Suppr超能文献

2014 年创伤性脑疾病综合征标准用于 CTE 病理学的有效性。

Validity of the 2014 traumatic encephalopathy syndrome criteria for CTE pathology.

机构信息

Boston University Alzheimer's Disease and CTE Centers, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Oct;17(10):1709-1724. doi: 10.1002/alz.12338. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Validity of the 2014 traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES) criteria, proposed to diagnose chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) in life, has not been assessed.

METHODS

A total of 336 consecutive brain donors exposed to repetitive head impacts from contact sports, military service, and/or physical violence were included. Blinded to clinical information, neuropathologists applied National Institute on Neurological Disorders and Stroke/National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering CTE criteria. Blinded to neuropathological information, clinicians interviewed informants and reviewed medical records. An expert panel adjudicated TES diagnoses.

RESULTS

A total of 309 donors were diagnosed with TES; 244 donors had CTE pathology. TES criteria demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 0.97 and 0.21, respectively. Cognitive (odds ratio [OR] = 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-5.1), but not mood/behavior or motor symptoms, were significantly associated with CTE pathology. Having Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology was significantly associated with reduced TES accuracy (OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.12-0.59).

DISCUSSION

TES criteria provided good evidence to rule out, but limited evidence to rule in, CTE pathology. Requiring cognitive symptoms in revised criteria and using AD biomarkers may improve CTE pathology prediction.

摘要

简介

为了在生前诊断慢性创伤性脑病(CTE),提出了 2014 年创伤性脑病综合征(TES)标准,但尚未对其有效性进行评估。

方法

共纳入 336 例连续的脑供体,这些供体均曾遭受过反复的头部撞击,这些撞击来自接触性运动、兵役和/或身体暴力。在不了解临床信息的情况下,神经病理学家应用国家神经疾病和中风研究所/国家生物医学成像和生物工程 CTE 标准进行诊断。在不了解神经病理学信息的情况下,临床医生对知情者进行了访谈并查阅了病历。一个专家小组对 TES 诊断进行了裁决。

结果

共有 309 名供体被诊断为 TES;244 名供体有 CTE 病理学。TES 标准的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.97 和 0.21。认知(比值比 [OR] = 3.6;95%置信区间 [CI]:1.2-5.1),而不是情绪/行为或运动症状,与 CTE 病理学显著相关。患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)病理学与 TES 准确性降低显著相关(OR = 0.27;95%CI:0.12-0.59)。

讨论

TES 标准为排除 CTE 病理学提供了充分的证据,但为确定 CTE 病理学提供的证据有限。在修订标准中要求认知症状,并使用 AD 生物标志物,可能会提高 CTE 病理学的预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b3/8596795/24e729b9391b/ALZ-17-1709-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验