Suppr超能文献

与标准产房相比,在“分娩环境室”分娩是否会降低引产率?——一项随机对照试验的结果。

Does giving birth in a "birth environment room" versus a standard birth room lower augmentation of labor? - Results from a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Lorentzen Iben Prentow, Andersen Charlotte S, Jensen Henriette Svenstrup, Fogsgaard Ann, Foureur Maralyn, Lauszus Finn Friis, Nohr Ellen Aagaard

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gl. Landevej 61, 7400, Herning, Denmark.

Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Hunter New England Health and University of Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2021 Mar 13;10:100125. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2021.100125. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In the last decade, there has been an increased interest in exploring the impact of the physical birth environment on midwifery practice and women's birth experiences. This study is based on the hypothesis that the environment for birth needs greater attention to improve some of the existing challenges in modern obstetric practice, for example the increasing use of augmentation and number of interventions during delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial was carried out to study the effect of giving birth in a specially designed "birth environment room" on the use of augmentation during labor. The study took place at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herning Hospital, Denmark and included 680 nulliparous women in spontaneous labor at term with a fetus in cephalic presentation. Women were randomly allocated to either the "birth environment room" or a standard birth room. The primary outcome was augmentation of labor by use of oxytocin. Secondary outcomes were duration of labor, use of pharmacological pain relief, and mode of birth. Differences were estimated as relative risks (RR) and presented with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

No difference was found on the primary outcome, augmentation of labor (29.1% in the "birth environment room" versus 30.6% in the standard room, RR 0.97; 0.89-1.08). More women in the "birth environment room" used the bathtub (60.6% versus 52.4%, RR 1.18; 1.02-1.37), whereas a tendency to lower use of epidural analgesia (22.6% versus 28.2%) did not reach statistical significance (RR 0.87; 0.74-1.02). The chance of an uncomplicated birth was almost similar in the two groups (70.6% in the "birth environment room" versus 72.6% in the standard room, RR 0.97; 0.88-1.07) as were duration of labor (mean 7.9 hours in both groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Birthing in a specially designed physical birth environment did not lower use of oxytocin for augmentation of labor. Neither did it have any effect on duration of labor, use of pharmacological pain relief, and chance of birthing without complications. We recommend that future trials are conducted in birth units with greater improvement potentials.

摘要

目的

在过去十年中,人们对探索自然分娩环境对助产实践和女性分娩体验的影响越来越感兴趣。本研究基于这样一种假设,即分娩环境需要更多关注,以改善现代产科实践中现有的一些挑战,例如分娩期间催产素使用的增加和干预措施的数量。

研究设计

进行了一项随机对照试验,以研究在专门设计的“分娩环境室”分娩对分娩期间催产素使用的影响。该研究在丹麦海宁医院妇产科进行,纳入了680名单胎头位足月自然分娩的初产妇。将妇女随机分配到“分娩环境室”或标准分娩室。主要结局是使用催产素加强宫缩。次要结局包括产程、药物镇痛的使用和分娩方式。差异以相对风险(RR)估计,并给出95%置信区间。

结果

在主要结局即加强宫缩方面未发现差异(“分娩环境室”为29.1%,标准室为30.6%,RR 0.97;0.89 - 1.08)。“分娩环境室”中有更多女性使用浴缸(60.6%对52.4%,RR 1.18;1.02 - 1.37),而硬膜外镇痛使用倾向较低(22.6%对28.2%)未达到统计学意义(RR 0.87;0.74 - 1.02)。两组顺产的几率几乎相似(“分娩环境室”为70.6%,标准室为72.6%,RR 0.97;0.88 - 1.07),产程也相似(两组平均均为7.9小时)。

结论

在专门设计的自然分娩环境中分娩并未降低催产素用于加强宫缩的使用率。它对产程、药物镇痛的使用以及无并发症分娩的几率也没有任何影响。我们建议未来在具有更大改善潜力的分娩单元进行试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfa6/8010388/15c69d1ae408/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Does giving birth in a "birth environment room" versus a standard birth room lower augmentation of labor? - Results from a randomized controlled trial.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2021 Mar 13;10:100125. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2021.100125. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
Dosage of oxytocin for augmentation of labor and women's childbirth experiences: A randomized controlled trial.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 May;100(5):971-978. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14042. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
6
Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 17;10(10):CD002962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002962.pub4.
7
Impact of Birthing Room Design on Maternal Childbirth Experience: Results From the Room4Birth Randomized Trial.
HERD. 2023 Jan;16(1):200-218. doi: 10.1177/19375867221124232. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
9
Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 19;2016(5):CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3.
10
High dose versus low dose oxytocin for augmentation of delayed labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD007201. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007201.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing a new birthing room design: a qualitative study with a care provider perspective.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):1122. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10051-3.
2
Impact of Birthing Room Design on Maternal Childbirth Experience: Results From the Room4Birth Randomized Trial.
HERD. 2023 Jan;16(1):200-218. doi: 10.1177/19375867221124232. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

2
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766 Summary: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth.
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):406-408. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003081.
4
Regional variations in childbirth interventions in the Netherlands: a nationwide explorative study.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 1;18(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1795-0.
7
On the Planning and Design of Hospital Circulation Zones.
HERD. 2017 Jan;10(2):124-146. doi: 10.1177/1937586716672041. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
8
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 28;4(4):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5.
9
Snoezelen Room and Childbirth Outcome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015 May 31;17(5):e18373. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.17(5)2015.18373. eCollection 2015 May.
10
Space, place and the midwife: exploring the relationship between the birth environment, neurobiology and midwifery practice.
Women Birth. 2013 Dec;26(4):277-81. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Oct 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验