• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》中轴V的修订:症状是否应被纳入?

The revision of axis V in DSM-III-R: should symptoms have been included?

作者信息

Skodol A E, Link B G, Shrout P E, Horwath E

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, School of Public Health, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1988 Jul;145(7):825-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.7.825.

DOI:10.1176/ajp.145.7.825
PMID:3381926
Abstract

The authors studied the relationship of psychological symptoms to clinicians' ratings on DSM-III's axis V. A total of 355 patients received multiaxial assessments and were reinterviewed under blind conditions with the Psychiatric Epidemiology Research Interview, which contains scales to measure aspects of social and occupational functioning and various symptom dimensions. The majority of symptom scales were correlated significantly with axis V ratings. Axis I diagnosis explained 19.0% of the variance in axis V; demographics, 6.5%; and symptoms, 7%. Symptoms had a larger effect, in terms of explained variance, than adaptive functioning variables and tended to detract from the latter's significance. These results have implications for axis V in DSM-III-R and for planning DSM-IV.

摘要

作者研究了心理症状与临床医生对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)轴V的评分之间的关系。共有355名患者接受了多轴评估,并在盲态条件下接受了精神疾病流行病学研究访谈的再次访谈,该访谈包含测量社会和职业功能方面以及各种症状维度的量表。大多数症状量表与轴V评分显著相关。轴I诊断解释了轴V中19.0%的方差;人口统计学因素解释了6.5%;症状解释了7%。就解释的方差而言,症状比适应性功能变量的影响更大,并且往往会削弱后者的显著性。这些结果对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM - III - R)中的轴V以及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM - IV)的规划具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
The revision of axis V in DSM-III-R: should symptoms have been included?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》中轴V的修订:症状是否应被纳入?
Am J Psychiatry. 1988 Jul;145(7):825-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.7.825.
2
Toward construct validity for DSM-III Axis V.迈向《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版轴V的结构效度。
Psychiatry Res. 1988 Apr;24(1):13-23. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(88)90135-7.
3
The usefulness of DSM-III axis IV and axis V assessments.
Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Jul;143(7):904-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.7.904.
4
Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning.修订《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》的轴V:社会功能测量综述。
Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Sep;149(9):1148-56. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.9.1148.
5
The use of DSM-III in a general hospital consultation-liaison service.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1983 Jul;5(2):115-21. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(83)90110-x.
6
Reliability and validity of DSM-IV axis V.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴V的信度与效度
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;157(11):1858-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1858.
7
DSM-III field trials: II. Initial experience with the multiaxial system.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版现场试验:二、多轴系统的初步经验
Am J Psychiatry. 1979 Jun;136(6):818-20. doi: 10.1176/ajp.136.6.818.
8
Reliability and validity of DSM-IV Axis V scales in a clinical sample of veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴V量表在创伤后应激障碍退伍军人临床样本中的信度和效度
Psychiatr Danub. 2008 Sep;20(3):286-300.
9
Axis IV: a reliable and valid measure of psychosocial stressors?轴IV:心理社会应激源的可靠有效测量指标?
Compr Psychiatry. 1991 Nov-Dec;32(6):503-15. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(91)90029-c.
10
The assessment of symptom severity and functional impairment with DSM-IV axis V.DSM-IV 轴 V 中的症状严重程度和功能损害评估。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Apr;62(4):411-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.4.pss6204_0411.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and preliminary validation of the treatment adherence rating scale.治疗依从性评定量表的编制及初步验证。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;79:101832. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101832. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
2
The Global Functioning: Social and Role Scales-Further Validation in a Large Sample of Adolescents and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.《全球功能:社会和角色量表——在一大群有临床精神病高危的青少年和年轻人中的进一步验证》。
Schizophr Bull. 2019 Jun 18;45(4):763-772. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby126.
3
Memory support strategies and bundles: A pathway to improving cognitive therapy for depression?
记忆支持策略与方案:改善抑郁症认知疗法的途径?
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Mar;85(3):187-199. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000167.
4
Collecting Information for Rating Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF): Sources of Information and Methods for Information Collection.收集全球功能评估(GAF)评分信息:信息来源与收集方法
Curr Psychiatry Rev. 2014 Nov;10(4):330-347. doi: 10.2174/1573400509666140102000243.
5
Global assessment of psychosocial functioning in child and adolescent psychiatry. A review of three unidimensional scales (CGAS, GAF, GAPD).儿童和青少年精神病学中社会心理功能的整体评估。三种单维量表(儿童大体评定量表、大体功能评定量表、儿童适应不良评定量表)的综述
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;13(5):273-86. doi: 10.1007/s00787-004-0390-2.
6
The GAF and psychiatric outcome: a descriptive report.
Community Ment Health J. 1997 Feb;33(1):35-41. doi: 10.1023/a:1022413110345.
7
Measuring social disabilities in mental health.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1996 Jun;31(3-4):101-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00785755.