• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项防止酒类商店发生任何未成年人购买行为的地方法规评估:执法的必要性。

Evaluation of a Local Ordinance to Prevent Any Underage Purchases in Liquor Stores: The Need for Enforcement.

作者信息

Milam Adam J, Furr-Holden C Debra M, Nesoff Elizabeth D, Trangenstein Pamela J

机构信息

Division of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, Michigan.

Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2021 Mar;82(2):219-227. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2021.82.219.

DOI:10.15288/jsad.2021.82.219
PMID:33823969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8864619/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In June 2012, Baltimore City, MD, enacted legislation (commonly referred to as the Mosby Bill) prohibiting all liquor stores (outlets that primarily sell alcoholic beverages) from selling "any food, goods, wares, supplies, or other merchandise to any person under the age of 18." Three years after enactment, we evaluated the impact of this legislation on non-alcohol product sales among youth.

METHOD

Research assistants (RAs) ages 16-20 were trained in using a standardized observational tool to quantify and record characteristics of the outlets, including products sold. A trained pair comprising one RA age 16 to 20 and one RA exactly age 18 were sent into every liquor store (i.e., packaged goods stores and bar/taverns with packaged goods sales) in Baltimore to conduct the assessment and make a non-alcohol purchase. Since the research was not conducted in concert with the police, the 18-year-old RA made the purchase attempt while the other (age 16 to 20) RA completed the assessment.

RESULTS

Purchase attempts were made at 502 liquor stores, and 352 of those attempts were successful (able to make purchase without being asked for identification or age; noncompliance rate = 68.1%). Noncompliance was highest among packaged goods stores compared with bar/taverns, and in neighborhoods with a lower median household income and a higher proportion of African American residents (p < .050). Noncompliant outlets were also located closer to public schools (p < .050).

CONCLUSIONS

This evaluation demonstrates that, in the absence of enforcement, ordinances are neither likely to be honored nor to achieve the intended public health benefits.

摘要

目的

2012年6月,马里兰州巴尔的摩市颁布了一项立法(通常称为《莫斯比法案》),禁止所有酒类商店(主要销售酒精饮料的店铺)向“任何18岁以下的人出售‘任何食品、商品、货物、用品或其他商品’”。该立法颁布三年后,我们评估了这项立法对青少年非酒精产品销售的影响。

方法

对年龄在16 - 20岁的研究助理(RAs)进行培训,使其使用标准化观察工具来量化和记录店铺的特征,包括所售产品。每两名经过培训的人员组成一组,其中一名年龄在16至20岁,另一名恰好为18岁,他们被派往巴尔的摩的每家酒类商店(即包装商品店以及有包装商品销售的酒吧/酒馆)进行评估并进行一次非酒精产品购买。由于该研究并非与警方协同进行,因此由18岁的研究助理进行购买尝试,而另一名(16至20岁)研究助理完成评估。

结果

在502家酒类商店进行了购买尝试,其中352次尝试成功(能够在未被要求出示身份证件或询问年龄的情况下完成购买;违规率 = 68.1%)。与酒吧/酒馆相比,包装商品店的违规率最高,在家庭收入中位数较低且非裔美国居民比例较高的社区也是如此(p < 0.050)。违规店铺距离公立学校也更近(p < 0.050)。

结论

该评估表明,在缺乏执法的情况下,条例既不太可能得到遵守,也不太可能实现预期的公共卫生效益。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Local Ordinance to Prevent Any Underage Purchases in Liquor Stores: The Need for Enforcement.一项防止酒类商店发生任何未成年人购买行为的地方法规评估:执法的必要性。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2021 Mar;82(2):219-227. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2021.82.219.
2
Using Zoning as a Public Health Tool to Reduce Alcohol Outlet Oversaturation, Promote Compliance, and Guide Future Enforcement: a Preliminary Analysis of Transform Baltimore.利用分区规划作为公共卫生工具来减少酒类销售点过度饱和,促进合规,并指导未来的执法:巴尔的摩转型的初步分析。
J Urban Health. 2020 Aug;97(4):568-582. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00453-7.
3
Using Zoning as a Public Health Tool to Reduce Oversaturation of Alcohol Outlets: an Examination of the Effects of the New "300 Foot Rule" on Packaged Goods Stores in a Mid-Atlantic City.利用分区规划作为公共卫生工具,减少酒类销售点过度饱和:新“300 英尺规则”对大西洋中部城市包装商品店的影响研究。
Prev Sci. 2019 Aug;20(6):833-843. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0947-9.
4
Underage purchasing of alcohol from packaged liquor outlets: an Australian study.从包装酒类商店购买酒精饮料的未成年人行为:一项澳大利亚的研究。
Health Promot Int. 2017 Oct 1;32(5):790-799. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw007.
5
Remote age verification to prevent underage alcohol sales. First results from Dutch liquor stores and the economic viability of national adoption.远程年龄验证以防止向未成年人销售酒精饮料。荷兰酒类商店的初步结果及全国采用的经济可行性。
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Apr;26(4):364-70. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
6
Mystery shopping and alcohol sales: do supermarkets and liquor stores sell alcohol to underage customers?神秘顾客调查与酒类销售:超市和酒类商店是否会向未成年顾客出售酒类?
J Adolesc Health. 2007 Sep;41(3):302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
7
Alcohol outlet characteristics and alcohol sales to youth: results of alcohol purchase surveys in 45 Oregon communities.酒类销售点特征与向青少年销售酒类情况:俄勒冈州45个社区酒类购买调查结果
Prev Sci. 2007 Jun;8(2):153-9. doi: 10.1007/s11121-006-0063-0. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
8
Alcohol sales to underage adolescents: an unobtrusive observational field study and evaluation of a police intervention.向未成年青少年销售酒精饮料:一项非介入性观察性实地研究及对警方干预措施的评估。
Addiction. 2000 Sep;95(9):1373-88. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95913738.x.
9
Characteristics, policies and practices of alcohol outlets and sales to underage persons.酒类销售点的特点、政策与做法以及向未成年人售酒的情况。
J Stud Alcohol. 1996 Nov;57(6):670-4. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1996.57.670.
10
A monitoring and site visit intervention to reduce sales to minors at packaged liquor outlets.一种监测和现场访问干预措施,以减少包装酒品销售点向未成年人销售酒品的行为。
Health Promot J Austr. 2024 Apr;35(2):285-292. doi: 10.1002/hpja.744. Epub 2023 May 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Zoning as a Public Health Tool to Reduce Alcohol Outlet Oversaturation, Promote Compliance, and Guide Future Enforcement: a Preliminary Analysis of Transform Baltimore.利用分区规划作为公共卫生工具来减少酒类销售点过度饱和,促进合规,并指导未来的执法:巴尔的摩转型的初步分析。
J Urban Health. 2020 Aug;97(4):568-582. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00453-7.
2
Alcohol Outlet Clusters and Population Disparities.酒精销售点聚集与人口差异。
J Urban Health. 2020 Feb;97(1):123-136. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00372-2.
3
Understanding the relationship between alcohol outlet density and life expectancy in Baltimore City: The role of community violence and community disadvantage.了解巴尔的摩市酒类销售点密度与预期寿命之间的关系:社区暴力和社区劣势的作用。
J Community Psychol. 2019 Jan;47(1):63-75. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22099. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
4
Outlet Type, Access to Alcohol, and Violent Crime.出口类型、酒精获取途径与暴力犯罪。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Nov;42(11):2234-2245. doi: 10.1111/acer.13880. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
5
Alcohol Outlets, Neighborhood Retail Environments, and Pedestrian Injury Risk.酒精销售点、社区零售环境与行人受伤风险
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Oct;42(10):1979-1987. doi: 10.1111/acer.13844. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
6
Increased minimum legal age for the sale of alcohol in the Netherlands as of 2014: The effect on alcohol sellers' compliance after one and two years.2014 年起,荷兰将酒类销售最低法定年龄提高:实施一年和两年后对酒类销售商合规性的影响。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Nov;49:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
7
Alcohol marketing and youth alcohol consumption: a systematic review of longitudinal studies published since 2008.酒精营销与青少年酒精消费:对2008年以来发表的纵向研究的系统综述
Addiction. 2017 Jan;112 Suppl 1:7-20. doi: 10.1111/add.13591. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
8
Tobacco policies and on-premise smoking in bars and clubs that cater to young African Americans following the Maryland Clean Indoor Air Act of 2007.2007年《马里兰州清洁室内空气法案》实施后,针对迎合年轻非裔美国人的酒吧和俱乐部的烟草政策及室内吸烟情况。
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2017 Jul-Sep;16(3):328-343. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2016.1196631. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
9
The Effect of a Sunday Liquor-Sales Ban Repeal on Crime: A Triple-Difference Analysis.周日酒类销售禁令废除对犯罪的影响:三重差分分析
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 May;40(5):1111-21. doi: 10.1111/acer.13047. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
10
Not in My Back Yard: A Comparative Analysis of Crime Around Publicly Funded Drug Treatment Centers, Liquor Stores, Convenience Stores, and Corner Stores in One Mid-Atlantic City.不要建在我家后院:对大西洋中部一座城市由公共资金资助的戒毒治疗中心、酒类商店、便利店和街角商店周边犯罪情况的比较分析。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 Jan;77(1):17-24. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.17.