A Novel Stimulus to Improve Perimetric Sampling within the Macula in Patients with Glaucoma.

SIGNIFICANCE

Identifying glaucomatous damage to the macula has become important for diagnosing and managing patients with glaucoma. In this study, we presented an approach that provides better perimetric sampling for the macular region, by testing four locations, with a good structure-function agreement.

PURPOSE

We previously presented a basis for customizing perimetric locations within the macula. In this study, we aimed to improve perimetric sampling within the macula by presenting a stimulus at four locations, with maintaining a good structure-function agreement.

METHODS

We tested one eye each of 30 patients (aged 50 to 88 years). Patients were selected based on observed structural damage to the macula, whereas perimetric defect (using 24-2) did not reflect the locations and extent of this damage. We used en face images to visualize retinal nerve fiber bundle defects. To measure perimetric sensitivities, we used a blob stimulus (standard deviation of 0.25°) at the 10-2 locations. A perimetric defect for a location was defined as any value equal to or deeper than -4, -5, and -6 dB below the mean sensitivity for 37 age-similar controls (aged 47 to 78 years). We also presented an elongated sinusoidal stimulus for 20 patients at four locations within the macula, in which we defined a perimetric defect as any value below the 2.5th percentile from controls.

RESULTS

The -4, -5, and -6 dB criteria identified perimetric defects in 14, 13, and 11 patients, respectively. When testing with the elongated stimulus, 18 patients were identified with perimetric defect. The perimetric defects were consistent with the structural damage.

CONCLUSIONS

The elongated stimulus showed a good structure-function agreement with only four testing locations as compared with 68 locations used with the blob stimulus. This demonstrates a clinical potential for this new stimulus in the next generation of perimetry.