• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Social policy in the face of a global pandemic: Policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis in Central and Eastern Europe.面对全球大流行的社会政策:中东欧地区对新冠疫情危机的政策应对措施
Soc Policy Adm. 2021 Mar;55(2):358-373. doi: 10.1111/spol.12704. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
2
HIV care in times of the COVID-19 crisis - Where are we now in Central and Eastern Europe?HIV 护理在 COVID-19 危机时期——在中东欧地区我们现在处于什么位置?
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;96:311-314. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.013. Epub 2020 May 11.
3
Differences of corruption types in selected Western and central-eastern health systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,选定的西中和东欧卫生系统中的腐败类型差异:快速审查。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 9;11:1269189. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1269189. eCollection 2023.
4
Antecedents of use of e-health services in Central Eastern Europe: a qualitative comparative analysis.中东欧电子健康服务使用的前因:定性比较分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5034-9.
5
Current state and prospects of biotechnology in Central and Eastern European countries. Part I: Visegrad countries (CZ, H, PL, SK).中东欧国家生物技术的现状和前景。第一部分:维谢格拉德集团国家(捷克、匈牙利、波兰、斯洛伐克)。
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2019 Feb;39(1):114-136. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2018.1523131. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
6
Research Ethics in the Context of Transition: Gaps in Policies and Programs on the Protection of Research Participants in the Selected Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.转型背景下的研究伦理:中东欧选定国家在研究参与者保护政策与项目方面的差距
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Dec;22(6):1689-1706. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9723-4. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
7
What is being done to respond to the rise of chronic diseases and multi-morbidity in Czechia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia?针对捷克、匈牙利、波兰和斯洛伐克慢性疾病和多种疾病发病率上升的问题,目前正在采取哪些应对措施?
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 16;10:1082164. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1082164. eCollection 2022.
8
Eastern Europe: pronatalist policies and private behavior.东欧:鼓励生育政策与个人行为
Popul Bull. 1982 Feb;36(6):1-49.
9
Health technology assessment and reimbursement policy for oncology orphan drugs in Central and Eastern Europe.中东欧的肿瘤孤儿药的卫生技术评估和报销政策。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020 Oct 8;15(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01556-9.
10
Biological therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases: access in Central and Eastern Europe.炎症性肠病的生物治疗:中东欧地区的可及性
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 14;21(6):1728-37. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1728.

引用本文的文献

1
The global response to the pandemic: An empirical cluster analysis of policies targeting COVID-19.全球对疫情的应对:针对新冠疫情政策的实证聚类分析
PLoS One. 2025 May 15;20(5):e0322692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322692. eCollection 2025.
2
Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the social sphere and lessons for crisis management: a literature review.新冠疫情对社会领域的影响及危机管理经验教训:文献综述
Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2023 Apr 10:1-26. doi: 10.1007/s11069-023-05959-2.
3
Widening double dualisation? Labour market inequalities and national social policy responses in Western Europe during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.日益扩大的双重二元化?新冠疫情第一波期间西欧的劳动力市场不平等与国家社会政策应对措施
Soc Policy Adm. 2022 May 13. doi: 10.1111/spol.12814.
4
An exploration of the political, social, economic and cultural factors affecting how different global regions initially reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic.对影响全球不同地区最初应对新冠疫情方式的政治、社会、经济和文化因素的探究。
Interface Focus. 2022 Feb 11;12(2):20210079. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2021.0079. eCollection 2022 Apr 6.
5
Informal caregiver support needs and burden: a survey in Lithuania.非正式照护者的支持需求和负担:立陶宛的一项调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 4;12(1):e054607. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054607.
6
Financial Inclusion Paradigm Shift in the Postpandemic Period. Digital-Divide and Gender Gap.后疫情时期金融包容性范式转变。数字鸿沟与性别差距。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 18;18(20):10938. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010938.
7
The social determinants of health and health outcomes among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.COVID-19 大流行期间成年人的健康和健康结果的社会决定因素:系统评价。
Public Health Nurs. 2021 Nov;38(6):942-952. doi: 10.1111/phn.12959. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
8
Social policy in the face of a global pandemic: Policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis.面对全球大流行的社会政策:对新冠疫情危机的政策应对措施。
Soc Policy Adm. 2021 Mar;55(2):249-260. doi: 10.1111/spol.12718. Epub 2021 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
BCG vaccine protection from severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).BCG 疫苗可预防严重的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 28;117(30):17720-17726. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008410117. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

面对全球大流行的社会政策:中东欧地区对新冠疫情危机的政策应对措施

Social policy in the face of a global pandemic: Policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis in Central and Eastern Europe.

作者信息

Aidukaite Jolanta, Saxonberg Steven, Szelewa Dorota, Szikra Dorottya

机构信息

Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences The Institute of Sociology Vilnius Lithuania.

Comenius University Bratislava Slovakia.

出版信息

Soc Policy Adm. 2021 Mar;55(2):358-373. doi: 10.1111/spol.12704. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1111/spol.12704
PMID:33821058
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8014863/
Abstract

This article documents and compares the social policies that the governments in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) implemented to combat the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic by focusing on Hungary, Lithuania, Poland and Slovakia. Our findings show that governments in all four countries reacted to the COVID-19 crisis by providing extensive protection for jobs and enterprises. Differences arise when it comes to solidaristic policy responses to care for the most vulnerable population, in which CEE countries show great variation. We find that social policy responses to the first wave of COVID-19 have largely depended on precious social policy trajectories as well as the political situation of the country during the pandemic.

摘要

本文通过聚焦匈牙利、立陶宛、波兰和斯洛伐克,记录并比较了中东欧(CEE)国家政府为抗击第一波新冠疫情而实施的社会政策。我们的研究结果表明,这四个国家的政府都通过为就业和企业提供广泛保护来应对新冠疫情危机。在针对最弱势群体的团结政策回应方面存在差异,中东欧国家在这方面表现出很大的不同。我们发现,对第一波新冠疫情的社会政策回应在很大程度上取决于先前的社会政策轨迹以及疫情期间该国的政治状况。