Juhn A, Krimerman J, Mendes D G
Center for Implant Surgery, Haifa Medical Center (Rothschild), Israel.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1988;107(3):136-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00451592.
Between April 1979 and August 1983, 201 patients with intertrochanteric fractures of the hip were admitted to Haife Medical Center (Rothschild), Israel. These patients were randomely divided into two groups: 104 patients underwent fixation with a compression screw and plate (Richard's Co.) and 97 patients underwent fixation with Ender's nails. The results of both groups were analyzed and evaluated clinically, economically, and socially. There were differences in operative time, incidence of infection, local complications, and functional capacity, but, on the other hand, no difference in the length of hospital stay. The perioperative mortality was significantly higher in the group that underwent fixation with Ender nails (seven to one), but the overall mortality was the same for both groups. The advantages of the Ender method are a quicker surgical procedure, diminished blood loss, and practically no risk of deep infection. The fixation with compression screw and plate assures a better anatomical reduction of the hip with fewer local complications and a better functional result, but carries a higher risk of infection.
1979年4月至1983年8月期间,201例髋部转子间骨折患者被收治入以色列海法医疗中心(罗斯柴尔德)。这些患者被随机分为两组:104例患者接受加压螺钉和钢板(理查兹公司)固定,97例患者接受恩德斯钉固定。对两组结果进行了临床、经济和社会方面的分析与评估。两组在手术时间、感染发生率、局部并发症和功能能力方面存在差异,但另一方面,住院时间无差异。接受恩德斯钉固定的组围手术期死亡率显著更高(7比1),但两组的总体死亡率相同。恩德斯方法的优点是手术过程更快、失血减少且几乎没有深部感染风险。加压螺钉和钢板固定可确保髋部更好的解剖复位,局部并发症更少且功能结果更好,但感染风险更高。