Suppr超能文献

髋部粗隆间骨折。钉板固定与恩德斯(Ender)髓内针固定的比较。

Intertrochanteric fracture of the hip. Comparison of nail-plate fixation and Ender's nailing.

作者信息

Juhn A, Krimerman J, Mendes D G

机构信息

Center for Implant Surgery, Haifa Medical Center (Rothschild), Israel.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1988;107(3):136-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00451592.

Abstract

Between April 1979 and August 1983, 201 patients with intertrochanteric fractures of the hip were admitted to Haife Medical Center (Rothschild), Israel. These patients were randomely divided into two groups: 104 patients underwent fixation with a compression screw and plate (Richard's Co.) and 97 patients underwent fixation with Ender's nails. The results of both groups were analyzed and evaluated clinically, economically, and socially. There were differences in operative time, incidence of infection, local complications, and functional capacity, but, on the other hand, no difference in the length of hospital stay. The perioperative mortality was significantly higher in the group that underwent fixation with Ender nails (seven to one), but the overall mortality was the same for both groups. The advantages of the Ender method are a quicker surgical procedure, diminished blood loss, and practically no risk of deep infection. The fixation with compression screw and plate assures a better anatomical reduction of the hip with fewer local complications and a better functional result, but carries a higher risk of infection.

摘要

1979年4月至1983年8月期间,201例髋部转子间骨折患者被收治入以色列海法医疗中心(罗斯柴尔德)。这些患者被随机分为两组:104例患者接受加压螺钉和钢板(理查兹公司)固定,97例患者接受恩德斯钉固定。对两组结果进行了临床、经济和社会方面的分析与评估。两组在手术时间、感染发生率、局部并发症和功能能力方面存在差异,但另一方面,住院时间无差异。接受恩德斯钉固定的组围手术期死亡率显著更高(7比1),但两组的总体死亡率相同。恩德斯方法的优点是手术过程更快、失血减少且几乎没有深部感染风险。加压螺钉和钢板固定可确保髋部更好的解剖复位,局部并发症更少且功能结果更好,但感染风险更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验