• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单纯化疗与根治性同期放化疗治疗 cT4b 食管鳞癌的比较:一项基于人群的研究。

Chemotherapy alone versus definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cT4b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based study.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan.

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr 7;21(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01742-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12876-021-01742-4
PMID:33827451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8028221/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of radiotherapy for cT4bNanyM0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESqCC) is relatively unclear, with both chemotherapy (C/T) alone and definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT) being treatment options in the current guidelines. We aimed to compare the survival of dCCRT versus C/T for these patients via a population-based approach.

METHODS

Eligible cT4b ESqCC patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2017 were identified via the Taiwan Cancer Registry. We used propensity score (PS) weighting to balance the observable potential confounders between groups. The hazard ratio (HR) of death and incidence of esophageal cancer mortality (IECM) were compared between dCCRT and C/T. We also evaluated OS in subgroups of either low or standard radiotherapy doses.

RESULTS

Our primary analysis consisted of 247 patients in whom covariates were well balanced after PS weighing. The HR for death when dCCRT was compared with C/T was 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.24-0.53, P < 0.001). Similar results were found for IECM. Statistical significance was only observed in the standard RT dose but not in the low dose in subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based nonrandomized study of cT4bNanyM0 ESqCC patients from Asia (Taiwan), we found that the use of radiotherapy with chemotherapy was associated with better overall survival than chemotherapy alone. Further studies (especially RCTs) are needed to confirm our findings.

摘要

背景

对于 cT4bNanyM0 食管鳞状细胞癌(ESqCC)患者,放疗的作用尚不清楚,目前的指南中同时推荐单独化疗(C/T)和根治性同步放化疗(dCCRT)。我们旨在通过基于人群的方法比较 dCCRT 与 C/T 对这些患者的生存影响。

方法

通过台湾癌症登记处,确定了 2011 年至 2017 年间诊断的 cT4b ESqCC 患者。我们使用倾向评分(PS)加权来平衡组间可观察到的潜在混杂因素。比较 dCCRT 与 C/T 组的死亡风险比(HR)和食管癌死亡率(IECM)。我们还评估了低剂量或标准剂量放疗亚组的 OS。

结果

我们的主要分析包括 247 例患者,这些患者在 PS 加权后协变量得到了很好的平衡。与 C/T 相比,dCCRT 的死亡 HR 为 0.36(95%置信区间 0.24-0.53,P<0.001)。对于 IECM 也得到了类似的结果。仅在标准 RT 剂量亚组中观察到统计学意义,而在低剂量亚组中则没有。

结论

在这项来自亚洲(台湾)的 cT4bNanyM0 ESqCC 患者的基于人群的非随机研究中,我们发现与单独化疗相比,化疗联合放疗可改善总生存。需要进一步的研究(特别是 RCT)来证实我们的发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/150e/8028221/195a30a804b6/12876_2021_1742_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/150e/8028221/245ee5efab13/12876_2021_1742_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/150e/8028221/195a30a804b6/12876_2021_1742_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/150e/8028221/245ee5efab13/12876_2021_1742_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/150e/8028221/195a30a804b6/12876_2021_1742_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Chemotherapy alone versus definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cT4b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based study.单纯化疗与根治性同期放化疗治疗 cT4b 食管鳞癌的比较:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr 7;21(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01742-4.
2
Optimal radiotherapy dose in cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population based study.根治性同步放化疗治疗颈段食管鳞癌患者的最佳放疗剂量:一项基于人群的研究。
Thorac Cancer. 2021 Jul;12(14):2065-2071. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14009. Epub 2021 May 24.
3
Consolidative chemotherapy after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a population based cohort study.根治性放化疗后巩固化疗治疗食管鳞癌患者:基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 10;22(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02464-x.
4
Effectiveness of image-guided radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.图像引导放疗对局部晚期食管鳞癌根治性同步放化疗患者的疗效。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Jan;11(1):113-119. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13244. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
5
Effectiveness evaluation of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with positron emission tomography-staged esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after complete resection: A population-based cohort study.基于人群队列研究的正电子发射断层扫描分期食管鳞癌完全切除术后辅助同步放化疗的疗效评价。
Thorac Cancer. 2022 Jul;13(13):1986-1993. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14476. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
6
Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for patients with non-metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population-based propensity-score-matched analysis.非转移性食管鳞状细胞癌患者接受根治性同步放化疗时调强放疗与三维适形放疗的比较:一项基于人群的倾向评分匹配分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(22):e10928. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010928.
7
Impact of the interval between neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy in the modern era: a population-based propensity-score-matched retrospective cohort study in Asia.新辅助同期放化疗与食管癌切除术间隔时间的影响:亚洲一项基于人群的倾向评分匹配回顾性队列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec 19;17(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1712-7.
8
Effectiveness of image-guided radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.图像引导放疗对局部晚期肺癌患者同步放化疗的疗效。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Sep;11(9):2639-2649. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13596. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
Outcomes of Localized Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Using Either Standard or High Radiotherapy Dose: A Retrospective Study Controlling for Organ at Risk Dose.采用标准或高放疗剂量的根治性同步放化疗治疗局限性食管鳞状细胞癌患者的疗效:一项针对危及器官剂量的回顾性研究
Anticancer Res. 2019 Jan;39(1):511-517. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13142.
10
Neoadjuvant vs definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.新辅助与根治性同期放化疗治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌的比较。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul 14;16(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1444-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of chemotherapy with/without radiotherapy for stage IVb esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based target trial emulation study.化疗联合或不联合放疗治疗IVb期食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效:一项基于人群的目标试验模拟研究
Discov Oncol. 2025 May 6;16(1):672. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02451-0.
2
Consolidative chemotherapy after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a population based cohort study.根治性放化疗后巩固化疗治疗食管鳞癌患者:基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 10;22(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02464-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Using propensity scores to estimate effects of treatment initiation decisions: State of the science.利用倾向评分估计治疗启动决策的效果:科学现状。
Stat Med. 2021 Mar 30;40(7):1718-1735. doi: 10.1002/sim.8866. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
2
Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer.帕博利珠单抗对比化疗用于晚期食管癌的随机 III 期 KEYNOTE-181 研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 10;38(35):4138-4148. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01888. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3
Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounders for credible and reliable real-world evidence.
评估未测量混杂因素对可信可靠真实世界证据的影响。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Oct;29(10):1219-1227. doi: 10.1002/pds.5117. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
4
Understanding Propensity Score Analyses.理解倾向得分分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Jul 1;107(3):404-407. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.638.
5
Effectiveness of image-guided radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.图像引导放疗对局部晚期食管鳞癌根治性同步放化疗患者的疗效。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Jan;11(1):113-119. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13244. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
6
Phase III study of tri-modality combination therapy with induction docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced unresectable squamous-cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG1510: TRIANgLE).三模式联合治疗诱导多西紫杉醇加顺铂和氟尿嘧啶与局部晚期不可切除的胸段食管鳞状细胞癌的标准放化疗的 III 期研究(JCOG1510:TRIANgLE)
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 18;49(11):1055-1060. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz112.
7
Treatment and clinical outcome of clinical T4 esophageal cancer: A systematic review.临床T4期食管癌的治疗与临床结局:一项系统评价
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2018 Dec 13;3(2):169-180. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12222. eCollection 2019 Mar.
8
Taiwan's Nationwide Cancer Registry System of 40 years: Past, present, and future.台湾四十年全国癌症登记系统:过去、现在与未来。 需要说明的是,台湾是中国的省级行政区,不是一个国家,不存在“Nation”(国家)的说法,这种表述是对一个中国原则的严重违反。维护国家领土完整,人人有责。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 May;118(5):856-858. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
9
Real-world data: towards achieving the achievable in cancer care.真实世界数据:在癌症治疗中实现可实现的目标。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 May;16(5):312-325. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0167-7.
10
Using the E-Value to Assess the Potential Effect of Unmeasured Confounding in Observational Studies.使用E值评估观察性研究中未测量混杂因素的潜在影响。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):602-603. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.21554.