Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):742-748. doi: 10.1111/os.12979. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
For patients with non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), core decompression (CD) and bone grafts (BG) are mainly performed in the West, while osteotomy is found to be predominant in Japan. It is not well recognized how the surgical procedures for joint preservation in patients with ONFH are completely different between the United States and Japan. This paper identifies the contexts and the differences in treatment strategies for ONFH between the two countries. We compared the surgical trends of the two countries over three periods, 1997-2001, 2002-2006, and 2007-2011 (the US data for the third period was 2007-2008), based on a 2014 US paper and a 2013 national publication in Japan. We compared the details of surgery for non-traumatic ONFH under the same conditions in the two reports. For the period 1997-2001, the rates of surgeries for ONFH in the US were as follows: total hip arthroplasty (THA), 86%; CD, 10%; and osteotomy, 0.4%. In Japan, THA was 61%, osteotomy 38%, and CD 0%. For the recent period, 2007-2011 (US 2007-2008), the rate of THA was 91%, CD 6%, and osteotomy 0.1%, in the US, compared to a THA rate of 73%, CD 0%, and osteotomy 26% in Japan. The results for the interim period (2002-2006) were between the old and new data. The use of joint-preserving surgery for ONFH differs greatly between the US and Japan. The first-line joint-preserving surgery was CD in the US and osteotomy in Japan. Each procedure was rarely done in the other country. From about 2000 to 2010, the percentage of THA increased in both countries. The proportion of joint-preserving surgery (CD in the US and osteotomy in Japan) declined. The decrease in joint-preserving procedures may be largely attributed to improved long-term outcomes of THA due to technological advances. There is also a reluctance for young ONFH patients to undergo joint-preserving procedures, such as osteotomy, that require long-term hospitalization.
对于非创伤性股骨头坏死(ONFH)患者,西方主要采用核心减压(CD)和骨移植(BG),而日本则发现截骨术更为常见。对于美国和日本在 ONFH 患者关节保留手术方面的手术程序如何存在完全不同,目前还没有得到很好的认识。本文确定了这两个国家在治疗策略方面的背景和差异。我们根据 2014 年的一篇美国论文和 2013 年的一篇日本全国性出版物,比较了两国在三个时期(1997-2001 年、2002-2006 年和 2007-2011 年)的手术趋势。我们将两份报告中在相同条件下非创伤性 ONFH 的手术细节进行了比较。在 1997-2001 年期间,美国 ONFH 手术的比例如下:全髋关节置换术(THA)86%;CD 10%;截骨术 0.4%。在日本,THA 为 61%,截骨术 38%,CD 为 0%。在最近的时期,即 2007-2011 年(美国为 2007-2008 年),美国的 THA 率为 91%,CD 率为 6%,截骨术率为 0.1%,而日本的 THA 率为 73%,CD 率为 0%,截骨术率为 26%。中间时期(2002-2006 年)的结果介于新旧数据之间。美国和日本之间对 ONFH 关节保留手术的使用存在很大差异。一线关节保留手术是美国的 CD 和日本的截骨术。在另一个国家,这两种方法都很少使用。从 2000 年到 2010 年,两国的 THA 比例都有所增加。关节保留手术(美国的 CD 和日本的截骨术)的比例下降。关节保留手术的减少在很大程度上可能归因于由于技术进步,THA 的长期结果得到改善。对于年轻的 ONFH 患者来说,他们也不愿意接受需要长期住院的关节保留手术,如截骨术。