Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 12;14(7):785-792. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.025.
This study analyzed the learning curve effect when a new stroke thrombectomy program was initiated in a cardiac cath lab in close cooperation with neurologists and radiologists.
Mechanical thrombectomy has proven to be the best treatment option for ischemic stroke patients, but this method is not widely available.
An endovascular treatment program for acute ischemic strokes was established in the cardiac cath lab of a tertiary university hospital in 2012. The decision to perform catheter-based thrombectomy was made by a neurologist and was based on acute stroke clinical symptoms and computed tomography angiographic findings. Patients with a large vessel occlusion of either anterior or posterior circulation were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the functional neurological outcome (Modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score) of the patient at 3 months. A total of 333 patients were enrolled between October 2012 and December 2019.
The clinical (mRS) outcomes did not vary significantly across years 2012 to 2019 (mRS 0 to 2 was achieved in 47.9% of patients). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 19 patients (5.7%). Embolization in a new vascular territory occurred in 6 patients (1.8%).
When a catheter-based thrombectomy program was initiated in an experienced cardiac cath lab in close cooperation between cardiologists, neurologists, and radiologists, outcomes were comparable to those of neuroradiology centers. The desired clinical results were achieved from the onset of the program, without any signs of a learning curve effect. These findings support the potential role of interventional cardiac cath labs in the treatment of acute stroke in regions where this therapy is not readily available due to the lack of neurointerventionalists.
本研究分析了在心脏病学介入治疗中心与神经科医生和放射科医生密切合作开展新的卒中取栓项目时的学习曲线效应。
机械取栓已被证明是缺血性卒中患者的最佳治疗选择,但这种方法并不广泛可用。
2012 年,在一家三级大学医院的心脏病学介入治疗中心建立了急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗项目。神经科医生决定是否进行基于导管的取栓,决策依据是急性卒中的临床症状和 CT 血管造影结果。前循环或后循环大血管闭塞的患者被纳入研究。主要终点是患者在 3 个月时的神经功能结局(改良 Rankin 量表[mRS]评分)。2012 年 10 月至 2019 年 12 月,共纳入 333 例患者。
2012 年至 2019 年,患者的临床结局(mRS)无显著差异(mRS 0-2 的患者占 47.9%)。19 例患者发生症状性颅内出血(5.7%)。6 例患者发生新的血管区域栓塞(1.8%)。
在经验丰富的心脏病学介入治疗中心、心内科医生、神经科医生和放射科医生密切合作下开展基于导管的取栓项目时,其结果与神经放射学中心相当。该项目启动后即达到预期的临床效果,无学习曲线效应的迹象。这些发现支持介入心脏病学介入治疗中心在神经介入治疗资源缺乏的地区治疗急性卒中的潜在作用。