• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国食品援助计划参与者和非参与者之间的应急准备实践比较。

Comparison of Emergency Preparedness Practices between Food Assistance Program Participants and Non-Participants in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.

Department of Statistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 8;18(24):12937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412937.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182412937
PMID:34948550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8702057/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research has suggested many households are meeting the Federal Emergency Management Agency's 3-day emergency food and water storage recommendations. The impact of limited economic household resources on emergency preparedness practices related to food and water is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to compare emergency preparedness practices in households participating in United States' food assistance programs with households not participating in these programs.

METHODS

A convenience sample of adults ( = 572) completed an online Qualtrics survey. Descriptive statistics, chi-square statistics, and independent -tests were used to measure differences between households participating in food assistance programs vs. non-participating households.

RESULTS

Most households participating in food assistance programs felt prepared to provide household members with food and water during an emergency, which did not significantly differ from non-participating households. Households using food assistance programs had less accessible cash but had similar foods on-hand for an emergency compared to non-participating households. However, they more frequently reported having baby formula/food and less frequently reported having vitamin/mineral supplements compared to non-participating households.

CONCLUSIONS

Food assistance programs may be effective in providing enough food and water to help low-income families be prepared for an emergency.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,许多家庭都满足联邦紧急事务管理署(Federal Emergency Management Agency)关于储备 3 天应急食物和水的建议。但经济资源有限的家庭在与食物和水相关的应急准备实践方面的情况尚不确定。本研究旨在比较参与美国食品援助计划的家庭与不参与这些计划的家庭的应急准备实践。

方法

采用便利抽样法选取 572 名成年人完成了在线的 Qualtrics 调查。使用描述性统计、卡方检验和独立检验来衡量参与食品援助计划的家庭与不参与家庭之间的差异。

结果

大多数参与食品援助计划的家庭表示,他们在紧急情况下有能力为家庭成员提供食物和水,这与不参与家庭没有显著差异。使用食品援助计划的家庭虽然现金的可获得性较低,但与不参与家庭相比,他们在紧急情况下手头有类似的食物。然而,他们更频繁地报告有婴儿配方食品/食物,而不太频繁地报告有维生素/矿物质补充剂。

结论

食品援助计划可能有助于为低收入家庭提供足够的食物和水,帮助他们为紧急情况做好准备。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Emergency Preparedness Practices between Food Assistance Program Participants and Non-Participants in the United States.美国食品援助计划参与者和非参与者之间的应急准备实践比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 8;18(24):12937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412937.
2
Heat or eat: the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and nutritional and health risks among children less than 3 years of age.取暖还是吃饭:低收入家庭能源援助计划与3岁以下儿童的营养和健康风险
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1293-302. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2943.
3
Household Food and Water Emergency Preparedness Practices Across the United States.美国各地家庭食品和水应急准备措施
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jun;16(3):1029-1037. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.480. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
4
SNAP Emergency Allotments, Emergency Rent Assistance, Rent Burden, and Housing and Food Security, June 2022-May 2023.2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 5 月期间的 SNAP 紧急拨款、紧急租金援助、租金负担和住房及粮食安全情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 Aug 29;21:E66. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.240121.
5
Very Low Food Security in US Households Is Predicted by Complex Patterns of Health, Economics, and Service Participation.美国美国家庭的极低粮食安全状况是由健康、经济和服务参与的复杂模式所预测的。
J Nutr. 2017 Oct;147(10):1992-2000. doi: 10.3945/jn.117.253179. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
6
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Three School Meals and Weekend Food Backpacks on Food Security in Virginia.弗吉尼亚州三项学校膳食和周末食品背包对粮食安全影响的随机对照试验
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Jan;121(1S):S34-S45. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.10.026.
7
Differences in Food-at-Home Spending for SNAP and Non-SNAP Households Given Geographic Price Variation.考虑到地理位置价格差异,SNAP 和非 SNAP 家庭在家庭食品支出上的差异。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Jul;120(7):1142-1150.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
8
Association of Grocery Expenditure Relative to Thrifty Food Plan Cost with Diet Quality of Women Participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.相对节俭食物计划成本的杂货支出与参加补充营养援助计划的妇女饮食质量的关联。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Dec;118(12):2315-2323. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
9
Delivering Summer Electronic Benefit Transfers for Children through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children: Benefit Use and Impacts on Food Security and Foods Consumed.通过补充营养援助计划或妇女、婴儿和儿童特别补充营养计划为儿童提供夏季电子福利转账:福利使用情况及其对粮食安全和所消费食品的影响。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Mar;117(3):367-375.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
10
Using direct observations on multiple occasions to measure household food availability among low-income Mexicano residents in Texas colonias.利用多次直接观察,测量德克萨斯州 colonias 中低收入墨西哥裔居民的家庭食物供应情况。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jul 29;10:445. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-445.

本文引用的文献

1
Household Food and Water Emergency Preparedness Practices Across the United States.美国各地家庭食品和水应急准备措施
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jun;16(3):1029-1037. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.480. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
2
Dietary Supplement Use Differs by Socioeconomic and Health-Related Characteristics among U.S. Adults, NHANES 2011⁻2014.膳食补充剂的使用因美国成年人的社会经济和健康相关特征而异,NHANES 2011-2014。
Nutrients. 2018 Aug 17;10(8):1114. doi: 10.3390/nu10081114.
3
Emergency Food Supplies in Food Secure Households.粮食安全家庭中的应急食品供应
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Aug;30(4):359-64. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15004884. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
4
Chronic conditions and household preparedness for public health emergencies: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2006-2010.慢性疾病与家庭应对突发公共卫生事件准备情况:行为危险因素监测系统,2006-2010 年。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014 Feb;29(1):13-20. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13009126. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
5
Shopping behaviors of low-income families during a 1-month period of time.低收入家庭在一个月内的购物行为。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Jan-Feb;45(1):20-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2012.05.016. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
6
Household emergency preparedness: a literature review.家庭应急准备:文献综述。
J Community Health. 2012 Jun;37(3):725-33. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9488-x.
7
Communicating actionable risk for terrorism and other hazards.传达针对恐怖主义和其他危害的可采取行动的风险。
Risk Anal. 2012 Apr;32(4):601-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01645.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
8
Communication inequalities during Public Health disasters: Katrina's wake.公共卫生灾难中的沟通不平等:卡特里娜飓风的余波。
Health Commun. 2010 Apr;25(3):221-9. doi: 10.1080/10410231003698895.
9
African Americans' decisions not to evacuate New Orleans before Hurricane Katrina: a qualitative study.非裔美国人在卡特里娜飓风来临前未撤离新奥尔良的决定:一项定性研究。
Am J Public Health. 2007 Apr;97 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S124-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.100867. Epub 2007 Apr 5.