• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

足内翻评分系统能否预测接受潘塞提方法治疗的患者的石膏固定次数和未来复发率?

Can clubfoot scoring systems predict the number of casts and future recurrences in patients undergoing Ponseti method?

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Apr 5;16(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02261-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-021-02261-4
PMID:33820564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8020540/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Congenital clubfoot is one of the common congenital orthopaedic deformities. Pirani and Dimeglio scoring systems are two classification systems for measuring the severity of the clubfoot. However, the relation between the initial amount of each of these scores and the treatment parameters is controversial.

METHODS

Patients with severe and very severe idiopathic clubfoot undergoing Ponseti treatment were entered. Their initial Pirani and Dimeglio scores, the number of castings as a short-term treatment parameter, and the recurrences as a long-term parameter until the age of three were prospectively documented.

RESULTS

One hundred patients (143 feet) with mean age of 9.51 ± 2.3 days including 68 males and 32 females and the mean initial Pirani score of 5.5 ± 0.5 and the mean initial Dimeglio score of 17.1 ± 1.6 were studied. The incidence of relapse was 8.4 %( n = 12). The mean initial Pirani score (P < 0.001) and the mean initial Dimeglio score (P < 0.003) of the feet with recurrence were significantly more than the non-recurrence feet. The mean number of casts in the recurrence group (7 ± 0.9) was significantly more than the feet without recurrences (6.01 ± 1.04) (P = 0.002). The ROC curve suggested the Pirani score of 5.75 and the Dimeglio score of 17.5 as the cut-off points of these scores for recurrence prediction.

CONCLUSION

In our study, Pirani and Dimeglio scores are markedly related with more number of casts and recurrence in patients with severe and very severe clubfoot. Also, we have introduced new cut-off points for both classification systems for prediction of recurrence. To the best of our knowledge, this finding has not been introduced into the English literature.

摘要

背景

先天性马蹄内翻足是常见的先天性骨科畸形之一。皮拉尼(Pirani)和迪梅格利奥(Dimeglio)评分系统是两种用于测量马蹄内翻足严重程度的分类系统。然而,这些评分的初始分值与治疗参数之间的关系存在争议。

方法

纳入接受潘塞蒂(Ponseti)治疗的严重和极严重特发性马蹄内翻足患者。前瞻性记录他们的初始皮拉尼(Pirani)和迪梅格利奥(Dimeglio)评分、短期治疗参数的石膏固定次数以及 3 岁前的复发情况作为长期参数。

结果

研究共纳入 100 例(143 足)患者,平均年龄为 9.51 ± 2.3 天,包括 68 例男性和 32 例女性,平均初始皮拉尼(Pirani)评分为 5.5 ± 0.5,平均初始迪梅格利奥(Dimeglio)评分为 17.1 ± 1.6。复发率为 8.4%(n=12)。复发组的平均初始皮拉尼(Pirani)评分(P < 0.001)和平均初始迪梅格利奥(Dimeglio)评分(P < 0.003)显著高于无复发组。复发组的石膏固定次数(7 ± 0.9)明显多于无复发组(6.01 ± 1.04)(P = 0.002)。ROC 曲线提示皮拉尼(Pirani)评分为 5.75 和迪梅格利奥(Dimeglio)评分为 17.5 可作为预测复发的评分截断值。

结论

在我们的研究中,皮拉尼(Pirani)和迪梅格利奥(Dimeglio)评分与严重和极严重马蹄内翻足患者的石膏固定次数和复发明显相关。此外,我们还为这两种分类系统引入了新的截断值来预测复发。据我们所知,这一发现尚未在英文文献中报道。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5f8/8020540/354f1ac50d6f/13018_2021_2261_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5f8/8020540/c045abedd361/13018_2021_2261_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5f8/8020540/9c12397d997b/13018_2021_2261_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5f8/8020540/354f1ac50d6f/13018_2021_2261_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5f8/8020540/c045abedd361/13018_2021_2261_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5f8/8020540/9c12397d997b/13018_2021_2261_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5f8/8020540/354f1ac50d6f/13018_2021_2261_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Can clubfoot scoring systems predict the number of casts and future recurrences in patients undergoing Ponseti method?足内翻评分系统能否预测接受潘塞提方法治疗的患者的石膏固定次数和未来复发率?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Apr 5;16(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02261-4.
2
Comparison of Dimeglio and Pirani score in predicting number of casts and need for tenotomy in clubfoot correction using the Ponseti method.使用庞塞蒂方法矫正马蹄足时,比较迪梅廖评分和皮拉尼评分在预测石膏固定次数及跟腱切断需求方面的作用。
Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2429-2436. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3873-3. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
3
Use of Ankle Dorsiflexion and the Dimeglio and Pirani Scores in Predicting Relapse of Clubfoot Treated With the Ponseti Method.踝关节背屈以及迪梅廖和皮拉尼评分在预测经庞塞蒂方法治疗的马蹄内翻足复发中的应用
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023 Mar-Apr;62(2):218-221. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.06.011. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
4
[Classification Systems to Evaluate the Clubfoot and Their Potential Use to Predict the Course and the Results of the Ponseti Method Treatment].[评估马蹄内翻足的分类系统及其预测Ponseti方法治疗过程和结果的潜在用途]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(5):331-335.
5
Correlation of Pirani and Dimeglio scores with number of Ponseti casts required for clubfoot correction.皮拉尼评分和迪梅廖评分与先天性马蹄内翻足矫正所需庞塞蒂石膏模型数量的相关性。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Sep;34(6):639-42. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000182.
6
Predictive ability of scoring systems towards casting in treatment of idiopathic clubfoot by the Ponseti method in infants.评分系统对 Ponseti 方法治疗婴儿特发性马蹄内翻足打石膏的预测能力。
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2021 Sep 1;30(5):478-483. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000832.
7
Management of Idiopathic Clubfoot by Ponseti Technique in Children Presenting After One Year of Age.庞塞蒂技术治疗一岁后就诊儿童特发性马蹄内翻足
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Sep-Oct;54(5):967-72. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
8
Does initial Pirani score and age influence number of Ponseti casts in children?初始的皮拉尼评分和年龄会影响儿童进行庞塞蒂石膏固定的次数吗?
Int Orthop. 2014 Mar;38(3):569-72. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2155-3. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
9
Correlation of age and severity scores to the number of Ponseti casts in Indian infants with clubfeet.印度先天性马蹄内翻足婴儿的年龄、严重程度评分与庞塞蒂石膏固定次数的相关性
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Oct;11(Suppl 5):S807-S811. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
10
Timing for Ponseti clubfoot management: does the age matter? 90 children (131 feet) with a mean follow-up of 5 years.潘塞提(Ponseti)马蹄足管理时机:年龄是否重要?90 例儿童(131 足),平均随访 5 年。
Acta Orthop. 2018 Dec;89(6):662-667. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1526534. Epub 2018 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Inter- and intra-rater reliability of video-documented Pirani Böhm Sinclair score: A potential method to screen for signs of recurrence in children with idiopathic clubfoot?视频记录的皮拉尼-伯姆-辛克莱评分的评分者间和评分者内信度:一种筛查特发性马蹄内翻足患儿复发迹象的潜在方法?
J Child Orthop. 2025 Jun 24:18632521251349437. doi: 10.1177/18632521251349437.
2
Association of Polymorphism in Locus of rs274503 (/) with the Risk of Idiopathic Clubfoot in Chinese Children: An 11-Center Case-Control Study.rs274503位点多态性与中国儿童特发性马蹄内翻足风险的关联:一项11中心病例对照研究。
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2024 Dec;28(12):461-466. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2023.0477. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of Number of Casts and Need of Tenotomy Using Pirani Score in the Management of Clubfoot.在马蹄内翻足治疗中使用皮拉尼评分预测石膏固定次数及肌腱切断需求
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jul;30(5):e477-e481. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005571.
2
Dimeglio Score Predicts Treatment Difficulty During Ponseti Casting for Isolated Clubfoot.迪梅廖评分可预测单纯马蹄内翻足Ponseti石膏固定治疗的难度。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 May/Jun;39(5):e402-e405. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001325.
3
Comparison of Dimeglio and Pirani score in predicting number of casts and need for tenotomy in clubfoot correction using the Ponseti method.
Initial clubfoot treatment in Sweden from 2016 to 2019: A national register study.
2016 年至 2019 年瑞典初次治疗先天性马蹄内翻足:全国注册研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 26;19(6):e0305900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305900. eCollection 2024.
4
Reproducibility of pop sensation, Thompson sign in achillotomy, and final Pirani score to predict clubfoot relapse: Achillotomy clinical signs and Pirani predictive ability.跟腱切断术时足 pops 征、Thompson 征的可重复性与最终 Pirani 评分预测先天性马蹄内翻足复发:跟腱切断术临床体征与 Pirani 预测能力。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 14;103(24):e38377. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038377.
5
A study on the effect of radiographic angles on clubfoot's recurrence.影像学角度对足踝畸形复发影响的研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 20;13(1):11734. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38882-4.
6
What exactly is "foot abduction" during management of idiopathic clubfoot in clinical practice?在临床实践中,治疗特发性马蹄内翻足时,“足部外展”究竟是什么?
Int Orthop. 2023 Apr;47(4):1109-1114. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05703-2. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
7
Factors associated with the relapse in Ponseti treated congenital clubfoot.与经潘塞蒂治疗的先天性马蹄内翻足复发相关的因素。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 26;23(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05039-9.
使用庞塞蒂方法矫正马蹄足时,比较迪梅廖评分和皮拉尼评分在预测石膏固定次数及跟腱切断需求方面的作用。
Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2429-2436. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3873-3. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
4
Factors affecting outcome after the use of the Ponseti method for the management of idiopathic clubfoot, a retrospective study in an orthopaedic referral institute.影响使用庞塞蒂方法治疗特发性马蹄内翻足预后的因素,一项在骨科转诊机构的回顾性研究
Acta Orthop Belg. 2016 Dec;82(4):705-709.
5
The Correlation of Pirani and Dimeglio Scoring Systems for Ponseti Management at Different Levels of Deformity Severity.皮拉尼和迪梅廖评分系统在不同畸形严重程度水平下对庞塞蒂治疗方法的相关性
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 6;7(1):14578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14977-7.
6
Factors associated with recurrence of clubfoot treated by the Ponseti method.与庞塞蒂方法治疗的马蹄内翻足复发相关的因素。
World J Clin Cases. 2016 Oct 16;4(10):318-322. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v4.i10.318.
7
Does Clubfoot Treatment Need to Begin As Soon As Possible?马蹄内翻足治疗需要尽快开始吗?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2016 Sep;36(6):558-64. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000514.
8
A Clinical Evaluation of the Pirani and Dimeglio Idiopathic Clubfoot Classifications.皮拉尼和迪梅廖特发性马蹄内翻足分类的临床评估
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jul-Aug;54(4):582-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
9
Worldwide spread of the Ponseti method for clubfoot.庞塞蒂法治疗马蹄内翻足的全球推广。
World J Orthop. 2014 Nov 18;5(5):585-90. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.585.
10
Interventions for congenital talipes equinovarus (clubfoot).先天性马蹄内翻足的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 12;2014(8):CD008602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008602.pub3.