggest that intraocular lens power can be calculated as usual when CTRs are used. CTR = capsular tension ring, ArRPE = arithmetic refractive prediction errors, AbRPE = absolute refractive prediction errors, IOL = intraocular lens, WTW = white-to-white, ACD = anterior chamber depths, AL = axial lengths, RPE = refractive prediction error.
评估在白内障超声乳化术中因悬韧带不稳定而使用囊带张力环(CTR)对屈光结果的影响。回顾性。在一项回顾性病例对照研究中,将 29 只眼的 29 例患者的 CTR 与 29 例无悬韧带不稳定的常规白内障超声乳化术后患者进行比较,以平均算术屈光预测误差(ArRPE)和平均绝对屈光预测误差(AbRPE)作为主要观察指标。根据 SRK/T 公式比较有和无 CTR 的眼,ArRPE(0.52 对 0.45D,p=0.570)或 AbRPE(0.52 对 0.55D,p=0.799)无统计学差异。两组术后均发生远视漂移,但使用 CTR 的眼(22/29)与未使用 CTR 的眼(25/29)之间的平均差异无统计学意义(p=0.315)。植入 CTR 并未一致影响屈光结果与常规白内障超声乳化术。结果表明,当使用 CTR 时,可照常计算人工晶状体的度数。CTR=囊带张力环,ArRPE=算术屈光预测误差,AbRPE=绝对屈光预测误差,IOL=人工晶状体,WTW=白对白,ACD=前房深度,AL=眼轴长度,RPE=屈光预测误差。