Suppr超能文献

线索暴露会引发甲基苯丙胺使用障碍个体的抑制缺陷。

Cue Exposure Triggers Inhibitory Deficits in Individuals With Methamphetamine Use Disorder.

机构信息

Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China.

Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Province, Dalian 116029, China.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2021 Mar;82(2):197-203.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Inhibitory deficits contribute to impulsive drug-seeking behavior in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD). Whether abstinent individuals with MUD exhibit greater cognitive disinhibition when the suppressed response is associated with drug-related images is not fully known. This study evaluated the potency of drug-associated cue exposure in this process.

METHOD

We recruited 54 abstinent men with MUD and 46 healthy control (HC) subjects to complete a novel go/no-go task in which drug-associated cues were presented in 240 trials.

RESULTS

Upon exposure to drug-associated cues, the numbers of commission errors increased significantly only in the abstinent MUD group (p < .001), and the abstinent MUD group produced higher levels of commission errors than the HC group (p = .009). When drug-associated cues were not available (in scrambled trials), the abstinent MUD group produced similar levels of commission errors when compared with the HC group (p = .336). The reaction times in drug cue exposure trials were longer than in scrambled trials across groups (p < .001), whereas the abstinent MUD group produced shorter reaction times than HCs, regardless of trial conditions (p = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel go/no-go task is a useful method for detecting impulsivity in abstinent individuals with MUD. Cue exposure triggers impairment of inhibitory control in individuals with MUD at abstinence.

摘要

目的

在有甲基苯丙胺使用障碍(MUD)的个体中,抑制缺陷导致冲动性觅药行为。在与药物相关的图像相关联的被抑制反应时,是否有 MUD 戒断个体表现出更大的认知抑制缺失尚不完全清楚。本研究评估了这一过程中药物相关线索暴露的效力。

方法

我们招募了 54 名有 MUD 戒断的男性和 46 名健康对照(HC)受试者,以完成一项新的 Go/No-Go 任务,其中在 240 次试验中呈现药物相关线索。

结果

在暴露于药物相关线索时,只有 MUD 戒断组的错误数显著增加(p<0.001),并且 MUD 戒断组产生的错误数高于 HC 组(p=0.009)。当没有药物相关线索(在乱序试验中)时,与 HC 组相比,MUD 戒断组产生的错误数相似(p=0.336)。在药物线索暴露试验中,反应时间长于乱序试验,无论试验条件如何,MUD 戒断组的反应时间都比 HC 组短(p<0.001)。

结论

新的 Go/No-Go 任务是一种检测 MUD 戒断个体冲动性的有用方法。线索暴露会导致 MUD 戒断个体在戒断时抑制控制受损。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验