Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
Copenhagen Research Group for Inflammatory Skin, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Jun 1;157(6):676-683. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.0221.
The efficacy of adalimumab biosimilars is similar to that of brand-name adalimumab (Humira, hereinafter originator) in clinical trials. However, limited knowledge about real-world data exists for adalimumab biosimilars.
To assess the outcomes following a mandatory nonmedical switch from adalimumab originator to adalimumab biosimilars in patients with psoriasis.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study assesses the outcomes following a switch from adalimumab originator to an adalimumab biosimilar. Patients in the Biological Treatment in Danish Dermatology (DERMBIO) registry, a Danish nationwide registry of all patients treated with biologics (including biosimilars) for psoriasis since 2007, were assessed for eligibility. All patients who switched from adalimumab originator to an adalimumab biosimilar between November 1, 2018, and May 1, 2019, were included in the adalimumab biosimilar cohort. All patients with a visit between May 1, 2017, and November 1, 2017, treated with adalimumab originator were included in the adalimumab originator cohort. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2020, to October 10, 2021.
Switch from adalimumab originator to an adalimumab biosimilar.
The primary outcome was 1-year drug retention in patients switching to adalimumab biosimilars compared with patients treated with adalimumab originator. Crude and adjusted retention rates for the adalimumab biosimilar cohort were compared with the adalimumab originator cohort with Cox proportional hazards regression using robust variance.
A total of 348 patients were included in the adalimumab biosimilar cohort (mean [SD] age, 52.2 [13.6] years; 251 [72.1%] male) and 378 patients in the adalimumab originator cohort (mean [SD] age, 51.1 [14.1] years; 272 [72.0%] male). The 1-year drug retention rates were 92.0% (95% CI, 89.0%-94.9%) for the adalimumab biosimilar cohort and 92.1% (95% CI, 89.4%-94.8%) for the adalimumab originator cohort. Similar hazard ratios were observed between the 2 cohorts. The crude hazard ratios were 1.02 (95% CI, 0.61-1.70; P = .94) for all causes of drug discontinuation, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.39-1.73; P = .60) for insufficient effect, and 1.41 (95% CI, 0.52-3.77; P = .50) for adverse events for the adalimumab biosimilar cohort when compared with the adalimumab originator cohort.
In this cohort study from Denmark, a nonmedical switch from adalimumab originator to adalimumab biosimilars was not associated with drug retention.
阿达木单抗生物类似药在临床试验中的疗效与品牌阿达木单抗(Humira,以下简称原研药)相似。然而,关于阿达木单抗生物类似药的真实世界数据的了解有限。
评估强制性非医学转换后银屑病患者使用阿达木单抗原研药和阿达木单抗生物类似药的结局。
设计、地点和参与者:本队列研究评估了从阿达木单抗原研药转换为阿达木单抗生物类似药后的结局。丹麦全国性生物制剂(包括生物类似药)治疗银屑病患者的生物治疗登记处(DERMBIO)的患者符合入选条件。2018 年 11 月 1 日至 2019 年 5 月 1 日期间,所有从阿达木单抗原研药转换为阿达木单抗生物类似药的患者均被纳入阿达木单抗生物类似药队列。所有在 2017 年 5 月 1 日至 2017 年 11 月 1 日期间接受阿达木单抗原研药治疗的患者均被纳入阿达木单抗原研药队列。数据于 2020 年 6 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 10 日进行分析。
从阿达木单抗原研药转换为阿达木单抗生物类似药。
主要结局是与接受阿达木单抗原研药治疗的患者相比,转换为阿达木单抗生物类似药的患者在 1 年内的药物保留率。使用稳健方差的 Cox 比例风险回归比较阿达木单抗生物类似药队列和阿达木单抗原研药队列的粗保留率和调整保留率。
共纳入阿达木单抗生物类似药队列 348 例(平均[SD]年龄,52.2[13.6]岁;251[72.1%]为男性)和阿达木单抗原研药队列 378 例(平均[SD]年龄,51.1[14.1]岁;272[72.0%]为男性)。阿达木单抗生物类似药队列的 1 年药物保留率为 92.0%(95%CI,89.0%-94.9%),阿达木单抗原研药队列为 92.1%(95%CI,89.4%-94.8%)。两个队列之间观察到相似的风险比。阿达木单抗生物类似药队列的粗风险比分别为所有原因停药的 1.02(95%CI,0.61-1.70;P=0.94)、疗效不足的 0.82(95%CI,0.39-1.73;P=0.60)和不良事件的 1.41(95%CI,0.52-3.77;P=0.50),与阿达木单抗原研药队列相比。
在这项来自丹麦的队列研究中,从阿达木单抗原研药到阿达木单抗生物类似药的非医学转换与药物保留无关。