• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国各地家庭食品和水应急准备措施

Household Food and Water Emergency Preparedness Practices Across the United States.

作者信息

Hiatt Erin, Belliard Carla, Lloyd Call Michelle A, Jefferies Laura K, Kener Madalyn, Eggett Dennis L, Richards Rickelle

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.

Department of Statistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.

出版信息

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jun;16(3):1029-1037. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.480. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1017/dmp.2020.480
PMID:33820591
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate food and water storage practices in the United States, including the extent that government emergency preparedness guidelines were followed.

METHODS

Qualtrics panelists (n = 572) completed a 142-item online survey in August 2014. Cognitive interviews (n = 5) and pilot data (n = 14) informed survey development. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantitative data. Open-ended responses related to water storage preparation were classified into 5 categories.

RESULTS

Many respondents reported being somewhat or well prepared to provide food and water for their households during a large-scale disaster or emergency. Only 53% met Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidelines to have water last at least 3 days. Based on respondents' self-report, it appeared that those who prepared personally-filled containers for water did not carefully follow FEMA instructions. Most respondents had non-perishable foods available, with 96% meeting the FEMA guidelines of at least 3 days of storage.

CONCLUSION

Households were generally prepared to provide food and, to a lesser extent, water in emergency situations, but were not consistently following FEMA guidelines. Additional easy-to-follow, evidence-based information may better help citizens accurately implement food and water storage emergency preparedness guidelines.

摘要

目的

评估美国的食物和水储存做法,包括遵循政府应急准备指南的程度。

方法

2014年8月,Qualtrics调查小组成员(n = 572)完成了一项包含142个项目的在线调查。认知访谈(n = 5)和试点数据(n = 14)为调查开发提供了信息。使用描述性统计分析定量数据。与储水准备相关的开放式回答被分为5类。

结果

许多受访者表示在大规模灾难或紧急情况期间,在一定程度上或很好地为家庭储备了食物和水。只有53%的人符合联邦紧急事务管理局(FEMA)的指导方针,即储备的水至少能维持3天。根据受访者的自我报告,那些准备个人装水容器的人似乎没有严格遵循FEMA的指示。大多数受访者备有不易腐烂的食物,96%的人符合FEMA至少储存3天的指导方针。

结论

家庭在紧急情况下通常准备好提供食物,在较小程度上也准备好提供水,但并未始终遵循FEMA的指导方针。更多易于遵循的、基于证据的信息可能会更好地帮助公民准确实施食物和水储存应急准备指南。

相似文献

1
Household Food and Water Emergency Preparedness Practices Across the United States.美国各地家庭食品和水应急准备措施
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jun;16(3):1029-1037. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.480. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
2
Disaster Preparedness among Active Duty Personnel, Retirees, Veterans, and Dependents.现役军人、退休人员、退伍军人及其家属的灾难准备情况。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Apr;31(2):132-40. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000157. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
3
Comparison of Emergency Preparedness Practices between Food Assistance Program Participants and Non-Participants in the United States.美国食品援助计划参与者和非参与者之间的应急准备实践比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 8;18(24):12937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412937.
4
Tailoring Household Disaster Preparedness Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities: Nursing Implications from Machine Learning Importance Features from the 2018-2020 FEMA National Household Survey.定制家庭灾害准备干预措施以减少健康差距:来自 FEMA 2018-2020 年全国家庭调查的机器学习重要特征的护理启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 23;21(5):521. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050521.
5
Historical Disaster Exposure and Household Preparedness Across the United States.历史灾害暴露与美国家庭准备度。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021 Feb;15(1):58-64. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2019.123. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
6
Emergency preparedness of veterans and nonveterans.退伍军人和非退伍军人的应急准备。
J Emerg Manag. 2016 Sep/Oct;14(5):327-333. doi: 10.5055/jem.2016.0297.
7
A National Survey of Hospital Cyber Attack Emergency Operation Preparedness.一项关于医院网络攻击应急行动准备情况的全国性调查。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2023 Mar 22;17:e363. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.283.
8
A pilot registry of trauma surgeons willing and ready to respond to disasters.创伤外科医生志愿和随时准备应对灾害的试点登记册。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Feb;84(2):393-396. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001751.
9
Emergency Food Supplies in Food Secure Households.粮食安全家庭中的应急食品供应
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Aug;30(4):359-64. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15004884. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
10
Characterizing household emergency preparedness levels for natural disasters during the COVID-19 pandemic: United States, 2020-2021.新冠疫情期间美国2020 - 2021年家庭自然灾害应急准备水平特征分析
J Emerg Manag. 2023;21(7):51-69. doi: 10.5055/jem.0737.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of the decision to build up excessive food stocks in the COVID-19 crisis.新冠疫情危机中过度建立粮食库存的决定因素。
Appetite. 2022 Sep 1;176:106089. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106089. Epub 2022 May 26.
2
Comparison of Emergency Preparedness Practices between Food Assistance Program Participants and Non-Participants in the United States.美国食品援助计划参与者和非参与者之间的应急准备实践比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 8;18(24):12937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412937.
3
Community Pantries: Responding to COVID-19 Food Insecurity.
社区食品库:应对新冠疫情期间的粮食不安全问题
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021 Jun 8:1. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.186.