Medical Doctor, St George's University School of Medicine, Great River, NY.
Resident Physician, Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Jul-Aug;60(4):802-806. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
There is currently no consensus on the importance of bone graft use in ankle arthrodesis. Despite this, bone graft is widely used. We aimed to summarize the available literature on primary open ankle arthrodesis fixated with cannulated screws in order to assess the importance of bone graft in achieving more favorable rates of fusion. PubMed and Embase were queried for articles reporting on primary open ankle arthrodesis fixated with cannulated screws which specified use or non-use of bone graft. Pooled data analysis was performed. Modified Coleman Methodology Scores were calculated to assess reporting quality. Twenty-seven studies met our inclusion criteria and were divided into three groups: no bone graft (NBG), fibular onlay with bone graft (FOBG), and use of bone graft (BG). All three groups had comparable fusion rates of 94.7%, 95.3%, and 95.1% respectively (p = .98). Number needed to treat was 7 and Absolute Risk Reduction was 14.8%. The reviewed literature was largely of moderate quality, with an overall Coleman score of 60.6 and no significance between the 3 groups (p = .93). In conclusion, primary open ankle arthrodesis fixated with cannulated screws generally had favorable fusion rates, and bone graft use did not have a significant effect on union rates. The available literature suggests that bone graft may not be needed in routine tibiotalar arthrodesis in low-risk patients. It may more significantly impact patients who are at high-risk of fusion failure, and dedicated research on this high-risk subset of patients is required.
目前,对于在踝关节融合术中使用骨移植物的重要性尚未达成共识。尽管如此,骨移植物仍被广泛应用。我们旨在总结现有的关于使用空心螺钉固定的初次开放式踝关节融合术的文献,以评估骨移植物在实现更有利的融合率方面的重要性。我们在 PubMed 和 Embase 上检索了报告使用或不使用骨移植物的空心螺钉固定初次开放式踝关节融合术的文章。对汇总数据进行了分析。使用改良 Coleman 方法学评分来评估报告质量。有 27 项研究符合我们的纳入标准,并分为三组:无骨移植物(NBG)、腓骨骨瓣加骨移植物(FOBG)和使用骨移植物(BG)。三组的融合率分别为 94.7%、95.3%和 95.1%(p=0.98)。需要治疗的病例数为 7 例,绝对风险降低为 14.8%。所审查的文献大多为中等质量,总体 Coleman 评分为 60.6,三组之间无显著性差异(p=0.93)。总之,使用空心螺钉固定的初次开放式踝关节融合术通常具有良好的融合率,并且骨移植物的使用对融合率没有显著影响。现有文献表明,在低风险患者中,常规距骨融合术可能不需要骨移植物。它可能对融合失败风险较高的患者产生更显著的影响,需要对这组高风险患者进行专门的研究。