Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Spinal Cord. 2021 May;59(5):571-581. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00627-3. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
Peer reviewing is a key mechanism underlying science publishing, but during their graduate training clinicians and researchers are unlikely to be taught the skill. This paper sets forth the art of peer reviewing in general, and the types of reviews that are most useful to the Editors of Spinal Cord (SC). The topics addressed are: the SC editorial process; the role of the referee; review process steps; the content and language of a review; and resources available to peer reviewers.
同行评审是科学出版的关键机制，但在研究生培训期间，临床医生和研究人员不太可能学习这一技能。本文阐述了同行评审的一般艺术，以及对《脊髓》（SC）编辑最有用的评审类型。涉及的主题有：SC 编辑过程；评审员的角色；评审过程步骤；评审的内容和语言；以及同行评审员可用的资源。
