• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》的轴V:社会功能测量综述。

Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning.

作者信息

Goldman H H, Skodol A E, Lave T R

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Sep;149(9):1148-56. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.9.1148.

DOI:10.1176/ajp.149.9.1148
PMID:1386964
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Axis V, which uses the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale in the multiaxial system of DSM-III-R, is under review for DSM-IV. This article examines what is known about axis V and selectively reviews the literature on measures of social functioning to identify potential alternatives to the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale.

METHOD

About 25 studies on the use, reliability, and validity of axis V in DSM-III and DSM-III-R are reviewed. In addition, nearly 30 measures of social functioning are reviewed and analyzed as potential substitutes for the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. The analysis focuses on the strengths and weaknesses of each measure for assessing functioning on axis V.

RESULTS

Axis V measures are modestly reliable and valid but not widely used. The authors identify and discuss two particular limitations of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale: 1) the combination of measures of symptoms and measures of social functioning on a single axis and 2) the exclusion of physical impairments from the rating of functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the measures of social functioning reviewed is clearly superior to the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale for use on axis V. A modified version of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, separating the measures of social and occupational functioning from the measures of symptoms and psychological functioning, is proposed for field testing, along with a new set of instructions permitting the rating of limitations due to both physical and mental impairments.

摘要

目的

轴V在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)的多轴系统中使用功能总体评定量表,目前正接受《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的审查。本文探讨了关于轴V的已知情况,并选择性地回顾了社会功能测量方面的文献,以确定功能总体评定量表的潜在替代方法。

方法

回顾了约25项关于轴V在DSM-III和DSM-III-R中的使用、信度和效度的研究。此外,对近30种社会功能测量方法进行了回顾和分析,作为功能总体评定量表的潜在替代方法。分析重点在于每种测量方法在评估轴V功能方面的优缺点。

结果

轴V测量方法的信度和效度一般,但使用并不广泛。作者确定并讨论了功能总体评定量表的两个特殊局限性:1)在单一轴上症状测量与社会功能测量的结合;2)功能评定中排除身体损伤因素。

结论

所回顾的社会功能测量方法中,没有一种在用于轴V时明显优于功能总体评定量表。建议对功能总体评定量表进行修订,将社会和职业功能测量与症状和心理功能测量分开,进行现场测试,并给出一套新的指导说明,允许对身体和精神损伤造成的限制进行评定。

相似文献

1
Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning.修订《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》的轴V:社会功能测量综述。
Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Sep;149(9):1148-56. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.9.1148.
2
Reliability and validity of DSM-IV axis V.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴V的信度与效度
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;157(11):1858-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1858.
3
Field trial of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale--Modified.
Am J Psychiatry. 1995 Sep;152(9):1386-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.152.9.1386.
4
Reliability and validity of DSM-IV Axis V scales in a clinical sample of veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴V量表在创伤后应激障碍退伍军人临床样本中的信度和效度
Psychiatr Danub. 2008 Sep;20(3):286-300.
5
[Social adjustment of psychiatric patients: evaluation of a modified version of the GAF (Global Assessment of Functioning) Scale].[精神科患者的社会适应:功能大体评定量表(GAF)修订版的评估]
Psychiatr Prax. 1995 Sep;22(5):206-8.
6
The usefulness of DSM-III axis IV and axis V assessments.
Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Jul;143(7):904-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.7.904.
7
The revision of axis V in DSM-III-R: should symptoms have been included?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》中轴V的修订:症状是否应被纳入?
Am J Psychiatry. 1988 Jul;145(7):825-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.7.825.
8
The multiaxial system of ICD-10: evaluation of a preliminary draft in a multicentric field trial.《国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)的多轴系统:在多中心现场试验中对初稿的评估》
Psychopathology. 1996 Nov-Dec;29(6):347-56. doi: 10.1159/000285017.
9
[Multi-axial system of chapter V (F) of ICD-10. Initial results of a multicenter practicability and reliability study].[《国际疾病分类第十版》第五章(F)的多轴系统。一项多中心实用性和可靠性研究的初步结果]
Nervenarzt. 1997 Mar;68(3):231-8. doi: 10.1007/s001150050118.
10
Axis IV: a reliable and valid measure of psychosocial stressors?轴IV:心理社会应激源的可靠有效测量指标?
Compr Psychiatry. 1991 Nov-Dec;32(6):503-15. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(91)90029-c.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical deep phenotyping of treatment response in schizophrenia (CDP-STAR): design and methodology of a prospective multimodal observational study.精神分裂症治疗反应的临床深度表型分析(CDP-STAR):一项前瞻性多模态观察性研究的设计与方法
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02100-1.
2
A Case Series of Young People Receiving Adjunctive Immunotherapy for Neuroimmune-Mediated Major Mood or Psychotic Syndromes.一组接受辅助免疫疗法治疗神经免疫介导的重度情绪或精神病性综合征的年轻人病例系列
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2025 Jul 7;5(6):100564. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100564. eCollection 2025 Nov.
3
Baseline Clinical Characterization of Participants in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership Schizophrenia Program.
加速药物合作精神分裂症项目参与者的基线临床特征
Schizophr Bull Open. 2025 Aug 25;6(1):sgaf012. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf012. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Acceptance and commitment therapy applied to early psychosis: Therapeutic foundations and a narrative systematic review.接纳与承诺疗法应用于早期精神病:治疗基础及叙述性系统综述。
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):107313. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i8.107313.
5
Transdiagnostic Symptom Dimensions in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis: Towards Dimensional Representations of Pluripotent Risk.超高危精神病个体的跨诊断症状维度:迈向多能风险的维度表征
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Aug;19(8):e70086. doi: 10.1111/eip.70086.
6
Randomized controlled trial of add-on Fluoxetine versus usual antipsychotic treatment in obsessive compulsive symptoms in schizophrenia.在精神分裂症强迫症状中,氟西汀附加治疗与常规抗精神病药物治疗的随机对照试验
Indian J Psychiatry. 2025 Jul;67(7):666-674. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry_757_24. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
7
When a Mental Health Policy Change Meets a Youth Early-Intervention Service: Reflections on the Role of Diagnosis.当心理健康政策变革遇上青少年早期干预服务:对诊断作用的思考
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Aug;19(8):e70081. doi: 10.1111/eip.70081.
8
Estimating the longitudinal association between pain characteristics and clinical outcomes in young people with mental ill-health.评估心理健康状况不佳的年轻人疼痛特征与临床结局之间的纵向关联。
Psychol Med. 2025 Jul 30;55:e207. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725101104.
9
Evidence for Internal Misalignment of Circadian Rhythms in Youth With Emerging Mood Disorders.青少年出现情绪障碍时昼夜节律内部失调的证据。
J Biol Rhythms. 2025 Jul 15:7487304251349408. doi: 10.1177/07487304251349408.
10
Functional connectivity of subsystems of the default-mode network in patients with early psychotic symptoms.早期精神病性症状患者默认模式网络子系统的功能连接性。
Neuroimage Rep. 2025 Mar 11;5(1):100248. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100248. eCollection 2025 Mar.